The Sovereignty of the Digital Space of Socio-Political Communications in Contemporary Russia and Its Key Components: Evidence from Expert Research
- Авторлар: Volodenkov S.V.1,2, Fedorchenko S.N.1,2
-
Мекемелер:
- State Academic University for the Humanities
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Шығарылым: Том 27, № 3 (2025): Digital policies
- Беттер: 520-542
- Бөлім: DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1438/article/view/348834
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2025-27-3-520-542
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NJLOLX
- ID: 348834
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
In the context of global technological transformations in the digital communication sphere, ensuring the digital sovereignty of a contemporary state is becoming increasingly urgent. This problem is of particular importance in the sphere of socio-political communications, which is characterized by its significant potential to influence mass consciousness and transform the traditional spiritual and moral foundations of state and society. The identified problem acquires additional significance for Russia, which is currently in a geopolitical confrontation with the collective West, many of whose countries are technologically advanced powers claiming a dominant role in the digital space. The authors studied current digitalization practices in various countries of the world and also conducted an international expert study, based on the analysis of the results of which several key conclusions were made regarding the content, structure, and degree of universality of models for ensuring the sovereignty of the digital space of socio-political communications. Based on the results of the study, the authors conclude that sovereignization processes in modern states have national specificity, which raises the question of the need to develop a model of digital sovereignization based on national characteristics in contemporary Russia. In addition, the results of the study allow us to conclude that the digital sovereignty of the space of socio-political communications is a single system of interconnected infrastructural, communication, technological, personnel, competence, management and content (value-semantic) components that ensure in their unity, achieved with the help of national legislation and practices of its implementation, independent and successful functioning in the national interests of the socio-political sphere of life of a modern state in the digital space. The key components of the digital sovereignty system of the national space of socio-political communications identified in this study can be used as a basis for developing our own model of digital sovereignty for contemporary Russia.
Авторлар туралы
Sergey Volodenkov
State Academic University for the Humanities; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: s.v.cyber@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2928-6068
Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher of the Research and Design Department of the Scientific and Innovation Department of the State Academic University for the Humanities; Professor of the Department of Public Policy, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Moscow, Russian FederationSergey Fedorchenko
State Academic University for the Humanities; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: s.n.fedorchenko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6563-044X
Doctor of Political Sciences, Chief Researcher of the Research and Design Department of the Scientific and Innovation Department of the State Academic University for the Humanities; Associate Professor, Department of History and Theory of Politics, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Moscow, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Becerra, M., & Waisbord, S.R. (2021). The curious absence of cybernationalism in Latin America: Lessons for the study of digital sovereignty and governance. Communication and the Public, 6, (1–4), 67–79. http://doi.org/10.1177/20570473211046730 EDN: JRSZPA
- Buchinskaya, O.N. (2024). Digital colonization — a new phenomenon of the world economy. Economic science of modern Russia, (3), 78–92. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2024-3(106)-78-92. EDN: UMWAOR
- Danilenkov, A.V. (2017). State sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the information and telecommunications network “Internet”. Lex Russica, (7), 154–165. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2017.128.7.154-165 EDN: ZGLADJ
- Fedorchenko, S.N. (2023). State-civilization in the digital ecumene. Journal of Political Research, 7(1), 3–26. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-1-3-26 EDN: YDIBNI
- Flonk, D., Jachtenfuchs, M., & Obendiek, A. (2024). Controlling internet content in the EU: towards digital sovereignty. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), 2316–2342. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2309179.
- Gupta, S., & Sony, R. (2021). Quest of data colonialism and cyber sovereignty: India’s strategic position in cyberspace. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 2(2), 70–81. http://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2021.2.68.81 EDN: ZUYQDF
- Hashemzadegan, A., & Gholami, A. (2022). Internet censorship in Iran: An inside look. Journal of Cyberspace Studies, 6(2), 183–204. http://doi.org/10.22059/jcss.2022.349715.1080.
- Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens versus the Internet: Confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 103–156. http://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707 EDN: NFILHV
- Kulikovsky, A.V. (2021). Possible launch of an autonomous Runet and its role in ensuring information security of the EAEU. Bulletin of the Tajik State University of Law, Business and Politics. Humanities Series, (2), 83–90. (In Russian). EDN: RBEAUT
- Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Clas, 60(4), 3–26. http://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172.
- Lehuedé, S. (2024). An alternative planetary future? Digital sovereignty frameworks and the decolonial option. Big Data & Society, 11(1), http://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231221778. Retrieved October 15, 2024, from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20539517231221778 EDN: BJUFCO
- Mann, M., & Daly, A. (2019). (Big) Data and the North-in-South: Australia’s informational imperialism and digital colonialism. Television and New Media, 20(4), 379–395. http://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418806091.
- Melnikova, O. (2022). China’s experience in protecting national cyber sovereignty. International Affairs, 12, 106–119. (In Russian). EDN: ASJJJF
- Panday, J., & Samdub, M.T. (2024). Promises and pitfalls of India’s AI industrial policy. In A. Kak & S.Myers West (Eds.), AI Nationalism(s): Global Industrial Policy Approaches to AI (pp. 85–104). AI Now Institute.
- Smorgunov, L.V. (2019). Institutionalization of controllability and the problem of control in the space of digital communications. South Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20(3), 62–75. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-62-75. EDN: LLGQAM
- Urtaeva, E.B. (2024). The influence of social networks on the development of political communications in the new digital reality. Society: politics, economics, law, (3), 40–49. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2024.3.3. EDN: AYQJMS
- Vakhovsky, A.M. (2019). Sovereignization of the Internet as a problem of the modern political process. News of Tula State University. Humanities, (1), 11–18. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6141-2019-10101 EDN: QUHETJ
- Volodenkov, S.V. (2024). Digital actants and computational propaganda as tools for influencing mass consciousness in the context of global technological transformations. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 12. Political sciences, (2), 47–70. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0868-4871-12-2024-2-2-47-70. EDN: FPYCYW
- Zhukov, A.Z., & Shugunov, T.L. (2020). Implementation of the law on the “sovereign RuNet”: Legal and technical aspects. Socio-political sciences, 10(2), 139–142. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2020-10-2-139-142. EDN: WGPBUI
Қосымша файлдар

