Let’s Play Politics: Multiplayer Computer Games as a Communicative Political Technology
- Авторлар: Shlykova D.N.1, Turkin I.A.1
-
Мекемелер:
- RUDN University
- Шығарылым: Том 27, № 2 (2025): Political Game Studies
- Беттер: 243-260
- Бөлім: POLITICAL GAME STUDIES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1438/article/view/322495
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2025-27-2-243-260
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KUVQAY
- ID: 322495
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Computer games have evolved beyond mere entertainment or escapism, becoming increasingly politicized within contemporary society. This transformation reflects several key trends: the growing number and diversification of gamers worldwide, the creation of alternative platforms for cross-border social interactions, and the emergence of novel behavior patterns influenced by in-game experiences. Modern forms of civic engagement exhibit two distinct characteristics: heightened reliance on interactive “new media” channels for communicating demands to political systems via a dual-layered communication framework, alongside a proliferation of performative elements-so-called “theatrical practices”-in political discourse. As integrated components of the metaverse, video games now facilitate the intertwining of real-world and digital environments, rendering them influential tools for policymaking. However, this convergence may exacerbate societal tensions due to reduced geographical separation and diminished opportunities for face-to-face dialogue among diverse social strata. Additionally, the inherent nature of gaming-its playful and simulated aspects-alters ethical norms governing communication, freeing participants from constraints imposed by reality while enabling unusual conduct unseen in conventional settings. Consequently, it becomes imperative to explore whether increased regulation of player activities within these virtual domains might emerge over time. Ultimately, though structured similarly to conventional modes of political involvement, the primary objective remains securing control and maintaining authority in both online and offline contexts.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Daria Shlykova
RUDN University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: shlykova-dn@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8502-8261
Postgraduate of the Department of Comparative Politics
Moscow, Russian FederationIlya Turkin
RUDN University
Email: ilya.turkin2001@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-9485-1659
master student, Department of Comparative Politics
Moscow, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Angel, O.Yu. (2023). The metaverse as a new media phenomenon of society: Prospects for creation and social consequences. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes, (3), 221–226. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-3-221-226
- Balakina, Yu.V., Morozova, N.N., & Radina, N.K. (2024). Media, culture, and popular geopolitics: How imagined spaces and identities are formed. Polis. Political Studies, (6), 40–53. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.06.04
- Barthes, R. (2003). System of fashion. Articles on cultural semiotics. Moscow: Sabashnikovy Publ. House. (In Russian). [Barthes, R. (1967). Système de la mode. Paris: Éditions du Seuil].
- Belov, S.I. (2024). Image of the USSR in the game ‛Atomic Heart᾿. Political Science (RU), (4), 168–189. (In Russian). http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.04.07
- Bowditch, L., Naweed, A., Signal, T., & Chapman, J. (2024). More Than Just a Game: Understanding How Internet Games Are Used in Times of Stress. Entertainment Computing, (49), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100617
- Crouch, C. (2010). Post-Democracy. Moscow: HSE Publ.House. (In Russian). [Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Polity Press]
- Deleuze, G. (2004). Cinema. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (In Russian). [Deleuze, G. (1983). Cinéma 1: L’image-mouvement..Deleuze, G. (1985). Cinéma 2: L᾿image-temps.].
- Fedorchenko, S.N. (2018). Computer Game Studies: New horizons for political science and practice. Herald of Omsk University. Series «Historical studies», (4), 172–182. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25513/2312-1375.2018.4.172-182
- Foucault, M. (2011). Security, territory, population. Lectures delivered at College de France 1977–1978. St Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian).
- Horkheimer, M. (2024). Culture industry: Enlightenment as deception of masses. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
- Kapustin, B. (2019). Reflections on the end of revolution. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. House. (In Russian).
- Kazarinova, D.B. (2025). Alternative for Tuvalu’s statehood: Sunk to the bottom or move to the metaverse? RUDN Journal of Political Science, 27(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2025-27-1-102-115
- Kosorukov, A.A. (2017). New media as a tool of public policy and socio-political transformation of public space (on the example of Arab Spring)]. Sociodinamika, (7), 64–84. (In Russian).
- Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. (2004). Relevant past: Symbolic politics of ruling elite and identity dilemmas in Russia. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russian).
- Potsieluev, S.P. (1999). Symbolic politics as staging and aestheticization. Polis. Political studies, (5), 62–76. (In Russian).
- Radayev, V. (2019). Millennials: How Russian society is changing. Moscow: HSE Publ. House. (In Russian).
- Rainbrook, D.V. (2018). Against elections. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
- Ryabov, D.O., & Kolpakova, M.M. (2024). ‛Domesticating᾿ geopolitics in modern Russian children᾿s war board games. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 25(4), 80–91. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-25-4-80-91
- Ryabov, O.V. (Ed.) (2023). “Enemy Number One” in symbolic policies of Soviet and American cinemas during Cold War era. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russian).
- Semenov, V.V., & Tsvetov, P.Yu. (2022). Protests in Hong Kong: Reasons and possible consequences. Observer, (2), 72–87. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2022_02_72
- Varlamova, Yu.A. (2022). Intergenerational digital divide in Russia. Mir Rossii, 31(2), 51–74. (In Russian).https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-2-51-74
- Varufakis, Ya. (2025). Technofeudalism: What killed capitalism. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
- Vetushinskii, A. (2015). To play game studies press the start button. Logos, (1), 41–60. (In Russian).
- Zuboff, Sh. (2022). Age of surveillance capitalism: Fight for human future at new frontiers of power. Moscow: Gaidar Institut Publishing House. (In Russian). [Zuboff, Sh. (2019). Age of surveillance capitalism: Fight for human future at new frontiers of power. New York: Public Affairs].
Қосымша файлдар
