Psychophysiological mechanisms of internal pronunciation of words in people with stuttering
- Authors: Vartanov A.V.1, Kiselnikov A.A.1, Abrosimova V.D.1, Zubko V.M.1, Leonovich D.A.2, Shevaldova O.V.3, Krysko M.D.4
-
Affiliations:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Federal Research Center for Innovative and Advanced Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies
- Russian State University for the Humanities
- Issue: Vol 22, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 289-315
- Section: CURRENT TRENDS IN PERSONALITY RESEARCH
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1683/article/view/365329
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2025-22-2-289-315
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UVSDER
- ID: 365329
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The identification of psychophysiological mechanisms underlying internal pronunciation in healthy individuals may enhance the performance of modern brain–computer interfaces that rely on the recognition of mental commands. Studying the brain mechanisms of internal pronunciation in people with stuttering can contribute to understanding the causes of this speech disorder and to developing new or improving existing methods of stuttering correction. The purpose of the study was to compare the psychophysiological mechanisms of internal speech (internal pronunciation) and word perception in people with normal and speech defects (stuttering). Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings were obtained from 35 participants (25 with normal speech and 10 with stuttering) using a 19-channel system while they performed a task involving listening to and internally pronouncing four words in Russian (“sakhar”, “shashlyk”, “raketa”, and “r’aketa”). The analysis was carried out using a novel tool – the virtual implanted electrode technique (Patent RU 2,785,268 C1 by A.V. Vartanov), which enables the reconstruction of neural activity across several brain regions, including six areas of interest: Broca’s area, Wernicke’s area and their right-hemisphere homologues, as well as the cerebellum bilaterally. The activity data obtained were compared in control (normal) groups and people with stuttering. The comparison revealed significant differences in reconstructed electrical activity with an emphasis on hyperactivation in stutterers of the Broca’s area, the symmetrical zone on the right, and the cerebellar cortex bilaterally, compared with the control group, when listening and pronouncing words internally. In this way the process of perception and internal pronunciation of words in a group of normals and stutterers is different. The significant differences observed in Broca’s area likely reflect its primary role in speech production, whereas differences in the cerebellar cortex may be related to its supportive function in the motor coordination of speech. The absence of differences in the Wernicke’s zone can be considered as a consequence of the lack of auditory feedback during internal pronunciation.
About the authors
Alexander V. Vartanov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: a_v_vartanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8844-9643
SPIN-code: 9511-2918
PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Department of Psychophysiology
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian FederationAndrey A. Kiselnikov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: kiselnikov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9848-5322
SPIN-code: 1895-9026
PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Department of Psychophysiology
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian FederationVasilisa D. Abrosimova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: vasilisaabr@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-9296-714X
Laboratory Assistant, Department of Psychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian FederationVeronika M. Zubko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: q158veronika@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-2513-8359
PhD Student, Department of Psychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian FederationDaria A. Leonovich
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Email: dagubareva@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-3028-2278
PhD Student
84/1 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119606, Russian FederationOlga V. Shevaldova
Federal Research Center for Innovative and Advanced Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies
Email: shevaldova_ov@academpharm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8577-4280
SPIN-code: 9395-5102
Junior Researcher
8 Baltiyskaya Street, Moscow, 125315, Russian FederationMariya D. Krysko
Russian State University for the Humanities
Email: mariya.krysko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9263-5203
Assistant Lecturer, Department of General Psychology, L.S. Vygotsky Institute of Psychology
6/6 Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047, Russian FederationReferences
- Alderson-Day, B., Weis, S., McCarthy-Jones, S., Moseley, P., Smailes, D., & Fernyhough, C. (2016). The brain’s conversation with itself: Neural substrates of dialogic inner speech. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(1), 110–120. https:// doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv094
- Biermann-Ruben, K., Salmelin, R., & Schnitzler, A. (2005). Right rolandic activation during speech perception in stutterers: A MEG study. NeuroImage, 25(3), 793–801. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.024
- Chang, S.-E., Kenney, M.K., Loucks, T.M.J., & Ludlow, C.L. (2009). Brain activation abnormalities during speech and non-speech in stuttering speakers. NeuroImage, 46(1), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.066
- D’Ausilio, A., Pulvermüller, F., Salmas, P., Bufalari, I., Begliomini, C., & Fadiga, L. (2009). The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology, 19(5), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.017
- De Nil, L.F., Kroll, R.M., Kapur, S., & Houle, S. (2000). A positron emission tomography study of silent and oral single word reading in stuttering and nonstuttering adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(4), 1038–1053. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4304.1038
- Forster, D.C., & Webster, W.G. (2001). Speech-motor control and interhemispheric relations in recovered and persistent stuttering. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn1902_1
- Foundas, A.L., Corey, D.M., Angeles, V., Bollich, A.M., Crabtree–Hartman, E., & Heilman, K.M. (2003). Atypical cerebral laterality in adults with persistent developmental stuttering. Neurology, 61(10), 1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000094320.44334.86
- Fowler, C.A. (2016). Speech perception as a perceptuo-motor skill. In Neurobiology of Language (pp. 175–184). London: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00015-8
- Fridriksson, J., Moss, J., Davis, B., Baylis, G.C., Bonilha, L., & Rorden, C. (2008). Motor speech perception modulates the cortical language areas. NeuroImage, 41(2), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.046
- Gavrilenko, Yu.Yu., Saada, D.F., Shevchenko, A.O., & Ilyushin, E.A. (2019). A review on internal pro-nouncing recognition methods based on electroencephalogram data. Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education, 15(1), 164–171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.15.201901.164-171
- Glukhov, V.P. (2005). Fundamentals of psycholinguistics. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russ.)
- Guenther, F.H., & Vladusich, T. (2012). A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25(5), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.08.006
- Halag-Milo, T., Stoppelman, N., Kronfeld-Duenias, V., Civier, O., Amir, O., Ezrati-Vinacour, R., & Ben-Shachar, M. (2016). Beyond production: Brain responses during speech perception in adults who stutter. NeuroImage: Clinical, 11, 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.02.017
- Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3158
- Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113
- Hickok, G., Houde, J., & Rong, F. (2011). Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: Computational basis and neural organization. Neuron, 69(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.019
- Ivanov, А.А. (2023). Overview of mathematical EEG analysis. Quantitative EEG. Epilepsy and Paroxysmal Conditions, 15(2), 171-192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2077-8333/epi.par.con.2023.154
- Jäncke, L., Hänggi, J., & Steinmetz, H. (2004). Morphological brain differences between adult stutterers and non-stutterers. BMC Neurology, 4(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-4-23
- Karpova, N.L., Nikolaeva, E.I., Dobrin, A.V., & Poprik, Y.B. (2023). Neuropsychological and psychophysiological studies in logopsychotherapy: In memory of J.M. Glozman. Lurian Journal, 4(2), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.15826/lurian.2023.4.2.4
- Langland-Hassan, P., & Vicente, A. (Eds.). (2018). Inner speech: New voices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796640.001.0001
- Lee, B.S. (1951). Artificial stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 16(1), 53–55. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.1601.53
- Lu, C., Long, Y., Zheng, L., Shi, G., Liu, L., Ding, G., & Howell, P. (2016). Relationship between speech production and perception in people who stutter. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00224
- Martin, S., Iturrate, I., Millán, J.D.R., Knight, R.T., & Pasley, B.N. (2018). Decoding inner speech using electrocorticography: Progress and challenges toward a speech prosthesis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00422
- McGuire, P.K., Silbersweig, D.A., Murray, R.M., David, A.S., Frackowiak, R.S.J., & Frith, C.D. (1996). Functional anatomy of inner speech and auditory verbal imagery. Psychological Medicine, 26(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700033699
- Missylovin, L.Ya., & Urova, M.S. (2015). Overcoming stuttering in adolescents and adults using devices such as ACORUS. Scientific-Methodological Electronic Journal “Koncept”, (S23), 46-50. (In Russ.)
- Shevchenko, A.O., & Vartanov, A.V. (2022). Comparison of the mechanisms of phonemic aware-ness and internal pronunciation of phonemes and syllables: EEG and fMRI study. Russian psychological journal, 19(4), 185–210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.4.13
- Shevchenko, A.O., & Vartanov, A.V. (2023). Evoked articulatory response during internal and external speech. Modern Science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series of “Cognition”, (1), 108–111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37882/2500-3682.2023.01.20
- Si, X., Li, S., Xiang, S., Yu, J., & Ming, D. (2021). Imagined speech increases the hemodynamic response and functional connectivity of the dorsal motor cortex. Journal of Neural Engineering, 18(5), 056048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac25d9
- Sommer, M., Koch, M.A., Paulus, W., Weiller, C., & Büchel, C. (2002). Disconnection of speech-relevant brain areas in persistent developmental stuttering. The Lancet, 360(9330), 380–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09610-1
- Vartanov, A.V. (2022). A new method of localizing brain activity using the scalp EEG data. Procedia Computer Science, 213, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.036
- Vartanov, А.V. (2023). A new approach to spatial localization of EEG-based electrical activity. Epilepsy and Paroxysmal Conditions, 15(4), 326–338. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.17749/2077-8333/epi.par.con.2023.177
- Vartanov, A.V., & Shevchenko, A.O. (2022). Psychophysiological mechanisms of internal pronunciation of phonemes. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, (1), 201–220. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2022.01.09
- Watkins, K.E., Smith, S.M., Davis, S., & Howell, P. (2008). Structural and functional abnormalities of the motor system in developmental stuttering. Brain, 131(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm241
- Weber-Fox, C. (2001). Neural systems for sentence processing in stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(4), 814–825. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/064)
- Zhang, N., Yin, Y., Jiang, Y., & Huang, C. (2022). Reinvestigating the neural bases involved in speech production of stutterers: An ALE meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 12(8), 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081030
Supplementary files

