Hightech industries for an innovative economy: Expert opinions
- Authors: Kliucharev G.A.1,2, Chursina A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
- National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute
- Issue: Vol 21, No 1 (2021)
- Pages: 68-83
- Section: Contemporary society: the urgent issues and prospects for development
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2272/article/view/322740
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-1-68-83
- ID: 322740
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The most important aspect of the transition to the knowledge society is the interaction of science and industry. The article considers the ‘triple helix’ theory as a basis for managing the innovative economy. The interaction of science and business can provide Russia with larger incomes, especially provided the state participation in the country’s innovative economic development. The authors analyze official documents regulating the cooperation of universities, research institutions and innovative enterprises, and the features of financing this cooperation. The article is based on the databases of the monitoring research of the Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS ‘Continuous education and knowledge- intensive industries: Institutions and practices of interaction’ which was conducted with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation. On the basis of 100 expert interviews conducted in 2017- 2019 in 12 regions of the Russian federal districts with key figures of innovation processes (chief engineers, leading designers, rectors, ministers, heads of development institutions, venture funds, technoparks and special economic zones), the authors describe the practices of interaction of scienceintensive companies with other participants of the innovative economy. In the framework of the triple helix theory, the authors consider the interaction of knowledge-intensive enterprises with higher educational institutions, the main challenges these enterprises face, investment legislation and risks of investment in scientific research. The authors argue that the state policy in this field needs a network of subjects that would ensure a dialogue between the state, science, business and education at different stages of creating and promoting innovative products. The authors also consider some issues of the development of innovation infrastructure, and possibilities of using the experience of other countries.
Keywords
About the authors
G. A. Kliucharev
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS; National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute
Author for correspondence.
Email: Kliucharev@mail.ru
руководитель Центра социологии образования и науки Института социологии Федерального научно-исследовательского социологического центра Российской академии наук; профессор кафедры философии, социологии и политологии им. Г.С. Арефьевой Национального исследовательского университета «Московский энергетический институт»; доктор философских наук
Krzhizhanovskogo St., 24/35-5, Moscow, 117218, Russia; Krasnokazarmennaya St., 14, Moscow, 111250, RussiaA. V. Chursina
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
Email: anna.chiursina@gmail.com
младший научный сотрудник Центра социологии образования и науки Института социологии
Krzhizhanovskogo St., 24/35-5, Moscow, 117218, RussiaReferences
- Bagirova K.E. Ot informatsionnogo obshhestva k obshhestvu znanija [From the information society to the knowledge society]. Izvestija Saratovskogo Universiteta. Serija: Sotsiologija. Politologija. 2015; 1. (In Russ.).
- Bunjak N.M. Predprinimatelsky universitet: sushhnost i osobennosti formirovanija [Entrepreneurial university: Essence and features of development]. Juvenis Scientia. 2016; 2. (In Russ.).
- Danilova E.A. Innovatsionnaja politika Rossijskoj Federatsii: vnutri- i vneshnepoliticheskie aspekty [Innovative policy of the Russian Federation: Domestic and foreign-policy aspects]. Vestnik TGU. Filosofija. Sotsiologija. Politologija. 2013; 3. (In Russ.).
- Dezhina I.G. Osobennosti rossijskoj “trojnoj spirali” otnoshenij mezhdu gosudarstvom, naukoj i biznesom [Features of the Russian ‘triple helix’ between the state, science and industry]. Innovatsii. 2011; 4. (In Russ.).
- Ershova V.Ju. Rol klasterov v razvitii ekonomiki [The role of clusters in the economic development]. Nauchnye Issledovaniya v Obrazovanii. 2012; 7. (In Russ.).
- Zhikharev K.L. Regionalnye innovatsionnye sistemy i institutsionalnye uslovija innovatsionnogo razvitija [Regional innovation systems and institutional conditions for innovative development]. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.).
- Zavijalov D.V., Zavijalova N.B. Printsipy uspeshnosti innovatsionnyh vysokotehnologichnyh klasterov [Principles of success for innovative high-tech clusters]. Rossiyskoe Predprinimatelstvo. 2012; 10. (In Russ.).
- Ivashhenko N.P., Pospelova T.V. Protsess formirovanija predprinimatelskih universitetov v Rossii [The process of formation of entrepreneurial universities in Russia]. MIR. 2013; 14. (In Russ.).
- Ilyinov E.V., Gosteva O.V. Osobennosti razvitija naukoemkih proizvodstv v uslovijah sovremennoj Rossii [Features of the development of high-tech industries in contemporary Russia]. Aktualnye Problemy Aviatsii i Kosmonavtiki. 2010; 6. (In Russ.).
- Kolchin S.V. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskaja i geopoliticheskaja znachimost naukoemkih proizvodstv [Social-economic and geopolitical significance of science-intensive industries]. Finansovaya Analitika: Problemy i Resheniya. 2012; 37. (In Russ.).
- Poljakov E.S., Ushanova I.S. Innovatsionnaja sistema kak sovokupnost nauki i proizvodstva [Innovative system as a combination of science and production]. Aktualnye Problemy Aviatsii i Kosmonavtiki. 2012; 8. (In Russ.).
- Smirnov V.E., Smirnov V.E. Modernizatsija i sotsialnye innovatsii: problemnoe pole objasnenija [Modernization and social innovation: The problem field of explanation]. Sotsiologichesky Almanakh. 2013; 4. (In Russ.).
- Finashina S.A. Teoreticheskie aspekty formirovanija novyh tipov klasterov s vysokim innovatsionnym potentsialom [Theoretical aspects of the formation of new types of clusters with high innovative potential]. Prostranstvo Ekonomiki. 2012; 4–2. (In Russ.).
- Boardman C., Gray D. The new science and engineering management: Cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2010; 35.
- Casas R., de Gortari R., Santos M.J. The building of knowledge spaces in Mexico. A regional approach to networking. Research Policy. 2000; 29.
- Casper S. Creating Silicon Valley in Europe. Public Policies towards New Technology Industries. Oxford; 2007.
- Dumitru M., Alexandru G. Linking the triple helix (university-industry-government) to the quadruple helix of university-industry-government — civil society in the field of international business and economics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 2018; 12 (1).
- Etzkowitz H. Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information. 2003; 42.
- Etzkowitz H. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London; 2002.
- Etzkowitz H. Technology transfer: The second academic revolution. Technology Access Report. 1993; 6.
- Etzkowitz H. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. London; 2008.
- Etzkowitz H., Ranga M., Benner M., Guaranys L., Maculan A.M., Kneller R. Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: Towards a global convergence. Science and Public Policy. 2008; 35.
- Geoghegan-Quinn M. From Innovation Emergency to Economic Growth. URL: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/12/226&type=html.
- Hekkert M., Suurs R.A.A., Negro S., Kuhlmann S., Smits R. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2008; 74.
- Kerry C., Dandon M. Open innovation, triple helix and regional innovation systems. Industry and Higher Education. 2016; 30 (1).
- Leydesdorff L., Fritsch M. Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a triple helix dynamics. Research Policy. 2006; 35 (10).
- Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education. 2013; 27 (4).
Supplementary files
