British and American Political Cartoons in Sociocultural Context
- Authors: Pavlina S.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- HSE University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 61-76
- Section: DISCOURSE STUDIES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2299/article/view/323536
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2025-16-1-61-76
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PKSTWQ
- ID: 323536
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This research is set in the framework of sociolinguistics and employs the Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis. The article contains the contrastive analysis of British and American political cartoons that are viewed as multimodal texts embedded in social and cultural landscapes. To shape their messages the authors employ verbal, iconic, graphical and colour codes which interact with each other and broad contexts building intersemiotic and intertextual ties. So far these aspects haven’t been studied in regard to different variants of one and the same language. The present research aims to fill this gap in modern scholarship. The sample includes 150 British and 150 American political cartoons published by The Guardian and US Today in 2020-2021. The analysis of British and American cartoons reveals that their authors tend to use similar resources to make the cartoons appealing, such as grotesque, visual metaphor, bisociation and periphrasis. The difference lies in their employment of the graphical mode. British cartoonists use it to express different prosodic features, to allude to some musical context, which makes British cartoons more polyphonic than American ones. The research also revealed marked differences in sources of intertextuality that encompass national symbols, historical background, symbols of power. However, both British and American cartoons tend to draw on similar elements of world cultural heritage, using Bible as a prior text.
Keywords
About the authors
Svetlana Yu. Pavlina
HSE University
Author for correspondence.
Email: spavlina@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8304-795X
SPIN-code: 1087-2959
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of Departments of Theory and ead of the Department of Foreign Languages and Professional Communication, Faculty of Humanities
25/12 Bolshaya Pecherskaya street, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation, 603155References
- Chudinov, A.P. (2006). Political Linguistics. Moscow: Flinta. (In Russ.). EDN: SDQKXT
- Denisova, G.L. (2018). The category of time in political cartoons. World of Linguistics and Communication: Electronic Scientific Journal, (3), 51–69. (In Russ.). EDN: YLAHLN
- El Rafaie, E. (2013). Metaphor in political cartoons: exploring audience responses. In: Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Raskin, V. (2008). The Primer of Humor Research. De Gruyter Mouton.
- Cadiero-Kaplan, K. (2002). Literacy ideologies: Critically engaging the language arts Curriculum. Language Arts, 79(5), 372–381.
- Denisova, G.L. (2020). Precedent Phenomena in the Great Patriotic War Political Cartoon as a Creolized Text. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, (65), 77–91. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/65/5
- Dugalich, N.M. (2020). Universal and culturally specific features and linguistic peculiarities of the political cartoons in the Arabic and French languages. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 11(3), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2020-11-3-479-495 EDN: MJCZZE
- Tsakona, V. (2020). Recontextualizing Humor. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511929
- Kleeman, G. (2006). Not just for fun: Using cartoons to investigate geographical issues. New Zealand Geographer, (62), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.2006.00057.x
- Padilla, X. (2019). Political cartoons on Greek debt crisis: a cognitive and pragmatic approach. LinRed, XVI, 1–19.
- Tsakona, V., & Popa, D. (eds.) (2011). Studies in political humour: In between political critique and public entertainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.46
- Davies, Ch., Kuipers, G., Lewis, P., et al. (2008). The Muhammad cartoons and humor research: A collection of essays. HUMOR, 21(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.001
- Chaplygina, Yu. (2006). Comic creolized texts: interaction of semiotic systems. Samara: Samara State Economic University.
- Tsakona, V. (2009). Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1171–1188.
- Kress, G. (2010). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In: The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (рр. 1–102). Routledge.
- Pavlina, S.Ju. (2019). Political Posters as Multimodal Texts. Political Linguistics, 2(74), 100–106. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26170/pl19-02-11 EDN: YETEXO
- Seymour-Ure, С. (2001). What Future for the British Political Cartoon? Journalism Studies, 2(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700120062202
- Negro Alousque, I. (2013). Visual metaphor and metonymy in French political cartoons. Resla, 26, 365–384.
- El Rafaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: the example of newspaper cartoon. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755
- Barth, R. (1977). Image–Music–Text, Stephen Heath (Ed.). New York: Hill and Wang.
- Pinar-Sanz, M. (2020). Humour and intertextuality in Steve Bell’s political cartoons. The European Journal of Humour Research, 8(3), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2020.8.3.Pinar-Sanz EDN: BWJWJU
- O’Halloran, K. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In: The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, K. Hyland and B. Paltridge (eds.) (pp. 120–137). London and New York: Continuum.
Supplementary files
