Substandard Language Phenomena in Artistic Discourse
- Autores: Korolkova A.V.1,2,3, Novikova T.S.3
-
Afiliações:
- Moscow State Pedagogical University
- RUDN University
- Smolensk State Agricultural Academy
- Edição: Volume 16, Nº 1 (2025)
- Páginas: 90-100
- Seção: FUNCTIONAL SEMANTICS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2299/article/view/323538
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2025-16-1-90-100
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DYJKKJ
- ID: 323538
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
It should be noted that in the fiction of the XX century, lexical units from various types of jargon, argot, youth slang are quite common, but the theme and communicative goal of the author of the text play an important role. The article examines the use of various substandard linguistic phenomena in the artistic discourse of the second half of the XX century - early XXI century. Since artistic discourse is a reality reinterpreted by the creative imagination of the author, then in the second half of the XX century, the use of substandard vocabulary and phraseology became necessary in a number of literary texts. Numerous linguistic studies note a certain feature: the activation of substandard vocabulary and its use in colloquial speech reduce the expressive potential of the vocabulary and phraseology of the standard, which correlates with the literary language. Analyzing substandard vocabulary within the framework of the artistic space of Russian literature of the late XX - early XXI century, it should be noted that this vocabulary has become actively in demand in works of various genres. In this context, we can note its active use in works of the detective genre, in fiction and fiction-publicistic works that comprehend the era of the Great Terror, as well as in works about youth and for youth young people. Modern research in the field of studying the substandard vocabulary of artistic discourse allows us to fully analyze the modern language space. The modern language substandard implements various functions in literary texts, from nominative to cognitive and cumulative, from the expression of emotions to vivid evaluativeness. The substandard is currently becoming a source of replenishment of the stylistically reduced layer of modern colloquial speech.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Anzhelika Korolkova
Moscow State Pedagogical University; RUDN University; Smolensk State Agricultural Academy
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: lika.korolkova@bk.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3245-7307
Código SPIN: 6560-9720
Scopus Author ID: 57222246422
Dr.Dc. (Philology), Professor, Moscow State Pedagogical University; Associate Professor at the Department of Russian Language No. 4, Institute of Russian Language, RUDN University
house 1, building, Russia, Moscow, Malaya Pirogovskaya str., 1119435; 6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198Tatyana Novikova
Smolensk State Agricultural Academy
Email: tatjana_1@inbox.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9388-2062
Código SPIN: 1191-1159
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Humanities and Mathematical Sciences
10/2, Bolshaya Sovetskaya str., Smolensk, Russian Federation, 214000Bibliografia
- Mokienko, V.M., & Nikitina, T.G. (2000). Large dictionary of Russian jargon: 25,000 words, 7,000 stable combinations. Saint Petersburg: Norint. (In Russ.).
- Baldaev, D.S. (1997). Dictionary of thieves’ slang. Moscow: Campana. (In Russ.).
- Nikitina, T.G. (2006). Explanatory dictionary of youth slang: words incomprehensible to adults: about 2000 words. Moscow: Astrel: AST. (In Russ.).
- Grachev, M.A., & Mokienko, V.M. (2009). Russian jargon: Historical and etymological dictionary. Moscow: AST-PRESS KNIGA. (In Russ.).
- Koester-Thoma, S. (1993). Standard, substandard, nonstandard. Russian Studies (Berlin), (2), 15–31. (In Russ.).
- Khimik, V.V. (2000). Poetics of the low, or Vernacular as a cultural phenomenon. Saint Petersburg: Faculty of Philology of Saint Petersburg State University. (In Russ.).
- Khimik, V.V. (2004). Spoken speech as creativity. In: Proceedings and materials: Russian language: historical destinies and modernity: II International Congress of Russian Language Researchers (Moscow, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Philology, March 18–21, 2004 (pp. 374–375). Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University publ. (In Russ.).
- Bykov, V.B. (2001). Lexicological and lexicographical problems in the study of the Russian substandard [PhD thesis]. Moscow. (In Russ.). EDN: QDQZOF
- Korovushkin, V.P. (2005). Fundamentals of contrastive sociolectology [PhD thesis]. Pyatigorsk. (In Russ.). EDN: NOKYMB
- Grachev, M.A. (2022). Adaptation of argotic units in the popular Russian language in the 21st century Neophilology, 8(2), 210–217. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-2-210-217 EDN: ZTKQRL
- Grachev, M.A. (2009). Criminal language intervention. Nauka i zhizn’, (4), 128–132. (In Russ.).
- Kalugina, E.N. (2013). Conceptual and theoretical aspect of the study of linguistic substandard. Nauchnyi dialog, 5(17), 261–269. (In Russ.).
- Ageeva, A.V. (2023). Substandard as a marker of communicative intention in French-language Internet discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice,16(11), 4097–4102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230623. EDN: XEKIYA
- Novikova, T.S. (2008). Substandard of the XX century and its contrastive artistic interpretation (based on the story by A.I. Solzhenitsyn “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich”) [PhD thesis]. Belgorod. (In Russ.). EDN: PVSXVD
- Krysin, L.P. (2002). About the Russian language of our days: The changing linguistic world. In: Proceedings of Perm University conference, November 12–17, 2001 (pp. 214–216). Perm: Perm State Universiry publ. (In Russ.).
- Kolshansky, G.V. (2005). Communicative function and structure of language [Kommunikativnaja funkcija i struktura jazyka]. Moscow: URSS. (In Russ.).
- Grachev, M.A. (1992). Third wave [Tret’ja volna]. Russian speech, (4), 61–64. (In Russ.).
Arquivos suplementares
