Language and Speech Models of Gender Stereotype Representation on the Material of the Russian language
- Авторлар: Romanova T.V.1, Tovkes M.Y.1
-
Мекемелер:
- HSE University
- Шығарылым: Том 16, № 1 (2025)
- Беттер: 117-131
- Бөлім: FUNCTIONAL SEMANTICS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2299/article/view/323540
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2025-16-1-117-131
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PBJTRE
- ID: 323540
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Nowadays, gender problematization in scientific discourse is caused by the clash of traditionalist and globalist tendencies of gender identification. Language models of gender stereotype allow us to reconstruct the structural organization of MAN/WOMAN concepts in the modern group interpretation of native Russian speakers, objectified in lexico-thematic conceptualization and categorization. The lexico-semantic way of expressing conceptual gender characteristics is the most representative; the profiling mechanism is activated by the polysemanticism of linguistic units. Speech models of gender stereotype represent a cognitive mechanism of selection, interpretation, and evaluation of verbal means, their definition area is conceptually thematic groups as a set of knowledge about gender, interpreted in a specific discourse. The conceptual transformation of gender is projected primarily onto the basic categorical structure of the conceptual and thematic field of gender-marked knowledge, where prototypical effects are directly manifested. The central definition areas of gender characteristics when describing men is the thematic block “Personal characteristics” (802 contexts), when describing women - “Fulfilment spheres” (1077 contexts). In the thematic block “Personal characteristics”, when describing men and women, character traits in the traditional interpretation become the dominant group. In the thematic block “Fulfilment spheres” the employment of women in various spheres of public life and the development of new professions are actively discussed, which indicates an increase in the importance of the implementation sphere in the structure of the concept WOMAN. Lexico-grammatical and speech representation of masculinity and femininity in the text corpus enable us to identify traditional asymmetries and certain egalitarian tendencies: overcoming discursive invisibility of women and their discrimination on the basis of intellect; expanding men’s rights in the family sphere; partial overcoming of “toxic” masculinity; expanding the spheres of social realization of men and especially women; the importance of personal fulfilment, moral motivation of behavioral reactions, successful public image for men and women.
Авторлар туралы
Tatiana Romanova
HSE University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: tvromanova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1833-2711
SPIN-код: 6424-1929
Scopus Author ID: 56556988800
ResearcherId: L-6068-2015
Dr.Sc. (Philology), Professor, Leading Researcher of Fundamental and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities
25/12 Bolshaya Pecherskaya street, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation, 603155Maria Tovkes
HSE University
Email: tovkes.m@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4714-1287
SPIN-код: 9461-4655
ResearcherId: AAL-3548-2020
PhD in Philology, External Lecturer, Department of Fundamental and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities
25/12 Bolshaya Pecherskaya street, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation, 603155Әдебиет тізімі
- Kirilina, A.V. (2019). The Designation of Gender-Related Vocabulary in the Light of Opposition of Global and National (a Case Study of the Russian National Corpus). Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2(40), 12–29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2019-40-2-12-29 EDN: LEKGSH
- Talmy, L. (1983). How Language Structures Space. In: H.L. Pick, L.P. Acredolo (eds) Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application (pp. 225–282). New York; London: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11
- Fauconnier, G. (1990). Domains and Connections. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.151
- Boldyrev, N.N. (2019). Language and the system of knowledge. A cognitive theory of language. Moscow: LRC Publ. (In Russ.). EDN: YYCNWP
- Demyankov, V.Z. (1994). Cognitive linguistics as a kind of interpretive approach. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, (4), 17–33. (In Russ.). EDN: SCKGRB
- Karasik, V.I. (2002). Linguistic circle: personality, concept, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena. (In Russ.). EDN: UGQAMP
- Kubryakova, E.S., & Demyankov, V.Z. (2007). On mental representations. Issues of cognitive linguistics, (4), 8–16 (In Russ.). EDN: IIQYOT
- Radbil, T.B. (2018). Cognitive Science. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University publ. (In Russ.).
- Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
- Tannen, D. (1991). You just don’t understand: women and men in conversation. London: Virago.
- Garanovich, M.V. (2020). Sociolinguistic variation of gender stereotypes in the linguistic consciousness of Russians: monograph. Perm. (In Russ.).
- Kirilina, A.V. (2021). Gender and Gender Linguistics at the Border of the Third Millennium. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 3(49), 109–147. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2021-49-3-109-147 EDN: DJJIUR
- Ryabova, T.B. (2001). Gender stereotypes and gender stereotyping: methodological approaches. Woman in Russian Society, (3), 3–12. (In Russ.). EDN: JVKAUT
- Zdravomyslova, E.A., & Temkina, A.A. (2002). The social construction of gender as a methodology of feminist research. URL: http://www.owl.ru/win/books/articles/tz_gender.htm (accessed: 10.10.2023). (In Russ.).
- Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive References Points. Cognitive Psychology, (7), 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90021-3
- Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
- Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of Categorization. In: E. Rosch, B.B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27–48). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032633275-4
- Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625398
- Kopotev, M.V. (2014). Introduction to corpus linguistics. Prague: Animedia Company. (In Russ.).
- Zaharov, V.P., & Bogdanova, S.Yu. (2020). Corpus linguistics. St. Peterburg: St. Petersburg State University Publ. (In Russ.).
- Cameron, D. (2014). Gender and language ideologies. In: S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff, J. Holmes (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 281–297). Whiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch14
- Gritsenko, E.S. (2021). New trends in the linguistic study of gender, its conceptualization and representation in modern English. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 3(49), 60–73. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2021-49-3-60-73 EDN: MQRQRO
- Voronina, O.A. (2004). Feminism and gender equality. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.). EDN: QOCTFN
- Aivazova, S.G. (2016). Gender aspect of mass policy. Woman in Russian Society, 1(78), 24–34. (In Russ.). EDN: VTYQLD
Қосымша файлдар
