Life of an idiom - Experimental Research Definition of Actual Corpus of Phraseological Units:
- Авторлар: Budiltseva M.B.1, Novikova N.S.1
-
Мекемелер:
- RUDN University
- Шығарылым: Том 14, № 3 (2023): LINGUOCOGNITIVE AND LINGUOCULTURAL MODELLING OF TEXT AND DISCOURSE
- Беттер: 931-945
- Бөлім: SEMANTICS AND SEMIOTICS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2299/article/view/323426
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-3-931-945
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DJYRGF
- ID: 323426
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The “life” of an idiom, the frequency of its use in speech is limited by the time frame: those elements that were actively used a hundred years ago are gradually disappearing from the lexicon of a modern person. Therefore, it seemed to us relevant and important, both in theoretical and practical aspects, to develop a methodology for identifying only those phraseological units that are used in the live speech of modern native speakers and are necessary for communication in the Russian-speaking environment today. The study was conducted on the material of idioms with somatic components, including the word heart. We emphasize that the object of our analysis were only phraseological units used in oral speech. The work consisted of 2 stages: at the first stage, a general group of phraseological units with a heart component was identified, a component analysis of the dictionary definition of the word heart was carried out, and phrase-forming semes were identified. Each of these semes motivated a certain subgroup of phraseological units with heart component as part of the general group. At the second stage of the study, we conducted a survey of 100 informants belonging to different age groups. Analysis of the results made it possible to single out a group of 25 active speech idioms units that is relevant for a modern native speaker of the language. The proposed methodology is universal, it can be applied to any other group of phraseological units, so it could allow to determine what kind of idiomatic material should be included in the Russian as a foreign language course for active assimilation.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Marina Budiltseva
RUDN University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: budilceva51@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5928-3362
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Russian Language Academy of Engineering
6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198Natalia Novikova
RUDN University
Email: novikova-ns@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9647-4184
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Russian Language Academy of Engineering
6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198Әдебиет тізімі
- Telia, V.N. (2022). Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects. Moscow: Litres. (In Russ.).
- Khayrullina, R.H. (1989). Comparative phraseology of Russian and Bashkir languages. Ufa: Bashkirskiy Gosudarstvenny Pedagogicheskiy institut. (In Russ.).
- Walter, H., Malinsky, T, Mokienko, V. & Stepanova, L. (2005). Russian phraseology for Germans. Saint Petersburg: Zlatoust. (In Russ.).
- Wakk, F. (1964). On somatic phraseology in modern Estonian [dissertation]. Tallinn. (In Russ.).
- Mordkovich, E.M. (1971). Semantic-thematic groups of somatic phraseology. In: Actual problems of phraseology. Novosibirsk. pp. 244–245. (In Russ.).
- Turovskaya, N.S. (1996). The role of metaphor in the formation of somatic phraseology with the component “eye” [dissertation]. Moscow. (In Russ.).
- Sknaryov, D.S. (2006). Phraseology of the Russian language with components-somatism: problems of semantics and pragmatics [dissertation]. Chelyabinsk. (In Russ.).
- Bogolepova, S.V. (2011). Comparative analysis of the description of the face and its parts in the Russian-speaking and English-speaking pictures of the world. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2, 32–35. (In Russ.).
- Gorodetskaya, I.E. (2004). Somatism as a reflection of anthropocentrism in the language. In: Actual problems of socio-humanitarian knowledge. Iss. 4. Stavropol: Pyatigorskiy gosudarstvenny lingvisticheskiy universitet. pp. 32–34. (In Russ.).
- Abramova, A.G. (2005). Phraseological units with somatism components in different languages (In Russian and Chuvash) [dissertation]. Cheboksary. (In Russ.).
- Rusetska, J. (2012). Conceptualization of cultural stereotypes of the soul and body in Russian somatic phraseology (involving Lithuanian parallels) [dissertation]. Moscow. (In Russ.).
- Sinitsyna, N.V. (2013). Somatic nominations in sub-standard phraseology of English and Russian languages [dissertation]. Astrakhan. (In Russ.).
- Vorobyeva, L.B. (2014). National-cultural specificity of the representation of somatism in Russian and Lithuanian phraseology. Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vypusk 5. Seriya “Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye i psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki”, 5, 214– 217. (In Russ.).
- Magomedov, D.M. (2019). Structural semantic analysis of somatic phraseological units of the Avar language [dissertation]. Makhachkala. (In Russ.).
- Vaintraub, R.M. (1980). On somatic phraseology in Russian/ Lexical units of Russian language and their study. Tashkent: TSU. pp. 51–55. (In Russ.).
- Skorupka, St. (1958). Idiomatyzmy frazeologiczne u jezyku polskim i ich geneza. In: Slavic Philology. Moscow: Nauka publ. p. 124–155.
- Novikova, N., Cherkashina, T., Varlamova, I., Budiltseva, M. & Karapetyan, N. (2020). Anthropocentrism in language. In: INTED2020 Proceedings 14th International Technology, Education and Development. Valencia. pp. 4826–4830. URL: http://doi.org/10.21125/inted2020.1324.
- Magdilova, R.A. (1989). Semantic characteristic of somatic phraseological units with components “heart”, “head”,“hand” in Arch and Russian. In: Research on general and Dagestan phraseology. Makhachkala: Dagestan State University Publ. pp. 94–98. (In Russ.).
- Romanova, E.A. (2007). Stable combinations with the heart component in English and German [dissertation]. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. (In Russ.).
- Lidjieva, A.S. & Suseeva, D.A. (2012). Functioning of somatic phraseology in Russian. Bulletin of Kalmyk university, 4(16), 71–74. (In Russ.).
- Khalilova, K.U. (2012). Somatism “heart” in the linguistic picture of the world (on materials of Azerbaijani and German languages) [dissertation]. Makhachkala. (In Russ.).
- Kravchenko, O.N. & Subbotina, I.M. (2014). Somatism “heart” as part of phraseological units from the position of anthropological approach (on the material of English and Russian languages). Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 20 (191–23), 74–78. (In Russ.).
- Magomedov, S.I. (2009). Somatism “eye”, “heart”, “head” in objectification of the world picture: on the material of Avar and Arabic languages [dissertation]. Makhachkala. (In Russ.).
- Aliyeva, P.G. (2019). Specificity of functioning of ‘heart’ somatism in phraseological systems of different languages. The world of science, culture and education, 2(75), 379–380. (In Russ.).
- Subrakov, A.D. (2021). Phraseological units with the word «heart» in the languages of different systems (on the material of Khakass and Russian languages). Prepodavatel XXI vek, 4(2), 344–353. (In Russ.).
- Bought by N.I. (2006). Semantic structure of the token coeur in the phraseological fund of the French language. In: Unity of systemic and functional analysis of linguistic units: materials of the international scientific conference. Vol. 9. Belgorod: Belgorod National Research University Publ. pp. 76–81. (In Russ.).
Қосымша файлдар
