“Overcoming Transcendentalism” in the Theory of Knowledge V.V. Zenkovsky
- Authors: Lagunov A.A.1, Ivanova S.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- North Caucasian Federal University
- Issue: Vol 28, No 2 (2024): KANT IN RUSSIA
- Pages: 332-343
- Section: KANT IN RUSSIA
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2302/article/view/325420
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-2-332-343
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XLNFLG
- ID: 325420
Cite item
Abstract
The transcendental philosophy of I. Kant had a significant influence on subsequent world thought. Not a single independent philosopher could ignore it when constructing his own theory of knowledge. There was a development of the ideas of the great thinker or polemics with them. Russian philosophers were no exception here, whose work to one degree or another reflected the ideas of the great German thinker about transcendental knowledge. This was typical both of his direct followers, Russian neo-Kantians, and of Russian religious philosophers, who were seemingly ideologically distant from him, who conceptualized the theological heritage of Orthodoxy. The article examines the influence of I. Kant’s ideas on one of the Russian thinkers, the famous historian of philosophy V.V. Zenkovsky. Moreover, attention is focused not on his historical and philosophical assessment of Russian neo-Kantianism, but on his use of Kantian ideas in constructing a metaphysical system in which he, according to his own words, “overcame” transcendentalism. Based on the analysis of the theory of knowledge by V.V. Zenkovsky, presented by him in his unfinished systematizing work “Fundamentals of Christian Philosophy,” as well as in some scientific articles, the authors draw the following conclusion. The Russian philosopher, “overcoming” transcendentalism, at the same time, actively used ideas about transcendental knowledge and tried to solve the problem of the epistemological subject in an original way. By transcendentalism he understood, first of all, the unlawful distortion of I. Kant’s ideas by followers. The thinker received, interpreted, and, if necessary, transformed the positive aspects of transcendental philosophy from his point of view.
About the authors
Aleksey A. Lagunov
North Caucasian Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: lag@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8498-6449
DSc in Philosophy, Professor, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Ethnology, Humanitarian Institute
1 Pushkina St., 355017, Stavropol, Russian FederationSvetlana Yu. Ivanova
North Caucasian Federal University
Email: isu-socf@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2375-6348
DSc in Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy and Ethnology, Humanitarian Institute
1 Pushkina St., 355017, Stavropol, Russian FederationReferences
- Zen’kovskii VV. S.I. Gessen as a philosopher. In: Collected works in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Russkii put’ publ.; 2008. P. 175-180. (In Russian).
- Zen’kovskii VV. The History of Russian Philosophy. In 2 vols. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks publ.; 1999. (In Russian).
- Zen’kovskii VV. Worldview of I.S. Turgenev. In: Russian thinkers and Europe: a collection of works. Moscow: Respublika publ.; 1997. P. 287-299. (In Russian).
- Zen’kovskii VV. Fundamentals of Christian philosophy. Moscow: Kanon+ publ.; 1997. (In Russian).
- Kruglov AN. Transcendental philosophy. In: New Philosophical encyclopedia: In 4 vols. Vol. IV. Moscow: Mysl’ publ.; 2010. P. 94-96.
- Kruglov AN. “Criticism of pure reason” in the works of P.D. Lodia. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2023;27(4):957-976. (In Russian). https://orcid.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-4-957-976
- Kant I. Critique of pure reason. Lossky NO, transl. Moscow: Nauka publ.; 1999. (In Russian).
- Hildebrand von D. What is philosophy? Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya publ.; 1997. (In Russian).
- Zen.kovskii VV. N.V. Gogol. In: Russian thinkers and Europe: a collection of works. Moscow: Respublika publ.; 1997. P. 142-265. (In Russian).
- Zen.kovskii VV. Our epoch. In: Russian thinkers and Europe: a collection of works. Moscow: Respublika publ.; 1997. P. 308-345. (In Russian).
- Serbinenko VV, Grebeshev IV. Russian metaphysics of the XIX - XX centuries: Monograph. Moscow: Runivers publ.; 2016. (In Russian).
- Belov VN. Russian European B.V. Yakovenko. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2019;23(2):133-144. (In Russian). https://orcid.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-2-133-144
- Nizhnikov SA. The work of Immanuel Kant in the dialogue of cultures of Russia and the West: Monograph. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya publ.; 2015. (In Russian).
- Oizerman TI. K voprosu o znamenitom tezise Kanta: “…mne prishlos’ ogranichit’ (aufheben) znanie, chtoby osvobodit’ mesto vere…”. Kantovskii sbornik. 2005;(1):3-13. (In Russian).
- Kudryavtsev-Platonov VD. Philosophy of Religion. Moscow: FondIV publ.; 2008. (In Russian).
- Khomyakov AS. Theological writings. Saint Petersburg: Nauka publ.; 1995. (In Russian).
- Balanovskii VV. N.O. Lossky and his metacritics of pure reason. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2023;27(3):568-581. (In Russian). https://orcid.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-3-568-581
Supplementary files
