联合手术治疗复合型盆腔器官脱垂的现代方法
- 作者: Bryunin D.V.1, Ishchenko A.I.1, Pyatkina A.N.1, Chushkov Y.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov
- 期: 卷 11, 编号 4 (2024)
- 页面: 430-439
- 栏目: Original study articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-8726/article/view/286422
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/aog627361
- ID: 286422
如何引用文章
详细
背景。尽管目前已有多种针对生殖器脱垂的手术矫正方法,但患者和医生对手术治疗的结果仍不完全满意。与多年前一样,如何提高生殖器脱垂手术治疗的效率、可靠性和安全性,以及如何根据脱垂类型和患者的全身状况制定个体化治疗方案,仍是亟待解决的重要问题。
研究目的。开发针对复合型盆腔器官脱垂患者的矫正性手术治疗方法,包括针对重度全身状况患者的治疗策略。
材料与方法。对20例盆腔器官脱垂(根据POP-Q分类,II-IV度)的患者进行了综合临床检查和手术治疗。这些患者患有类似的脱垂类型,但伴随不同的合并症。第一组包括11例复合型盆腔器官脱垂患者,这些患者接受了经腹腔镜联合型耻骨阴道固定术。第二组包括9例伴有褥疮性改变和严重全身状况的患者,采用两阶段手术策略:第一阶段进行经腹腔镜顶端脱垂矫正术(使用钛带的子宫悬吊术),第二阶段实施改良的曼彻斯特手术(或莫斯科手术,使用钛带)、阴道后壁修补术及提肛肌成形术。
结果。根据问卷调查,所有患者的生活质量和社会适应能力均显著改善。所有病例中,盆腔器官脱垂症状完全消失,无疾病复发迹象。
结论。提出的盆腔器官脱垂手术治疗方法是一种可行、有效且安全的解决方案。这些方法不仅可以快速激活患者功能,还能提供可靠的康复效果,对改善患者生活质量具有重要的医学和社会意义。所描述的技术能够恢复器官的正常解剖位置及其功能。
作者简介
Dmitry V. Bryunin
First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov
Email: bryun777@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5969-4217
SPIN 代码: 1439-3731
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowAnatoly I. Ishchenko
First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov
Email: 7205502@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3338-1113
SPIN 代码: 3294-3251
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowAlina N. Pyatkina
First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: patkinaalina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4260-9661
Graduate Student
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowYury V. Chushkov
First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov
Email: obstetrics-gynecology@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8125-1829
SPIN 代码: 6066-9273
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Abhyankar P, Uny I, Semple K, et al. Women’s experiences of receiving care for pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0741-2
- Oraekwe OI, Udensi MA, Nwachukwu KC, Okali UK. Genital prolapse: A 5-year review at Federal Medical Centre Umuahia, Southeastern Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2016;57(5):286–289. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.190601
- Reynolds WS, Gold KP, Ni S, et al. Immediate effects of the initial FDA notification on the use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in medicare beneficiaries. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(4):330–335. doi: 10.1002/nau.22318
- Hauck YL, Lewis L, Nathan EA, et al. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during vaginal childbirth: a Western Australian retrospective cohort study. Women Birth. 2015;28(1):16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.10.007
- Apolikhina IA, Dodova YeG, Borodina YeA, et al. Pelvic floor dysfunction: modern principles of diagnostics and treatment. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2016;(22):16–22. EDN: WHOVTV
- Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy: Greentop Guideline No. 21 // BJOG. 2016;123(13):e15–e55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14189
- de Tayrac R, Sentilhes L. Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1859–1872. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2177-9
- Bradley CS, Zimmerman MB, Qi Y, Nygaard IE. Natural history of pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):848–854. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255977.91296.5d
- Gaivoronsky IV, Niauri DA, Bessonov NYu, et al. Morphological features of the small pelvis structure, as prerequisites for developing genital prolapse. Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin Man and His Health. 2018;(2):86–93. doi: 10.21626/vestnik/2018-2/14
- Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2013;120(2):152–160. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12020
- Parshikov VV, Mironov AA, Anikina EA, et al. Prosthetic repair of the abdominal wall using light and ultra-light synthetic and titan-containing materials in high bacterial contamination (experimental study). Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2015;7(4):64–71. EDN: VEEDGV doi: 10.17691/stm2015.7.4.08
- Mattsson NK, Karjalainen PK, Tolppanen A-M, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life — a nationwide cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):588.e1–588.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1285
- MacCraith E, Cunnane EM, Joyce M, et al. Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(3):573–580. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04612-x
- Kim TY, Jeon MJ. Risk factors for vaginal mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy in Korean women. PLoS One. 2020;15(2): e0228566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228566
- Korshunov MYu. Prolapse of pelvic organs in women: a personalized approach to diagnosis, surgical correction and evaluation of treatment outcomes [dissertation abstract]. Saint Petersburg; 2017. 22 p. EDN: ZQFEYF
- Sung VW, Rardin CR, Raker CA, et al. Porcine subintestinal submucosal graft augmentation for rectocele repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(1):125–133. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d407e
- Shek KL, Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasonography: an update. Minerva Ginecol. 2013;65(1):1–20.
- Savelyeva GM, Sukhikh GT, Serov VN, Manukhin IB, Radzinsky VE, editors. Gynecology: national guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. (In Russ.)
- Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound in prolapse: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(10):1221–1232. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1459-3
- Fleischer AC, Harvey SM, Kurita SC, et al. Two-/three-dimensional transperineal sonography of complicated tape and mesh implants. Ultrasound Q. 2012;28(4):243–249. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182749585
补充文件
