波形环切术与宫颈锥切术治疗宫颈鳞状上皮内高度病变的疗效
- 作者: Kardava I.V.1, Zarochentseva N.V.1, Barinova I.V.1,2, Fattakhov A.R.1, Trishchenkova O.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- 期: 卷 12, 编号 3 (2025)
- 页面: 335-342
- 栏目: Original study articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-8726/article/view/350246
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/aog678850
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VPMGGA
- ID: 350246
如何引用文章
详细
论证:目前,尽管用于治疗HSIL的切除方法较多,但残余病变和复发率仍然较高,达到30–50%,与所选方法无关。此外,术后仍有多达30%的女性持续感染人乳头瘤病毒。因此, 选择一种在HSIL切除中最优的方法,以减少残余病变、复发及人乳头瘤病毒持续感染,仍具有现实意义。
目的:评估波形环切术(C-LETZ)与传统宫颈锥切术在HSIL中的疗效。
材料与方法:2021—2023年间,在V.I. Krasnopolsky Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology,对66例经组织学确诊为HSIL的患者进行了检查、治疗和随访。分别接受传统宫颈锥切术(n=32,第1组)和C-LETZ波形环切术(n=34,第2组)。
结果:与C-LETZ组相比,传统锥切组宫颈内口切缘阳性发生率更高(р<0.001)。在锥体顶端,传统锥切组更常见宫颈内口腺隐窝受累(р=0.03),且宫颈管刮出物中HSIL检出率更高(р=0.01)。第1组中有8%的患者仅在宫颈管刮出物中检出上皮内病变,而切除组织中未见病变;第2组为0%。在1年内随访中,第1组残余病变发生率为6%(2/32),1至2年为12%(4/32)。2年后在女性中复发率为18%(6/32)。第2组在随访不足1年的时间内检出的残余病变率为3%(1/34),在1年至2年期间为6%(2/34)。在随访超过2年后,第2组的复发率比第1组低3倍,为6%女性(2/34);p=0.01。
结论:C-LETZ波形环切术由于其波形结构可更深层次切除宫颈管组织,从而增加宫颈管切除体积,有效使宫颈内口切缘阳性率和人乳头瘤病毒持续感染率降低2倍,腺隐窝残余病变率降低1.5倍,相较于传统锥切术。因此,C-LETZ能够更深层次切除宫颈管组织,从而降低人乳头瘤病毒持续感染、残余病变及疾病复发的风险。
作者简介
Inna V. Kardava
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Email: dr.innakardava@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5958-5336
俄罗斯联邦, 22a Pokrovka st, Moscow, 101000
Nina V. Zarochentseva
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Email: ninazar11@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6155-788X
SPIN 代码: 4737-5826
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences
俄罗斯联邦, 22a Pokrovka st, Moscow, 101000Irina V. Barinova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: barinova.irina.vladimirovna@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0447-1734
SPIN 代码: 6145-0926
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 22a Pokrovka st, Moscow, 101000; MoscowAleksandr R. Fattakhov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Email: alexandrfattahov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5889-7696
SPIN 代码: 1269-1137
俄罗斯联邦, 22a Pokrovka st, Moscow, 101000
Olga V. Trishchenkova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: olga.kuzina.95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3384-5096
SPIN 代码: 4446-2062
俄罗斯联邦, 22a Pokrovka st, Moscow, 101000
参考
- Zarochentseva NV, Dzhidzhihia LK. Possibilities of using Cervicon-Dim in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Issues of Practical Colposcopy. Genital Infections. 2022;(3):40–47. doi: 10.46393/27826392_2022_3_40 EDN: QIMZTV
- Basu P, Taghavi K, Hu S-Y, et al. Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Curr Probl Cancer. 2018;42(2):129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.010
- Zarochentseva NV, Dzhidzhihia LK, Bashankaeva YuN, Nabieva VN. Excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasias. Obstetrics and gynecology. News. Views. Education. 2020;8(4):37–47. doi: 10.24411/2303-9698-2020-14005 EDN: ZANAFZ
- Mints M, Gaberi V, Anderson S. Miniconization procedure with C-LETZ conization electrode for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a Swedish study. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2006;85(2):218–223. doi: 10.1080/00016340500345618
- Boonlikit S, Srichongchai H. Comparison of recurrence rates with contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for CIN. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(15):6005–6008. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.15.6005
- Janthanaphan M, Wootipoom V, Tangsinmunkong K, Liabsuetr-akul T. Comparison of success rate and complications of contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (CLETZ) with cold knife conization (CKC) in high grade lesion (HGL) from colposcopic impression. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92:1573–1579.
- Hoffman SR, Le T, Lockhart A, et al. Patterns of persistent HPV infection after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): A systematic review. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(1):8–23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30623
- Zarochentseva NV, Dzhidzhikhiya LK, Nabieva VN. Recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after excisional treatment. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2020;19(2):68–77. doi: 10.17116/rosakush20232302176 EDN: PLTKZN
- Boonlikit S, Thitisagulwong S. C-LETZ versus large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(5):1173–1179. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2420-5
补充文件




