Does Russia need a fixed percentage of originality and the very originality of scientific papers: reflections of a lawyer
- Authors: Belikova K.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 62-104
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2409-7136/article/view/367915
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MGAHSR
- ID: 367915
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of research in this article is the search for answers to the following questions: if there is a need to fix the percentage of originality of scientific papers; can "new knowledge" be "born" when writing a dissertation that on 100% represents "quoting" of the works of other authors, is it legitimate, as recommended by the representative of "Anti-Plagiarism", to combine the indicators of the originality of the text and self-citation to fix the share of the author's text – as well as the establishment of the line between conscientious and non-conscientious self-citation, scientific analysis of the concepts of "originality", "independent scientific work", etc. To answer these questions, an analysis of relevant Russian and foreign legal and local regulations and doctrines is carried out. Special attention is paid to the practice of using similar to the "Anti-Plagiarism" systems abroad. During the study the author proceeds from the subjective-objective determination of processes and phenomena, using general scientific dialectical, historical, comparative legal, etc. methods of scientific cognition. As a result of the study it is concluded that the issue of plagiarism, on the one hand, becomes much broader and more complex than direct verbatim borrowings from scientific works of other authors, captured by the "Anti-Plagiarism" system used for some time in our country, and, on the other hand, requires a rethinking of the approaches prevailing in theory (doctrine) and practice to identify the "originality" by way of "Anti-plagiarism" system used in Russia and puts the question of ways to identify originality and requirements and methods, mechanisms and forms of its expression. There is a need thus for broad discussion, rethinking and finding consensus in society regarding: 1) the prevailing approaches in theory (doctrine) and practice to identify the "originality" by way of "Anti-Plagiarism" system used in Russia and the question of ways to identify originality, requirements for it and methods, mechanisms and forms of its expression, 2) intellectual property objects, in particular, copyright objects that must be subject to the openness regime based on ceasure of protection by copyright.
About the authors
Ksenia Michailovna Belikova
Email: BelikovaKsenia@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8068-1616
References
Беликова К.М. Монетизация морали как правовой способ защиты интеллектуальной собственности. // Право и политика. – 2018. – № 12. – С. 1-11. doi: 10.7256/2454-0706.2018.12.28311 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=28311 (дата обращения: 26.01.2023) Robert A. Gorman, Fact or Fancy? The Implications for Copyright-The Twelfth Annual Donald C. Brace Memorial Lecture, 29 J. COPYRIGHT Soc'y 560, 561 (1982) (at 593). URL: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jocoso29&div=51&id=&page= (дата обращения: 01.02.2023) Rollin M. Perkins. Criminal Law. Foundation Press; 2nd edition. 1969. P. 234 (1115 p.). David Nimmer. Copyright in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Authorship and Originality. // Houston Law Review Address. 2001. – Number 1. Volume 38. – P. 7 (223 p.). URL: https://opensiddur.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/David-Nimmer-Copyright-in-the-Dead-Sea-Scrolls-Authorship-and-Originality-Houston-Law-Review-v38-Houston-Law-Review-n1-2001-rev.1.pdf (дата обращения: 31.01.2023) Zechariah Chafee. (1945). Reflections on the Law of Copyright: I. Columbia Law Review, 45(4), 503–529. https://doi.org/info:doi/ URL: https://librarysearch.unwsp.edu/discovery/openurl?institution=01CLIC_UNW&rfr_id=info:sid%252Fprimo.exlibrisgroup.com-bX-Bx&rfr_id=info:sid%2Fprimo.exlibrisgroup.com-27020878-Bx&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi%2Ffmt:kev:mtx:&rft.epage=529&rft.volume=45&rft_id=info:doi%2F&resource_type=article&rft.isbn_list=&rft.jtitle=Columbia%20law%20review&rft.genre=article&rft.issue=4&rft.auinit1=Z&rft.aulast=Chafee&rft.auinit=Z&rft.date=1945&rft.eisbn_list=&rft.spage=503&rft.au=Chafee,%20Zechariah&rft.atitle=Reflections%20on%20the%20Law%20of%20Copyright:%20I&rft.issn=0010-1958&rft.eissn=1945-2268&svc_dat=CTO&vid=01CLIC_UNW:UNWSP (дата обращения: 31.01.2023) Nimmer M., Copyright § 1.10B, at 1-73-1-74 (1984). Цит. по: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises 471 US 539, Supreme Court 1985. Nash, J. (2018). Plagiarism, culture, the Middle East and Westernization: a mixed methods study. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 15(1). 54-67. https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v15.n1.287 URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.18538/lthe.v15.n1.287/full/pdf?title=plagiarism-culture-the-middle-east-and-westernization-a-mixed-methods-study (дата обращения: 02.02.2023) Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond Culture (1st ed.). Garden City, New York: Anchor Press. 316 p. Цит. по: [21. P. 54-67] Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26. Retrieved from http://www.dx.doi.org/10.9709/2307-0919-1014 Цит. по: [21. P. 54-67] Крашенинникова Н.А. § 4. Индусское право и большая индусская неразделенная семья. // Индусское право: история и современность / Н.А. Крашенинникова. – М.: Издательство Московского университета, 1982. – 192 с. URL: https://studfile.net/preview/8981632/page:13/ (дата обращения: 07.02.2023) Razek, N. A. (2014). Academic integrity: a Saudi student perspective. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(1), 143-154. Цит. по: Цит. по: [21. P. 54-67] Chien, S. (2014). Cultural constructions of plagiarism in student writing: Teacher’s perceptions and responses. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(2), 120-140. http://www.search.proquest.com/docview/1628065126?accountid=3517 Цит. по: [21. P. 54-67] Кашанин А.В. Механизм демаркации в системе копирайт США // Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law.-2011.-№ 6.-C. 45-61. Беликова К.М. Процессуальные аспекты защиты научной информации в контексте действия законодательства об интеллектуальной собственности в странах БРИКС: опыт Индии // Право и политика. – 2019. – № 5. – С. 1-17. doi: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.5.29684 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=29684 (дата обращения: 01.02.2023) Беликова К.М. Импликации сетевой экономики в праве: общие подходы и применение сетевых информационных технологий в странах БРИКС // Право и политика. – 2019. – № 8. doi: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.8.30438 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=30438 (дата обращения: 01.02.2023); Развитие некоторых институтов частного права под влиянием сетевизации экономики: монография. / К.М. Беликова и др.; отв. ред. Беликовой К.М.-Москва : Типография ООО “МДМпринт” (Печатный салон МДМ), 2021. – 564 с.; илл. Стрыгин И.Ю. Современные технологии и тенденции в изменении общественных отношений. Сети. // Жизнеустройство или как нам жить вместе? – М.: Некоммерческое партнёрство «Содействие творческому развитию, инновациям, жизнеустройству», 2006.-С. 58-59 (85 с.). URL: https://studfile.net/preview/427247/#427247 (дата обращения: 02.02.2023) Benkler, Yochai (2006), The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom (1st ed.), New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press. 528 p. Беликова К.М. Теоретические и практические аспекты правовой квалификации виртуальной собственности в России и за рубежом // Юридические исследования. – 2021. – № 7. – С. 1-28. doi: 10.25136/2409-7136.2021.7.35869 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=35869 (дата обращения: 20.06.2021)
Supplementary files
