In Defense of Narrative Identity
- Авторлар: Babich V.V.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Шығарылым: № 7 (2024)
- Беттер: 74-91
- Бөлім: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2409-8728/article/view/365156
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PKXBKO
- ID: 365156
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Over the past few decades, a number of philosophers, psychologists, and other scholars have used the concept of narrative as a basis for thinking about personal identity and ethical responsibility. It has been argued that, ethically, we should strive to achieve the unity that we discover in creating narratives about our lives. More recently, critical reactions to narrative theories have taken the form of a specific anti-narrative discourse. This article presents arguments in defense of the theory of narrative identity, based on the philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre and Charles Taylor, in whose thinking narrative is a central concept. The presented study defends the thesis that narrative identity is not an arbitrary contingent mental construct, but is necessarily present in human existence and is associated with the hermeneutic understanding of man as a temporary being capable of reflexive activity, constructing meanings, assessments, and goals. It is argued that narrative identity theory successfully addresses the problem of personal identity and the related question of the ethical responsibility of the subject by creating a narrative unity of the life project of an individual, in which the interrelationship between the concepts of personal identity, narration and evaluation is built. Section 1 analyses MacIntyre's concept of narrative and explains its significance for solving the problem of personal identity. Section 2 explicates the key characteristics of narrative identity: holisticity, intelligibility, teleology and the principle of self-care; it also provides responses to the criticisms of opponents who oppose the narrative concept of personal identity. Section 3 presents arguments in defence of Taylor's assertion that the ethical horizon of our existence presupposes the desire for narrative unity of the individual.
Әдебиет тізімі
Лехциер В.Л. Нарративный поворот и актуальность нарративного разума // Международный журнал исследований культуры. – 2013. – №. 1 (10). – С. 5-8. Кочнев Р.Л. Типы тождества и координаты личности: способы классификации современных теорий тождества личности // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. – 2023. – Т. 60. №. 2. – С. 114-132. Макинтайр А. После добродетели: Исследования теории морали. М.: Академический Проект; Екатеринбург: Деловая книга, 2000. – 384 с. Локк Дж. Сочинения в трех томах М.: Мысль, 1985. – Т. 1 – 621 с. Жеребило Т.В. Словарь лингвистических терминов. Изд. 5-е, испр. и доп. Назрань: ООО «Пилигрим», 2010. – 486 с. Lamarque P. On not expecting too much from narrative // Mind & Language. – 2004. – Т. 19. №. 4. – Pp. 393-408. Касаткин С.Н. Концепция юридического языка Герберта Харта: опыт реконструкции // Философия права. 2016. № 5 (78). С. 77-83. Левин С.М. Нарративный подход: фикция и реальность // Философский журнал. – 2018. – Т. 11. № 3. – С. 184-187. doi: 10.21146/2072-0726-2018-11-3-184-187. Strawson G. The Subject of Experience, Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2017, XV. – 315 p. Dainton B. Selfhood and the flow of experience // Grazer Philosophische Studien. – 2012. Vol. 84. – Pp. 173-211. Gallagher Sh., Zahavi D. The Phenomenological Mind. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. 2012. XIV. – 271 p. doi: 10.4324/9780203126752. Турко Д.С. Феноменальный минимализм в онтологии самости // Антиномии. – 2021. – Т. 21, № 4. – С. 7-30. – doi: 10.17506/26867206_2021_21_4_7. Lippitt J. Narrative Identity, Autonomy, and Mortality: From Frankfurt and MacIntyre to Kierkegaard, by John J. Davenport; and Self, Value and Narrative: A Kierkegaardian Approach, by Anthony Rudd // Faith and Philosophy. – 2015. – Т. 32. №. 2. – Pp. 219-230. Strawson G. Against narrativity // Ratio. – 2004. – Vol. 17. № 4. – Pp. 428-452. Christman J. Narrative unity as a condition of personhood //Metaphilosophy. – 2004. – Т. 35. №. 5. – Pp. 695-713. Christman J. Telling Our Own Stories: Narrative Selves and Oppressive Circumstance // The Philosophy of Autobiography. University of Chicago Press. – 2019. – Pp. 122-140. Ерохин В.С., Ерохина Н.В. Идентификация нормативности в нарративном подходе: преимущества и недостатки // Гуманитарный вектор. – 2020. – Т. 15. №. 4. – С. 188-194. Schechtman M. Stories, lives, and basic survival: A refinement and defense of the narrative view // Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. –2007. Vol. 60. – Pp. 155-178. Čapek J. et al. Experience beyond storytelling: László Tengelyi on the Narrative Identity Debate // Acta Universitatis Carolinae Interpretationes. – 2015. – Т. 5. №. 2. – Pp. 95-113. Кочнев Р.Л. Повесть о ненастоящем человеке: тождество личности и экзистенциализм // Омский научный вестник. Серия «Общество. История. Современность». – 2020. – №. 1. – С. 95-102. Захави Д. Я и Другой: от чистого я к совместно выстраиваемому мы // Мысль: Журнал Петербургского философского общества. – 2015. – Т. 18. – С. 28-46. Taylor C. The Ethics of Authenticity. Сambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. – 142 p. Черванева В.А. Мифологический нарратив: информационно-коммуникативный аспект // Традиционная культура. – 2017. № 1(65). – С. 76-84. Vice S. Literature and the narrative self // Philosophy. – 2003. – Vol. 78. № 303. – Pp. 93-108. Splitter L.J. Narrative and Personhood: A Fraught Relationship // Identity, Reasonableness and Being One Among Others: Dialogue, Community, Education. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. – Pp. 159-209. Rudd A. In defence of narrative // European Journal of Philosophy. – 2009. – Т. 17. №. 1. – Pp. 60-75. Тюпа В.И. Нарратология и этика // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература. – 2022. – Т. 19. №. 1. – С. 29-44. Nussbaum, M. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. – 403 p. Quinn P.L. Unity and disunity, harmony and discord: A response to Lillegard and Davenport // Kierkegaard After MacIntyre. – 2001. – Pp. 327-338. Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2001. – 602 p. Carnevale F.A. Charles Taylor, hermeneutics and social imaginaries: a framework for ethics research // Nursing Philosophy. – 2013. Vol. 14 (2). – Pp. 86-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2012.00547.x. Мысовских Л.О. Феномен конформизма: социально-психологический и социально-философский аспекты. – 2022. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://polylogos-journal.ru/s258770110023322-6-1/ Рикёр П. Я – сам как другой / Пер. с франц. М.: Издательство гуманитарной литературы, 2008. – 416 с. Кьеркегор С. Или-Или. Фрагмент из жизни; пер. с дат. Н. Исаевой, С. Исаева. СПб.: Издательство Русской Христианской Гуманитарной Академии Амфора, 2011. – С. 72-168. Davenport J.J. The Meaning of Kierkegaard's Choice between the Aesthetic and the Ethical: a Response to MacIntyre // Kierkegaard after MacIntyre. – 2001. – Pp. 75-112. Frankfurt H. Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person // The Journal of Philosophy. – 1971. – Vol. 68, no. 1. Pp. 5-20.
Қосымша файлдар
