Email this article Transformation of historical discourse and the problem of time
- Authors: Gerasimov O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara State Transport University
- Issue: Vol 20, No 7-8 (2020)
- Pages: 9-13
- Section: Philosophical sciences
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-3764/article/view/65299
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/2072-2354.2020.20.4.9-13
- ID: 65299
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the transformation of historical discourse in modern writing of history and its relationship with the problem of historical time. The author shows that since the second half of the 20th century, the representation of the past has been gradually shifting from scientific historiography, as it was formed in the 19th century, to the memory studies. Unlike distancing from the past inherent in historical science, historical memory is characterized by emotional and existential tension, the involvement of the past in the present. This became possible not only as a result of the tragic events of the 20th century, but also due to changes in the temporal regime of modern society. The linear perception of time, peculiar to a modern man, is giving way to “post-historical” time characterized by non-linearity and reversibility, which makes it possible to actualize the past with the help of memorial policy. A change in the historical time perception gives rise to changes in the perception of the past and, as a result, leads to a transformation of historical discourse.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Oleg V. Gerasimov
Samara State Transport University
Author for correspondence.
Email: oleggsmim@gmail.com
Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and History of Science
Russian Federation, SamaraReferences
- Ассман А. Распалась связь времён? Взлёт и падение темпорального режима Модерна. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2017. – 272 с. [Assmann A. Raspalas’ svjaz’ vremjon? Vzljot i padenie temporal’nogo rezhima Moderna. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2017. 272 p. (In Russ.)]
- Буллер А., Линченко А.А. Прощение и непрощение в современной исторической культуре // Философия и методология истории. Сборник научных статей VI Всероссийской научной конференции; Ноябрь 27-28, 2015; Коломна. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24874110. Дата обращения: 15.07.2019. [Buller A, Linchenko AA. Proshhenie i neproshhenie v sovremennoj istoricheskoj kul’ture. Proceedings of conference Filosofija i metodologija istorii. Sbornik nauchnyh statej VI Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii; 2015 Nov 27-28; Kolomna. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24874110. (In Russ.)]
- Люббе Г. В ногу со временем. Сокращённое пребывание в настоящем / пер. с нем., под науч. ред. В. Куренного – М., 2016. – 456 с. [Lübbe G. V nogu so vremenem. Sokrashhjonnoe prebyvanie v nastojashhem: per. s nem. pod nauch. red. V. Kurennogo. Moscow; 2016. 456 p. (In Russ.)]
- Ницше Ф. О пользе и вреде истории для жизни: в 2 т. – М.: Мысль, 1996. – Т. 1. – С. 158–230. [Nietzsche F. O pol’ze i vrede istorii dlja zhizni. v 2 t. Moscow: Mysl’, 1996;1:158–230. (In Russ.)]
- Нора П. Всемирное торжество памяти [Электронный ресурс] // Неприкосновенный запас. – 2005. – № 2. Режим доступа: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2005/2/vsemirnoe-torzhestvo-pamyati.html. Дата обращения: 08.12.2020. [Nora P. Vsemirnoe torzhestvo pamjati [Internet]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2005;(2). Available from: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2005/2/vsemirnoe-torzhestvo-pamyati.html. (In Russ.)]
- Пахалюк К.А. Историческое прошлое как основание российской политии. На примере выступлений Владимира Путина в 2012–2018 гг. // Полития. – 2018. – № 4. – С. 6–31. [Pakhalyuk KA. Historical past as foundation of Russia’s polity. Assessing Putin’s speeches in 2012-2018. Politeia. 2018;(4):6–31. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2018-91-4-6-31.
- Хальбвакс М. Социальные рамки памяти. – М.: Новое изд-во, 2007. – 348 с. [Halbwachs M. Social’nye ramki pamjati. Moscow: Novoe izd-vo; 2007. 348 p. (In Russ.)]
- Шпенглер О. Закат Западного мира: Очерки морфологии мировой истории. – М.: АЛЬФА-КНИГА, 2010. – 1085 с. [Spengler O. Zakat Zapadnogo mira: Ocherki morfologii mirovoj istorii. Moscow: ALFA-KNIGA; 2010. 1085 р. (In Russ.)]
- Ямпольский М.Б. Без будущего. Культура и время. – СПб.: Порядок слов, 2018. – 122 с. [Jampol’skij MB. Bez budushhego. Kul’tura i vremja. Saint Peterburg: Porjadok slov; 2018. 122 р. (In Russ.)]
- Heidegger M. The concept of time in the science of history. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 1978;9(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1978.11006512.
- Leskanich A. History doesn’t work: reflections on Martin L. Davies’ critique of historicized life. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice. 2018;22(1):126–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2018.1404344.
- Schmitt C. Three possibilities for a Christian conception of history. Telos. 2009;(147):167–170. https://doi.org/10.3817/0609147167.
Supplementary files
