Email this article Digital Prosecutor’s Assistant or Digital Prosecutor?
- Authors: Khatov E.B.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 10, No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 87-92
- Section: Law enforcement
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-7522/article/view/131827
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS109325
- ID: 131827
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The research examines some aspects of the digitalization of law enforcement. The author selectively analyzes relevant regulatory framework and a number of domestic and foreign examples of the use of artificial intelligence in the activities of law enforcement agencies and the prosecutor's office. He notes the problems of introducing artificial intelligence into the work of law enforcement officers and identifies the most promising areas of activity, primarily analytical ones, for the use of digital assistants by prosecutors. Based on the results of the study, the author concludes that the proliferation of digital assistant programs which eliminate routine work and increase the effectiveness of supervision is inevitable, and he also predicts the emergence of digital prosecutors in the foreseeable future.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Eduard B. Khatov
Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: khatov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4597-5728
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor; Honorary Employee of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, Senior Adviser of Justice
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Khatov EB. The state of the common information space of the Prosecutor’s office, other law enforcement agencies as well as control and supervisory bodies and courts. Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office. 2019;3(71):38–41.
- Khatov EB. Problems and principles of choosing priorities of prosecutorial activity. Modern Law. 2014;(10):55–59. eLibrary ID: 36333659; EDN: YMBWDJ. (In Russ.).
- Khatov EB. Questions of information support of prosecutorial supervision the enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2016;(4):34–39. doi: 10.12737/21246 (In Russ.).
- Khatov EB. Prospects of information and analytical activity of the Prosecutor’s Office in the conditions of digital transformation. Implementation of the Concept of digital transformation of bodies and organizations of the Prosecutor’s office in modern conditions: proceedings of the round-table (Moscow, 11.06.2019). Мoscow University of the Prosecutor’s Office. 2019:38–43. (In Russ.).
- Sukhodolov AP, Bychkova AM. Artificial intelligence in crime counteraction, prediction, prevention and evolution. All–Russian Journal of Criminology. 2018;12(6):753–766. doi: 10.17150/2500-4255.2018.12(6). (In Russ.).
- Ashurbekov TA. Organization of information-analytical and methodological work in the prosecutor’s office (on the history of the issue and the prospects for development). Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation. Scientific and practical journal. 2009;1(9):13–19. (In Russ.).
- Kaplan AYa. Neurointerface technologies: prospects for use in psychiatry. Psychological health: social, clinical, organizational and scientific aspects: collection of scientific and practical conference materials. Ed. by G.P. Kostyuk. 2017:208–211. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
