Email this article Independence of the judiciary in the modern understanding of the separation of powers
- Authors: Ruzanov I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Research Center of Problems of Interrelations between State, Society and Person
- Issue: Vol 6, No 1 (2019)
- Pages: 89-97
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-7522/article/view/18474
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS18474
- ID: 18474
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The independence of judicial power is researched from the natural law viewpoint. It is shown that the principle of separation of powers is not static, it is changing under the influence of time.
The sharp increase of executive branch of power’s role marks the contemporary stage of social-political development. It is shown that such a situation is inevitable. However, the problem is that executive branch fulfills both rulemaking function and law-enforcement one. It causes the risks of abuse of power, which scared the creators of separation of powers principle.
In this light the constitutional law faces the aim to reveal legal and political tools which can provide the very essence of separations of powers — to avoid the complete concentration of power in one center. The two innovations which can help to solve this problem are suggested in the article.
One of them is to broad the types of direct popular sovereignty. It is demonstrated, based on American experience that notice and comment requirement can restrain the arbitrariness of executive branch and therefore to be a bulwark against usurpation.
The nature of judicial power activity also changes. It must turn from formal control over the executive power to the analysis of the essence of its decisions.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ilia V. Ruzanov
Research Center of Problems of Interrelations between State, Society and Person
Author for correspondence.
Email: iruzanov@yandex.ru
Director of Research Center of Problems of Interrelations between State, Society and Person
Russian Federation, SamaraReferences
- Авакьян С. А. Конституционное право России: учебный курс. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. В 2 т. Т. 1. М., 2007. 719 с.
- Авакьян С. А.Народовластие как совокупность институтов непосредственной и представительной демократии: проблемы эффективности // Российское государствоведение. 2014. № 2. С. 4-13.
- Гаджиев Г. А. Конституционная экономика и рациональность в конституционном праве // Ежегодник конституционной экономики 2018. М., 2018. С. 18-43.
- Лазарев В. В. История и методология юридической науки. М., 2016. 496 c.
- Ливеровский А. А. Европейская идентичность: конституционное измерение // Формирование современной европейской идентичности в рамках интеграции ЕС: социальное и культурное измерения. Сборник научных статей. СПб., 2018. С. 113-117.
- Ливеровский А. А. Рациональная модель конституционного нормоконтроля // Право и государство. 2016. № 4(73). С. 43-47.
- Нудненко Л. А. К вопросу о правовом регулировании народовластия в России // Государство и право. 2012. № 7. С. 13-21.
- Общая теория права и государства / Под ред. Нерсесянца В. С. М., 1999. 552 с.
- Тюнина И. И., Тюнин Е. А. Развитие консультативных институтов непосредственной демократии в субъектах Российской Федерации // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия «Право». 2010. № 1. С. 27-38.
- Чиркин В. Е. Публичная власть. М., 2005. 174 с.
- Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule, The New Coke: On the Plural Aims of Administrative Law 2015 SUP. CT. REV. 41, 42-43.
- Candeub D. A.Tyranny and administrative law // Arizona law review. Vol. 59:49. (2017).
- Fuller Lon L. The morality of law (rev. ed. 1969).
- Gersen J. & Vermeule A. Thin Rationality Review, 114 Mich. L. Rev. 1355 (2016).
- Jonathan S. Masur & Eric A. Posner, Norming in administrative law // Coase-Sandor institute for law and economics working paper № 840.
- Lawson G. The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State, 107 HARV. L. REV. 1231, 1237-49 (1994).
- Nou J. Regulatory textualism // Duke Law Journal. Vol. 65:81 (2015).
Supplementary files
