Ordinary Interpretation of Constitutional Norms Regarding the Definition of the Concept of “Digital Ruble”

AIM: To identify the features of a legal structure “ordinary interpretation” by understanding and explaining constitutional norms, considering the increasing penetration of digital thesaurus elements into the lexicon of the country’s population. It also attempts to propose specific organizational and legal mechanisms for the formation of sustainable lawful behavior of subjects of law who do not have sufficient legal competence.

PROCEDURE AND METHODS: The study uses general scientific methodology (methods of system analysis, synthesis, dialectical, formal-logical) and special legal research methods (comparative legal, historical-legal, formal legal), questionnaire and interviewing methods, information-analytical, and mathematical.

RESULTS: The theoretical, methodological, scientific, and practical aspects of the everyday interpretation of constitutional norms in terms of defining the concept of “digital ruble” are presented. An assessment and forecasts are provided for improving the legal interpretation of constitutional norms in terms of deriving the structure of the right to carry out ordinary interpretation.

THEORETICAL AND/OR PRACTICAL INNOVATIVENESS: Legal theory and practice complement new provisions on the essence and features of ordinary interpretation as the constitutional right of every person who is not a lawyer to understand and explain the law. Key positions are put forward for the development of the doctrine of interpretation of legal norms and an in-depth conceptual study of a category of the digital ruble. Proposals are made to improve the legal regulation of ordinary interpretation based on individual understanding of legal norms in terms of legislative regulation of ruble ranges.