Email this article The Exemption From Duty of Proof: Institutional Framework
- Authors: Denisova N.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of legislation and comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 11, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 83-89
- Section: Private law
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-7522/article/view/280715
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS630880
- ID: 280715
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The fundamental importance of the category «legal institution» not only for legal science, but also for practice determines the relevance of conducting research aimed at systematizing and categorizing legal phenomena. In the field of civil procedural law, one of such phenomena is exemption from proof, the issue of independence of which has not been resolved in the procedural doctrine. In this regard, the author, based on general theoretical research, reveals the concept of a legal institution and explores the legal regulation of the grounds for exemption from evidence in civil proceedings, paying special attention to the relationship of the rules on exemption from duty of proof with other institutions and categories of civil proceedings.
Based on the results of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to identify a set of norms dedicated to exemption from evidence as an independent institution.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Natalia A. Denisova
Institute of legislation and comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: natashdenisova@bk.ru
postgraduate
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Sherstyuk VM. The notion of the system of civil procedural law. Hellard of Civil Procedure. 2021;11(4):10–28. (In Russ.) EDN: CKLGCD doi: 10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-4-13-26
- Sherstyuk MV. The system of Soviet civil procedural law. Theory issues. Moscow: Moscow University Publishing House; 1989. (In Russ.)
- Sherstyuk MV. Main problems of the system of civil procedural law [dissertation]. Moscow: Moscow State University named after. M.V. Lomonosov; 1989. (In Russ.)
- Kirimova EA. Legal Institute: theoretical and legal research [dissertation]. Saratov State Academy of Law. Saratov; 1998. (In Russ.)
- Alekseev SS. The structure of Soviet law. Moscow: Legal literature; 1975. EDN: SIFYIL (In Russ.)
- Matskevich PN. Prejudice in civil and administrative proceedings in Russia [dissertation abstract]. Moscow; 2017. EDN: XTCGFD (In Russ.)
- Reshetnikova I.V. Course on the law of evidence in Russian civil proceedings. Moscow: NORM: INFRA-M; 2000. EDN: MPSJSX (In Russ.)
- Afanasyev SF, Baulin OV, Lukyanova IN, et al.; Fokina MA, editor. Course of evidence law: civil process, arbitration process. Moscow: Statute; 2014. EDN: VNGXBP (In Russ.)
- Treushnikov MK. Forensic evidence. Moscow: Gorodets; 2004. EDN: QVSDUL (In Russ.)
- Baulin OV. Burden of proof in civil cases: [dissertation]. Moscow; 2005. EDN: NNPUUD (In Russ.)
- Morozov AS. The presumption of innocence of the taxpayer is a fiction of tax law. Legislation. 2002;(2):40–42. (In Russ.)
- Yudelson KS. The problem of evidence in Soviet civil proceedings. Moscow: Gosyurizdat; 1951. (In Russ.)
- Volkov IM. Proving negative facts: interpretation of Articles 81 and 366 of the Charter of Civil Proceedings. Legal Bulletin. 1889;(5):538–543. (In Russ.)
- Annenkov K. Experience of commentary on the statute of civil proceedings. Vol. 2. Saint Petersburg: Publishing house of M. Stasyulevich; 1878–1887. (In Russ.)
- Gilev KE. Approaches to proving negative facts. Issues of Russian justice. 2021;(15):689–702. (In Russ.) EDN: SJTLCO
- Afanasyev SF, Katukova SYu. On proving negative facts and the possibility of using the fiction of confession when justifying them in civil cases. Russian Justice. 2011;(3):69–72. EDN: NTXWVL (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
