Email this article Criminological and legal value of the highest position in the criminal hierarchy as characteristics of the social status of the subject of the crime and the personality of the criminal
- Authors: Karavaeva I.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Higher School of Economics
- Issue: Vol 7, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 64-71
- Section: Criminal law
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-7522/article/view/33798
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS33798
- ID: 33798
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The appearance of article 210.1 in the criminal law caused an active discussion in the scientific community and many critical comments. Supporting the idea of the legislator about the need to strengthen the fight against organized crime by criminal legal means, the author notes the failure of the wording used in this norm, the complexity of its practical application, and the violation of the fundamental principles of legality, justice, and guilt. These criticisms are analyzed using the criminal legal approach, which allows projecting the provisions of the criminal law on the criminological plane. Thus, the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, being a special feature of crime, characterizes its social status within the framework of criminal interactions. In addition, the status and role characteristics of the subject have the value of the criminal’s personal characteristics. Given the criminological doctrine of the criminal, the author formulates the concept of the individual special subject of the crime as a specific sociocriminological personality type characterized, as a rule, a high degree of public danger, which is based on the relationship between the social status and role of the offender with criminal threats, a wide range of victimization, criminal commitment, legal nihilism, and capabilities and skills to counteract the preliminary investigation. In support of this definition, the author analyzes the features of the sociodemographic and value-normative subsystems of the personality of a special subject of crime and argues for the relationship with the personality of the criminal as a private with a general one. Justifying the typologization of the personality of a special subject of crime into «socialized» and «non-socialized» types, the author refers to the second person who occupies the highest position in the criminal hierarchy.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Iulia S. Karavaeva
Higher School of Economics
Author for correspondence.
Email: IUSKaravaeva@hse.ru
SPIN-code: 6690-1648
ResearcherId: Z-1624-2019
candidate of law, associate Professor of the Department of civil and business law
Russian Federation, 614000 Perm, Studencheskaya St., 38.References
- Yakusheva T.V. Zakonodatel'naya reglamentaciya i praktika privlecheniya k ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za organizaciyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoj organizacii): diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Moscow, 2016. P. 110-111. (In Russ.).
- Grigor'ev D.A. Ugolovno-pravovoe opredelenie lic, obladayushchih vliyaniem na prestupnuyu sredu. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika. 2017;1(39):64-67. (In Russ.).
- Bychkov V.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya harakteristika vysshego polozheniya v prestupnoj ierarhii (stat'ya 210.1 UK RF). Vestnik Moskovskoj akademii Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federacii. 2019;(3):26-31. (In Russ.).
- Grishko A.Ya. Kriminologicheskaya harakteristika lica, zanimayushchego vysshee polozhenie v prestupnoj ierarhii (chast' 4 stat'i 210 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii). Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2016;3(94):84-88. (In Russ.).
- Burlakov V.N., Shchepel'kov A.F. Vysshee polozhenie v prestupnoj ierarhii kak osnovanie ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti. Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdejstvie i ego rol' v preduprezhdenii prestupnosti (IV Saratovskie ugolovno-pravovye chteniya): materialy IV Vseross. nauch.-prakt. konf., Saratov, 30 sent. – 01 okt. 2019 g. Saratov, 2019. P. 81-85. (In Russ.).
- Grishko A.Ya. Osobo kvalificiruyushchij priznak sozdaniya prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoj organizacii). Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. 2017;2(38):82-85. (In Russ.).
- Shesler A.V. «Vor v zakone»: kriminal'nyj status ili osnovanie ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta. 2020;1(42):110-123. (In Russ.).
- Ivanchin A.V. Optimizaciya ugolovno-pravovyh sredstv bor'by s organizovannoj prestupnost'yu: kriticheskij analiz aktual'nyh iniciativ. Vestnik YArGU. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2019;2(48):54-58. (In Russ.).
- Safronova E.V., Loba V.E. «Opasnoe sostoyanie lichnosti» kak kriminologicheskaya kategoriya. Kriminologicheskij zhurnal Bajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2014;(2):10-17. (In Russ.).
- Bavsun M.V., Marcev A.I. Celesoobraznost' v ugolovnom prave. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. 2003;4(249):94-106. (In Russ.).
- Ratinov A.R. Lichnost' prestupnika i problema cennosti. Voprosy bor'by s prestupnost'yu. Moscow. 1978;(29):101-113.. (In Russ.).
- Nomokonov V.A. O probleme izucheniya prichin prestupnosti. Voprosy bor'by s prestupnost'yu. Moscow. 1986;(44):3-9. (In Russ.).
- Dolgova A.I. Prestuplenie i lichnost' prestupnika v svete izucheniya prichin prestupnosti. Voprosy bor'by s prestupnost'yu. Moscow. 1979;(30):3-16. (In Russ.).
- Gercenzon A.A. Ugolovnyj zakon i lichnost' prestupnika. Moscow, 1968. P. 45. (In Russ.).
- Kon I.S. Sociologiya lichnosti. Moscow, 1967. P. 7. (In Russ.).
- Nemirovskij V.G. Sociologiya cheloveka: ot klassicheskih k postneklassicheskim podhodam. Moscow, 2008. P. 109. (In Russ.).
- Rubinshtejn S.L. Problemy obshchej psihologii. Moscow, 1973. P. 153-154. (In Russ.).
- Karavaeva Yu.S. Special'nyj sub"ekt prestupleniya: kriminologo-pravovoj podhod: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk: OmA MVD Rossii, 2017. (In Russ.).
- Karasik V.I. Yazyk social'nogo statusa. Moscow: ITDGK «Gnozis», 2002. P. 10. (In Russ.).
- Merton R. Social'naya teoriya i social'naya struktura. Moscow, 2006. P. 540. (In Russ.).
- Shibutani T. Social'naya psihologiya. Rostov n/Donu, 1999. P. 59. (In Russ.).
- Kogan M.S. Chelovecheskaya deyatel'nost' (Opyt sistemnogo analiza). Moscow, 1974. P. 255. (In Russ.).
- Panova N. Predostavlenie l'got i preimushchestv ili pokrovitel'stvo v inoj forme kak priznak sostava nezakonnogo uchastiya v predprinimatel'skoj deyatel'nosti (obobshchenie sudebno-sledstvennoj praktiki). Ugolovnoe pravo. 2015;(4):46-51. (In Russ.).
- Starkov O.V. Kriminologicheskie problemy ispolneniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. Moscow, 1998. P. 45. (In Russ.).
- Sal'nikova S.V., Shul'ga V.I. Socio-kriminologicheskaya i pravovaya ocenka deyatel'nosti organizovannyh gruppirovok kriminal'noj napravlennosti: monografiya. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostochnogo un-ta, 2004. P. 251-252. (In Russ.).
- Pechegin D.A. Object And Subject Of Foreign Exchange Crimes Involving Avoidance Of Repatriation Obligation Discharge // Financial law. 2017. № 11. P. 39-42.
Supplementary files
