Email this article Doctrinal basis of the Soviet law science —epistemological and praxeological dimensions
- Authors: Apolski E.A.1, Mordovtsev A.Y.1,2, Mamychev A.Y.3
-
Affiliations:
- Rostov Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
- Rostov branch of the Russian State University of Justice
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Issue: Vol 7, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 45-53
- Section: Political and Legal Doctrines
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-7522/article/view/52837
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS52837
- ID: 52837
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The article considers the Soviet dissertation theoretical and legal doctrines as a scientific category with a set of specific features. The author draws attention to the fact that the massive layer of legal theoretical knowledge known as Soviet jurisprudence and the legal teachings reflecting the evolution of Soviet law are insufficiently studied in ontological and epistemological terms. In specific, the role, place, and significance of Soviet dissertation legal theoretical teachings are lacking in the literature. Moreover, the Marxist methodology of legal knowledge, which should be used in modern educational and scientific space, lacks clear assessment. The author analyzes the most important thesis on the theory of law, which reflect the ontological and methodological foundations of the Soviet law and legal theory presented in the theses. This article lays the basis and the vector of further development of Soviet jurisprudence. These dissertation doctrines are analyzed to further use them in the scientific research of laws and trends in the development of Soviet legal thought. The results of these analyses are crucial for the history of political and legal doctrines, general theory of law, and philosophy of law and can be used in other areas of legal (including industry) science, considering their interdisciplinary heuristic potential.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Evgeni A. Apolski
Rostov Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Author for correspondence.
Email: apolski@mail.ru
PhD in Law, Head of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonAndrei Yu. Mordovtsev
Rostov Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia); Rostov branch of the Russian State University of Justice
Email: aum.07@mail.ru
Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law; Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of Theory and History of Law and State
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonAleksei Yu. Mamychev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: mamychev@yandex.ru
Candidate of Law, Doctor of Political Science, Head of the Laboratory for Political and Legal Studies, Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Political Science on General Issues
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Apolsky E., Baranov P., Mamychev A., et al. Doctrinal and legal developments of the state law institutions in the context of the Russian legal mentality (XIX – early XX centuries). Man in India. 2017;97(23):105-113.
- Apolsky E., Mordovtsev A., Baranov P., et al. The legal and methodological foundations of the dissertation development of legal doctrines in Russia (XIX – early XX centuries). Man in India. 2017;97(23):329-338.
- Apolsky E., Mamychev A., Mordovtsev A., et al. State legal concepts XIX – early XX centuries in modern scientific discourse. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald. 2018;(3):728-732.
- Apolsky E., Mordovtsev A., Mamychev A., et al. State-legal doctrines of Russia as a scientific category: essential dimension and law-free. Contemporary Dilemmas: Education, Politics and Values. 2019;7(1):124.
- Arendt H. The Origins of Totalitarianism. N.Y., 1951. doi: 10.1057/9781137382245.0006.
- Buchheim H. Totalitarian Rule. Connecticut, 1968.
- Berman H.J. Justice in U.S.S.R. N.Y., 1963.
- Friedrich C., Brzezinski Z. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge (Mass.), 1956. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_35.
- Hendley K.A. Trying to Make Law Matter: Legal Reform and Labor Law in the Soviet Union. University of Michigan Press, 1996. doi: 10.3998/mpub.14759.
- Ferdinand Feldbrugge. Russian Law: The End of the Soviet System and the Role of Law. Springer Netherlands, 1993.
- Lubenchenko K.D. Problemy sistemno-strukturnogo issledovanija prava razvitogo socialisticheskogo obshhestva [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1978. (In Russ.).
- Berljavskij L.G. Kategorija «revoljucionnoe pravosoznanie» v sovetskom gosudarstvennom prave. Istorija gosudarstva i prava. 2019;(8):10-15. (In Russ.).
- Chzhihua V. Vlijanie sovetskogo prava na pravo KNR. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2010;(4):71-80. (In Russ.).
- Apolsky E., Kim A., Mamychev A., et al. Legal mentality of diasporas: experience in theoretical and methodological design. Journal of Politics and Law. 2019;12(4):99-106. doi: 10.5539/jpl.v12n4p99.
- Mordovcev A., Mamychev A., Mordovceva T. USSR: Creation and Collapse of the Empire in the Context of «Risk Society». Russian Journal of Legal Studies. 2020;7(1):51-58. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS35215.
- Moreeva S.N. Obzor zarubezhnoj istoriografii sovetskogo gosudarstva: analiz vlastnyh otnoshenij. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2010;(6):116-124. (In Russ.).
- Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennogo pravovedenija: [avtoref. dis.]. Ekaterinburg, 2002. (In Russ.).
- Kazimirchuk V.P. Problemy metodologii v teorii sovetskogo prava [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1964. (In Russ.).
- Asknazij S.I. Nekotorye voprosy metodologii sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1940;(8-9):73-90. (In Russ.).
- Kechek'jan S.F. Metodologicheskie voprosy istorii politicheskih uchenij. Voprosy filosofii. 1962;(2). (In Russ.).
- Piontkovskij A.A. K metodologii izuchenija dejstvujushhego prava. Uchenye zapiski. Uchenye zapiski VIJuN. 1946;6:17-59. (In Russ.).
- Javich L.S. K voprosu o metodologii juridicheskoj nauki. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1963;(5):71-79. (In Russ.).
- Syryh V.M. Struktura, genezis, sistema kak jelementy istoricheskogo i logicheskogo metodov poznanija prava: [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1970. (In Russ.).
- Syryh V.M. Metod pravovoj nauki: struktura metodov teoreticheskogo poznanija gosudarstva i prava [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1982. (In Russ.).
- Vasil'ev A.M. Kategorii teorii prava (k razrabotke ponjatijnoj sistemy) [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1975. (In Russ.).
- Shapanov V.P. Marksistskij metod voshozhdenija ot abstraktnogo k konkretnomu v issledovanii prava: [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1976. (In Russ.).
- Goncov N.I. O dialektike logicheskogo i istoricheskogo v teorii prava [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1980. (In Russ.).
- Babaev V.K. Logicheskie problem socialisticheskogo prava: [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1980. (In Russ.).
- Shejndlin B.V. Sushhnost' sovetskogo prava: [avtoref. dis.]. Leningrad, 1962. (In Russ.).
- Lubenchenko K.D. Problemy sistemno-strukturnogo issledovanija prava razvitogo socialisticheskogo obshhestva [avtoref. dis.]. Moscow, 1978. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
