Research Article Introductions in Applied Linguistics: A Comparative Study on the Use of Appeals

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction: Although extensive studies have been carried out on the rhetorical structure of research article introduction (RAI), centrality as a promotional strategy has received very little attention.

Purpose: To address this lacuna in research literature, this study investigates centrality claims and how the appeals are realized strategically and linguistically.

Materials and Methods: 60 RAIs from three-corpora, i.e., 20 English L1 corpus (written by native authors in English), 20 English FL Corpus (written by Indonesian authors in English), and 20 Indonesian L1 corpus (written by Indonesian authors in Indonesian Language), in the field of applied linguistics (AL) were analyzed. The analysis started from the step of claiming centrality found in the authors’ RAIs using the Swales’ (1990) framework. Wang and Yang’s (2015) framework was used to identify the types of appeals in the claiming centrality.

Results: This study indicates that the three groups of authors use four types of appeals, namely the appeal to salience, magnitude, topicality, and problematicity. The appeals appear in varied ways, i.e., referring to the research world and the real world. Although application of each appeal in the step of claiming centrality is relatively different in the three groups, some share similarities in using the appeals in terms of referring to the research world and the real world.

Conclusion: This study provides pedagogical implications for teaching academic writing, particularly in writing research articles for publication.   

About the authors

M. A Arianto

Universitas Negeri Padang

Author for correspondence.
Email: affandia@fbs.unp.ac.id

M. Haq

Universitas Negeri Padang

Email: maulluddul_haq@fbs.unp.ac.id

J. Jufrizal

Universtas Negeri Padang

Email: juf_ely@fbs.unp.ac.id

References

  1. Abdi, J., & Sadeghi, K. (2018). Promotion through claiming centrality in L1 and L2 English research article introductions.International Journal of English Studies, 18(1), 53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/1/297381
  2. Afross, E., Schryer, C. F. (2009). Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 58-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.09.001
  3. Afshar, H, S, Doosti, M, & Movassagh, H. 2018. A genre analysis of the introduction section of applied linguistic and chemistry research articles. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21 (1), 163-214.
  4. Alghazo, S. M., Al Salem, M. N., & Alrashdan, I. (2021a). Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts. System, 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102681
  5. Alghazo, S. M., Al Salem, M. N., Alrashdan, I., & Rabab'ah, G. (2021b). Grammatical devices of stance in written academic English. Heliyon, 7(11), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08463
  6. Alotaibi, H. S., & Arabi, H. (2020). Taking authorial stance in Arabic research articles introductions.International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(2), 41-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.20.2.2
  7. Al-Zubeiry, H. Y. A., & Assaggaf, H. T. (2023). Stance-marking of interaction in research articles written by non-native speakers of English: An analytical study. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 235-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26648
  8. Arianto, M. A., & Basthomi, Y. (2021). The authors' research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 1743-1759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.127
  9. Arianto, M. A., Saukah, A., Basthomi, Y., & Wulyani, A. N. (2021). Previous studies have several limitations …: Indonesian doctoral students', Indonesian academics', and international authors' research gap strategies in ELT research article abstracts and introductions. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 25-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11735
  10. Arsyad, S., & Wardhana, D. E. C. (2023). Marketing journal articles: How Indonesian scholars in English education use marketization strategy in their article introductions. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Science and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2021), 680, 2352-5398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-19-0_4
  11. Behnam, B., & Nikoukhesal, A. (2017). A contrastive study of move structure in the introduction section of physical versus social sciences research articles in English. The Asian ESP Journal, 13(2), 180-211.
  12. Chen, X., & Li, M. (2019). Chinese learner writers' niche establishment in the Literature Review chapter of theses: A diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 48-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.006
  13. Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
  14. Deveci, T. (2020). The introduction section of research articles in English and Turkish: The case of educational sciences - a preliminary study. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 119-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710233
  15. Fajri, M. S. A., Kirana, A. W., & Putri, C. I. K. (2020). Lexical bundles of L1 and L2 English professional scholars: A contrastive corpus-driven study on applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Language and Education, 6(4), 76-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.11271
  16. Farnia, M., & Barati, S. (2017). Writing introduction sectionsvof research articles in applied linguistics: Cross-linguistics study of native and non-native writers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Lingustics, 7(2), 486-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8357
  17. Gao, S., & Pramoolsook, I. (2023). A cross-cultural move analysis of electronic engineering research article introductions: The case of Chinese, Thai, and native English scholarly writers. Ampersand, 10, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100106
  18. Hamp-Lyons, L., & Heasley, B. (2009). Study writing, A course in writing skills for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Harwood, N. (2005). ‘We do not seem to Have a theory … The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap': Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012
  20. Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Palgrave Macmillan.
  21. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
  22. Klimova, K. (2017). Writing research article introduction in Italian. XLinguae, 10(1), 49-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2017.10.01.06
  23. Liao, J. (2020). Metadiscourse, cohesion, and engagement in L2 written discourse. Languages, 5(25), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5020025
  24. Lim, J. M.-H. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers' rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 229-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002
  25. Lindeberg, A.-C. (2004). Promotion and Politeness: Conflicting Scholarly Rhetoric in Three Disciplines. ABO Academy University Press.
  26. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.
  27. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Mirahayuni, N. K. (2002). Investigating generic structure of English research articles: Writing strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. TEFLIN Journal, 13(1), 22-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v13i1/22-57
  29. Msuya, E. A. (2020). Analysis of writing styles of research article introductions in EFL academic context: A case of University of Dar Es Salaam journal authors. Athens Journal of Philology, 7(4), 257-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.7-4-2
  30. Muangsamai, P. (2018). Analysis of moves, rhetorical patterns and linguistic features in New Scientist articles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 236-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.03.006
  31. Nabilla, S., Kurniawan, E., & Gunawan, W. (2020). Rhetorical move structure of soft and hard science research article introductions by novice Indonesian authors. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 49(2), 135-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v49i22021p135
  32. Rochma, A. F., Triastuti, A., & Ashadi. (2020). Rhetorical styles of Introduction in English language teaching (ELT) research articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 304-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28593
  33. Saricaoglu, A., Bilki, Z., & Plakans, L. (2021). Syntactic complexity in learner-generated research paper introductions: Rhetorical functions and level of move/step realization. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101037
  34. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genre: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Wang, W & Yang, C. (2015). Claiming centrality as promotion in applied linguistics research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 162-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.002
  37. Yang, M. (2022). Connecting the functions of lexical bundles and moves in published research articles: The case of developmental and educational psychology. Nordic Journal of English Studies 21(1), 141-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.743
  38. Xiao, W., Liu, J., & Li, L. (2022). How is information content distributed in RA introductions across disciplines? An entropybased approach. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 63-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.10.01.04
  39. Zainuddin, S. Z. & Shaari, A. H. (2017). Contextual layers in the establishment of research niche in doctoral thesis introductions by Malaysian writers. GEMA Online: Journal of Language Studies, 17(2), 146-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1702-09

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.