Writing with AI: University Students’ Use of ChatGPT

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: ChatGPT, a chatbot based on a large language model, captured global attention toward the end of 2022. With its potential to generate comprehensive texts of a variety of genres based on a string of straightforward prompts, it was soon perceived as a threat by many in various fields, including – and in particular – education. Schools across the world began banning its use as instructors started to receive suspiciously well-written essays and assignments from their students.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of use of ChatGPT among university students for written assignments, explore the ways students utilize the tool, and examine students’ perspectives on the ethical aspects of its use.

Method: An online questionnaire was designed to collect data from 201 students from private and public universities in Croatia.

Results: The results show that more than half of the participants use ChatGPT for written assignments, that most use it to generate ideas, while many use it to summarize, paraphrase, proofread, but also to write a part of the assignment for them. According to the participants, the most ethically acceptable use of ChatGPT is for generating ideas, while other uses are perceived by many as being unethical; this, however, has not prevented some students from engaging in behaviors they deem unethical.

Conclusion: We conclude that universities and instructors need to take a decisive stand on artificial intelligence in education and provide clear guidelines to students regarding the ethical use of ChatGPT and emerging technologies.

About the authors

N. Črček

RIT Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia

Author for correspondence.
Email: appstorm1000@gmail.com

J. Patekar

RIT Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia

Email: jakob.patekar@outlook.com

References

  1. Alfayez, S. F, Strand, D. A., & Carline, J. D. (1990). Academic, social, and cultural factors influencing medical school grade performance. Medical Education, 24(3), 230-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.765551
  2. Alkhudiry, R. (2022). Theory in mediating l2 knowledge co-construction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2117-2123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19
  3. Amir Abadi, S., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2022). A qualitative study of socio-cultural and linguistic factors affecting Iranian EFL learners' language proficiency. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 1(1), 33-47.
  4. Amirabadi, S. & Razmjoo, S. A. (2017). Social, cultural and linguistic factors affecting EFL learners' language proficiency: A Quantitative analysis.International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 5(17), 121-135.
  5. Bagheri, M., & Andi, T. (2015). The relationship between medical student's attitude towards English language learning and their English language proficiency. ICT & Innovations in Education- International Electronic Journal, 3(1), 7-19.
  6. Bennett, K., & Lyons Z. (2011).Communication skills in medical education: an integrated approach. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(2), 45-56.
  7. Bhatti, M. A., & Alnehabi, M. (2023). Impact of Arabic language proficiency (ALP) on expatriate adjustment and job performance in Saudi Arabia: Role of personal and environmental factors. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 59-73.
  8. Bourdieu, P., & Johnson, R. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia University Press.
  9. Credé, M., & Kuncel, N.R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: the third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6),425-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x
  10. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. Routledge/Falmer.
  11. David, F. (2014). English language proficiency as a predictor of academic achievement among EFL students. Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(9), 38-41.
  12. Gardner, Richard C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
  13. Gholami, R. (2012). Social context as an indirect trigger in EFL contexts: Issues and solution. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5(3), 73-82.
  14. Haworth, P., Cullen, J., Simmons, H., Schimanski, L., McGarva, P., &Woodhead, E. (2006). The role of acquisition and learning in young children's bilingual development: A sociocultural interpretation.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(3), 295-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668651
  15. Khalifa, E. (2012). The effects of age factor on learning English: A case study. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5(1), 127-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n1p127
  16. Lantolf, J.P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. Rouledge.
  17. Lantolf, J.P., Poehner, M.E., & Thorne, S.L. (2020). Sociocultural theory and L2 development. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 223-247). Routledge.
  18. Lantolf, J.P., Thorne, S.L., & Poehner, M.E. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 207-226). Routledge.
  19. Lantolf, J. (2002).Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed). Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Lori, A. A., & Al-Ansari, S. H. (2001). Relations of some sociocultural variables and attitudes and motivations of young Arab students learning English as a second language. Psychological Reports, 88(1), 91-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2001.88.1.91
  21. Masuda, K., & Arnett, C. (2015). Cognitive linguistics, sociocultural theory and language teaching: Introduction. In Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory (pp. 1-22). De Gruyter Mouton.
  22. Oh, L., & Kit-fong A. T. (2005). Learning Spanish as a heritage language: The role of socio-cultural background variables. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18(3), 229-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310508668744
  23. Poonam, U., Shamim, M., Priya Sh., Reddy, V., & Verma, Sh. (2023). Investigating the relationship between culture and English language learning. European Chemical Bull, 12(8),3478-3489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48047/ecb/2023.12.si8.261
  24. Razmjoo, S. A., & Movahed, M. (2009). On the relationship between socio-cultural factors and language proficiency (Case study: Shiraz University MA students). Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 59-76.
  25. Sadeghi, B., Moshtaghi Kashanian, N., Maleki, A. & Haghdoost, A. (2013). English language proficiency as a predictor of academic achievement among medical students in Iran. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2315-2321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2315-2321
  26. Sadeghi, K. (2013). Learner's starting age of learning EFL and use of language learning strategies. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 6(1), 28-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p28
  27. Thorne, S. (2000). Second language acquisition theory and the truth(s) about relativity. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural approaches to second language research (pp. 219-243). Oxford University Press.
  28. Turuk, M. C. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky‘s Sociocultural Theory in the second language classroom. ARECLS, 5, 244-262.
  29. Verhoeven, L. & Vermeer, A. (2006). Sociocultural variation in literacy achievement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 189-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00341.x
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: The fundamentals of defectology (vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Reiber & A. Carton (Eds.), Problems of general psychology (vol. 1, pp. 39-285). Plenum Press.
  32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1990). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The fundamentals of defectology (Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (vol. 2). Plenum Press.
  33. Vygotsky, L., S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  34. Wertsch, J. V., & Hickmann, M. (1987). Problem solving in social interaction: A microgenetic analysis. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to thought (pp. 251-266). Academic Press.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.