METAPHORIZATION MODELS OF EVALUATIVE STATEMENTS

Capa

Citar

Resumo

The article examines representatives of the concept of “general evaluation” using examples from the BNC. The models are identified, according to which the metaphorization of general evaluative values of ameliorative and pejorative nature occurs. It is shown that the general evaluative predicates constitute condensed conceptual metaphors that uniquely qualify the object of evaluation in axiological terms, whereas non-metaphorized variants of evaluative judgments need additional explication.

Sobre autores

Daria Kuleshova

Moscow State Linguistic University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: kuleshova7v@yandex.ru

Lecturer at the Department of Grammar and History of the English Language Faculty of the English language Moscow State Linguistic University

Rússia

Olga Smurova

Moscow State Linguistic University

Email: olsmurova@yandex.ru

PhD (Philology), Assistant Professor at the Department of Grammar and History of the English Language Faculty of the English language Moscow State Linguistic University

Rússia

Bibliografia

  1. Boldyrev, N. N. (2007). Knowledge representation in the system of language. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, (4), 19–29. (In Russ.)
  2. Telia, V. N. (1988). Metafora v yazyke i tekste. Metaphor in language and text. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  3. Wolf, E. M. (2002). Funktsionalnaya semantika otsenki. Functional semantics of evaluation. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)
  4. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, 202–251.
  5. Arutyunova, N. D. (1999). Jazyk i mir cheloveka. Language and the human world. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kultury. (In Russ.)
  6. Boldyrev, N. N. (2016). The typology of concepts and linguistic interpretation. Novaja Rossija: tradicii i innovacii v jazyke i nauke o jazyke (pp. 16–25): materialy dokladov i soobshhenij Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvjashhennoj jubileju Zasluzhennogo dejatelja nauki RF, doktora filologicheskih nauk, professora L. G. Babenko. Moscow, Ekaterinburg: Kabinetnyj uchenyj. (In Russ.)
  7. Boldyrev, N. N. (2010). Yazykovaya otsenka v kontekste poznavatelnykh protsessov. Linguistic evaluation in the context of cognitive processes. Non multum, sed multa: u kognitivnyh istokov sovremennoj terminologii (pp. 47–56). Sbornik nauchnykh trudov v chest V. F. Novodranovoy. Moscow: Avtorskaya akademiya. (In Russ.)
  8. Arutyunova, N. D., (1988). Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt. Types of language meanings: Evaluaion. Event. Fact. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  9. Richards, A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphors we live by. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Karasik, V. I., Sternin, I. A. (2007). Antologia contseptov. Anthology of concepts (Vol. 5). Volgograd: Paradigm. (In Russ.)

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).