Abandoned Buildings in the Cultural Landscape of the City: Meanings and Practices
- Authors: Lavrenova O.A1
-
Affiliations:
- INION RAS
- Issue: Vol 89, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 858–868
- Section: ВЗГЛЯД ГЕОГРАФА
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-5566/article/view/375929
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697525050115
- ID: 375929
Cite item
Abstract
Abandoned buildings (“abandonments”) as elements of the cultural landscape are the objects with a special semantic status that carry traces of memory of their former functionality, and of the social changes that shaped these “frozen” places. “Abandonments” act as markers of social problems and transformations. They become places of collective nostalgia and alternative historicity, opposed to the official narrative. The article examines the meanings of abandoned buildings in the existence and structure of the cultural landscape, due to new cultural practices that arise around abandoned buildings spontaneously or in an organized manner. Their study allows for a deeper understanding of the role of “dangerous” spaces in culture and the possibility of their legal re-integration into society. An analysis of the types of cultural practices in abandoned buildings allows us to identify several key areas reflecting trends and drifts in the structure of the modern cultural landscape. Informal ways of interacting with abandoned spaces are considered: from the urban explorers’ movement (Urbex), mystical cults, street art to temporary cultural initiatives (festivals, performances). Abandoned buildings are dynamic objects in which the memory of their former functionality, the creative self–organization of cultural groups and social conflicts intersect. They have an ontological duality—the meanings of dying and oblivion, and a growth point for the formation of specific subcultures.
References
- Большаков В.П. Культурные практики в процессах становления культуры // Вестн. СПбГИК. 2016. № 2 (27). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnye-praktiki-v-protsessah-stanovleniya-kultury (дата обращения 02.02.2025).
- Гречко М. Другая сторона Москвы. Столица в тайнах, мифах и загадках. М.: АСТ, 2012. 411 с.
- Грибер Ю.А. Человек и цвет: колористика культурного ландшафта // Человек. 2024. Т. 35. № 6. С. 108–123. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200724060078
- Зиммель Г. Большие города и духовная жизнь // Логос. 2002. № 3 (34). С. 1–12.
- Лефевр Α. Производство пространства. М.: Strelka Press, 2015. 432 с.
- Семёнов-Тян-Шанский В.П. Район и страна. М.–Л.: Гос. изд-во, 1928. 311 с.
- Тютюнник Ю.Г. Заводские руины как форма индустриального наследия // Индустриальное наследие как ресурс для развития. Варианты стратегий. 300+: матер. Всерос. науч.-практич. конф. с международ. уч., 3–4 декабря 2020 г. Нижний Тагил: Нижнетагильский музей-заповедник “Горнозаводской Урал”, 2020. С. 181–185.
- Тютюнник Ю. Руины и ландшафт // Проблеми на географията. Рroblems of geography. № 3–4. София, 2022. С. 45–67. https://doi.org/10.35101/prg-2022.3-4.4
- Фуко М. Другие пространства // Интеллектуалы и власть: Избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью. М.: Праксис, 2006. Ч. 3. С. 215–236.
- Харви Д. Социальная справедливость и город. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2018. 520 c.
- Шенле А. Апология руины в философии истории: провиденциализм и его распад // НЛО. 2009. № 1. https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2009/1/apologiya-ruiny-v-filosofii-istorii-providenczializm-i-ego-raspad.html (дата обращения 24.04.2005).
- Bingham K.P. An Ethnography of Urban Exploration, Leisure Studies in a Global Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2020. 280 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56251-9
- Debord G. Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography (K. Knabb, Trans.). In: Critical Geographies: A Collection / H. Bauder, S. Engel-Di Mauro (Eds.). Kelowna: Praxis, 1955. P. 23–27.
- DeSilvey C. Curated Decay: Heritage Beyond Saving. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota, 2017. 240 p.
- Deyo L.B., Leibowitz D. Invisible Frontier: Exploring the Tunnels, Ruins and Rooftops of Hidden New York. Texas: Three Rivers Press, 2003. 240 p.
- Dobraszczyk P. The Dead City: Urban Ruins and the Spectacle of Decay. London: I.B. Tauris, 2017. 304 p.
- Edensor T. The Ghosts of Industrial Ruins: Ordering and Disordering Memory // Excessive Space. Environ. and Planning D: Society and Space. 2005a. № 23. P. 829–849.
- Edensor T. Industrial Ruins: Space, Aesthetics and Materiality. Oxford: Berg, 2005b. 208 p.
- Edensor T. Sensing the Ruin // Senses & Society. 2007. № 2 (2). P. 217–232.
- Edensor T., Evans B., Holloway J., Millington S., Binnie J. Playing in Industrial Ruins: Interrogating Teleological Understandings of Play. In: Urban Wildscapes / A. Jorgensen, R. Keenan (Eds.). London: Routledge, 2012. P. 65–79.
- Fassi A. Industrial Ruins, Urban Exploring, and the Postindustrial Picturesque // CR: The New Centennial Review. 2010. № 10 (1). P. 141–152.
- Fraser E. Urban exploration as adventure tourism. Journeying beyond the everyday // Liminal Landscapes: Travel, Experience and Spaces In-between. London: Routledge, 2012. Р. 136–151.
- Fulton C. Urban exploration: Secrecy and information creation and sharing in a hobby context // Library and Information Science Res. 2017. № 39. P. 189–198.
- Garrett B., Hawkins H. And Now for Something Completely Different… Thinking Through Explorer Subject-Bodies: A Response to Mott and Roberts // Antipode Discussion Paper, 11 November 2013. http://antipodefoundation.org/2013/11/18/critical-dialogue-urban-exploration-subject-bodies-and-the-politics-of-difference/ (дата обращения 24.03.2024).
- Greco J. The Psychology of Ruin Porn. CityLab. Retrieved April 14, 2015. www.citylab.com/design/2012/01/psychology-ruin-porn/886 (дата обращения 24.03.2025).
- Kindynis T. Urban Exploration: From Subterranea to Spectacle // British J. Criminology. 2017. № 57 (4). P. 982–1001.
- Kindynis T. Urban exploration as deviant leisure. In: Deviant Leisure / T. Raymen, O. Smith (Eds.). London: Palgrave McMillan, 2019. P. 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17736-2_17
- Lalonde M. It’s too Clean to be Abandoned. An entry level guide to Urban Exploring and a story of how Ontario Abandoned Places began. Burlington: Talking Walls Photography, 2021. 172 p.
- Lavrenova O. Color Semantics of the Cultural Landscape // Arts. 2023. № 12. P. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12030111
- Lesné R. “Urbex and Urban Space”: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis // Int. J. Soc. Leis. 2022. № 5. P. 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-022-00120-y
- Mott C., Roberts S. Not Everyone Has (the) Balls: Urban Exploration and the Persistence of Masculinist Geography // Antipode. 2014. № 46 (1). P. 229–245.
- Mould O. Urban Subversion and the Creative City. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2015. 2018 p.
- Ninjalicious (Chapman J.) Access all areas: a user’s guide to the art of urban exploration. Infilpress, 2005. 242 p.
- Rowsdower Z. Fresh Rot: Urban Exploration and the Preservation of Decay // J. Univ. Manitoba Archaeol. 2011. № 29. P. 1–15.
- Soederberg S. Governing stigmatised space: the case of the ‘slums’ of Berlin-Neukölln // New Polit. Econ. 2017. Vol. 22. № 5. P. 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1240671
- Trigg D. The Aesthetics of Decay: Nothingness, Nostalgia, and the Absence of Reason. NY: Peter Lang, 2006. 265 p.
Supplementary files

