Email this article The Word of God and the Book of Nature in the Focus of Human Knowledge: Preliminary Remarks on Late Antiquity
- Authors: Kurdybaylo D.S.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Theology of St. Petersburg State University
- Russian State Pedagogical University
- Issue: No 2(121) (2025)
- Pages: 59-70
- Section: THEOLOGY, HUMANITIES AND NATURAL SCIENCES: ASPECTS OF RELATIONSHIP
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-6090/article/view/304567
- ID: 304567
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The project is dedicated to the development of a new concept of the history of science, that would account for the role of theological knowledge in the development of scientific knowledge. The development of natural sciences in the High Middle Ages and in following eras contrasted the metaphorical image of the "Book of Nature" and the Bible as a book of Revelation. However, this pair of concepts emerged in late Antiquity; but at that time it was not contradicting, but complementing each other. The 3 rd–4 th centuries AD deserve special attention, as the notions of “theology” and “physics” in a form close to the modern understanding first occurred. Until this time, the “theological” discourse was mainly limited to the metaphysical model of one or ano ther philosophical school, and the “physical” one – to the corresponding model of cosmology, whereas now the search begins for the basis for the synthesis of the entire diversity of mythological and natural scientific experience collected over the period of the thousand-year develo pment of Hellenic culture. One of the bases of synthesis is rethinking of the role of matter and material objects in their relationship with the intelligible world, which, in turn, brings out the notion of “symbol”. The article demonstrates how the symbolic method allows to integrate the cumulative natural scientific knowledge into the worldview model of theurgic Neoplatonism and into the Christian philosophy of the Alexandrian school.
About the authors
D. S. Kurdybaylo
Institute of Theology of St. Petersburg State University; Russian State Pedagogical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: theoreo@ya.ru
Associate Professor, Senior Researcher
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Gaydenko P.P. (ed.) Traditsii i revolyutsii v istorii nauki [Traditions and Revolutions in the History of Science]. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 264 pp.
- Mikulinskiy S.R. Ocherki razvitiya istoriko-nauchnoy mysli [Essays on the Develop-ment of the History of Science]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 384 pp.
- Ol’shki L. Istoriya nauchnoy literatury na novykh yazykakh [The History of Scientific Literature on Modern Languages]. Vols. 1–2. Moscow, Leningrad, 1933–34. 304 + 212 pp.
- Katasonov V.N. Khristianskaya teologiya i printsip inertsii v fizike [Christian Theology and the Principle of Inertia in Physics] Issues of Theology, 2022, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 352–375.
- Khramov A.V. «Tvar’ pokorilas’ suyete ne dobrovol’no»: Diskussiya o vliyanii grekhopadeniya na zhivuyu prirodu v svete razvitiya paleontologicheskogo znaniya [“The creature was made subject to vanity not willingly”: The controversy over the influence of the Fall on living nature and the rise of paleontology] Issues of Theology, 2022, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 376–397.
- Dmitriyev I.S. Bog-Pantokrator i Bog-koordinator: Status chuda v epokhu nauchnoy revolyutsii rannego Novogo vremeni [God-Pantocrator and God-Coordinator: The Status of a Miracle in the Scientific Revolution] Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2021, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 116–137.
- Dmitriyev I.S. «Prikosnoveniye kholodnoy filosofii» (teologicheskiy faktor nauchnoy revolyutsii rannego Novogo vremeni) [“The Mere Touch of Cold Philosophy” (Theological Factor of the Scientific Revolution of Early Modern Time)] Sociology of Science and Tech-nology, 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 28-49.
- Dmitriyev I.S. Teologicheskiye ipostasi natural’noy filosofii v epokhu Prosveshcheniya [The Theological Hypostases of Natural Philosophy in the Age of Enlightenment] Sociology of Science and Technology, 2023, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 40–60.
- Louis P. (éd.) Albinos. Épitomé. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1945. xxxviii + 184 p.
- Kurdybaylo D.S. Kurrikulum dlya teurga [Curriculum for a Theurgist]. Kaliningrad: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Publ., 2024. 202 pp.
- Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki [A History of Ancient Aesthetics], Vol. 2. Moscow: AST Publ.; Khar’kov: Folio Publ., 2000. 846 pp.
- Friedlein G. (ed.) Procli Diadochi in primum Euclidis elementorum librum commentarii. Leipzig: Teubner, 1873. VIII + 507 pp.
- Svetlov R.V. Ratsional’naya teologiya: kazus Filona Aleksandriyskogo [Rational the-ology: The case of Philo of Alexandria] Issues of Theology, 2020, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–74.
- Svetlov R.V. Antichnyy neoplatonizm i aleksandriyskaya ekzegetika [Ancient Neoplatonism and Alexandrian Exegesis]. St Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publ., 1996. 232 pp.
- Crouzel H. (éd.) Grégoire le Thaumaturge. Remerciement à Origène suivi de la lettre d'Origène à Grégoire (Sources chrétiennes 148). Paris: Cerf, 1969. 227 pp.
- Sagarda N. (tr.) Tvoreniya svyatogo Grigoriya Chudotvortsa, episkopa Neoke-sariyskogo [The Works of St Gregory Thaumaturgus, the Bishop of Neocaesarea]. Petrograd: M. Merkushev, 1916. VI + 287 pp.
- Serëgin A.V. Traktat Origena «O nachalakh» [Origen’s treatise On First Principles] The Philosophy Journal, 2015, vol. 8, no 2, pp. 44–55.
- Crouzel H., Simonetti M. (éds.) Origène. Traité des principes, t. 1. (Sources chrétiennes 252). Paris: Cerf, 1978. 416 pp.
- Kuliyev O.I. Polemika Origena s Gerakleonom [Origen’s Polemics with Heracleon] // The Origin: Journal of the Institute of Theology and Philosophy, 2013, vol. 27, pp. 68–83.
- Shchukin T.A. Chelovechestvo kak instrument Slova: nachalo monofelitskikh sporov i interpretatsii Aristotelya v VI veke [Humanity as a tool of the Word: The beginning of mon-othelite disputes and Aristotle’s interpretation in the 6th century] Issues of Theology, 2024, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 213–228.
- Pisarev L. (tr.) Origen. O nachalakh. Protiv Tsel’sa [Origen. On the First Principles. Against Celsus]. Saint Petersburg: Bibliopolis, 2008. 792 pp.
- Kurdybaylo D.S. O prirode imeni i imenovaniya u Origena i Yamvlikha [On the na-ture of names and naming in the writings of Origen and Iamblichus] in L. V. Shipovalova, I. T. Kasavin (eds.) Nauka kak obshchestvennoye blago: sbornik nauchnykh statey [Science as a Public Good, collected articles], vol. 4. Moscow: Russian Society for History and Philosophy of Science, 2020, pp. 147–152. http://rshps.ru/books/congress2020t4.pdf
- Prikhod’ko M.A. Razgranicheniye magii i religii v traktate Origena «Protiv Tsel’sa» [The Difference between Magic and Religion in the treatise of Origen Against Celsus] in L.E. Artamoshkina, I.G. Gur’yanov, D.S. Kurdybaylo, A.A. Sinitsyn (eds.) Vir hermeneuticus: Sbornik statey k 60-letiyu professora R.V. Svetlova [Vir hermeneuticus: Collected Articles to Sixty Years of Prof. Roman Svetlov]. Saint Petersburg: Russian Plato Society; Russian Chris-tian Academy for the Humanities, 2024, pp. 179–193.
- Shaw G. Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
- Poster C. Silence as a rhetorical strategy in Neoplatonic mysticism, Mystics Quarterly, 1998, vol. 24 (2), pp. 48–73.
- Takho-Godi A.A. Termin «simvol» v drevnegrecheskoy literature [The Term ‘Symbol’ in Ancient Greek Literature] in A.A. Takho-Godi, A.F. Losev, Grecheskaya kul’tura v mifakh, simvolakh i terminakh [Greek Culture in Myths, Symbols, and Terms]. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia, 1999, pp. 329–361.
- Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki [A History of Ancient Aesthetics], vol. 8, part 1. Moscow: AST Publ.; Khar’kov: Folio Publ., 2000. 832 pp.
- Kurdybaylo D. Proclus on Indivisible and Continuous: Aristotelian Physics vs Platon-ic Theology, Platonic Investigations, 2022, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 89–100.
Supplementary files
