On the Threshold of Digital Civilization: the Dialectics of Artificial Intelligence and Humanism
- Authors: Levashov V.K.1, Grebnyak O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute for Social and Political Research (ISPI) of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 4(123) (2025)
- Pages: 34-45
- Section: SOCIETY OF COEXISTENCE OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-6090/article/view/368417
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22204/2587-8956-2025-123-04-34-45
- ID: 368417
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article discusses the challenges and findings of researching the dialectics of the relationship between digital technologies and humanistic principles and values in the context of an emerging global information civilization. The authors base their analysis on contemporary theories and practices of digital society and on V.I. Vernadsky’s concept of the noosphere. This framework allows for understanding the transition to a digital civilization as a stage in the evolution of the biosphere, where human thought plays a key role. Empirical data is drawn from the All-Russian Sociological Monitoring survey “How Are You Living, Russia?” (conducted by the Institute of Social and Political Research of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences), which reflects specific public concerns regarding the widespread implementation of artificial intelligence, as well as the paradox of trust in information disseminated online. The article outlines key challenges associated with growing dependence on AI, the declining quality of interpersonal interaction, the concentration of power in the hands of tech corporations, and a crisis of trust in information. Special attention is paid to the ambivalent consequences of digitalization. While information and communication technologies (ICT), neural networks, and artificial intelligence offer tools for addressing global ecological and resource management problems, they simultaneously exacerbate social, material, and spiritual disparities and contribute to information fragmentation. The authors conclude that it is necessary to uphold ethical norms and moral humanistic imperatives, considering technological progress, social responsibility, and sociocultural as well as ethnopolitical specificities.
About the authors
V. K. Levashov
Institute for Social and Political Research (ISPI) of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: levachov@mail.ru
doctor of Sociological Sciences, director
Russian Federation, MoscowO. V. Grebnyak
Institute for Social and Political Research (ISPI) of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: oksananov@yandex.ru
research associate
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Vasilenko L.A. Metamorfozy tsifrovoi mnogosub"ektnosti: regulyativy myagkogo uprav-leniya vs programmirovannogo obshchestva // Nauka. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2024. T. 30, № 2. S. 10–24. doi: 10.19181/nko.2024.30.2.1 (in Russian).
- Nielsen R., Graves L. "News You Don't Believe": Audience Perspectives on Fake News. Reuters Institute for the Study of Jounalism, 2017.
- Levashov V.K., Sar'yan V.K. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v setyakh informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologii // Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2017. T. 87, № 6. S. 532–537. doi: 10.7868/S0869587317060056 (in Russian).
- Levashov V.K. Transformatsiya informatsionnoi sfery grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. 2019. Т. 19, № 4. S. 651–664. doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-4-651-664 (in Russian).
- Vernadskii V.I. Neskol'ko slov o noosfere // Uspekhi sovremennoi biologii. 1944. № 18. Vyp. 2. S. 113–120 (in Russian).
- Gerasimova I.A. Tsifrovye tekhnologii: realii i kentavry voobrazheniya // Voprosy filosofii. 2021. № 10. S. 65–76. doi: 10.21146/0042-8744-2021-10-65-76 (in Russian).
- Turkle Sh. Alone together : why we expect more from technology and less from each oth-er. New York: Basic Books, 2011. 379 p.
- Van Dijck J. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford University Press, 2013. 228 p. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001.
- Gillespie T. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018. 297 p.
- Dobrinskaya D.E. Chto takoe tsifrovoe obshchestvo? // Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii. 2021. Т. 12, № 2. S. 112–129. doi: 10.24412/2079-0910-2021-2-112-129 (in Russian).
- Kak zhivesh', Rossiya? Ekspress-informatsiya. 54 etap sotsiologicheskogo monitoringa, aprel' 2024 goda / V.K. Levashov, N.M. Velikaya, I.S. Shushpanova [I dr.]. M.: FNISTs RAN, 2024. 89 с. doi: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-429-1.2024 (in Russian).
- Levashov V.K., Grebnyak O.V. Ekspansiya iskusstvennogo intellekta: ozhidaniya i nas-troeniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2024. № 12. S. 13–23. doi: 10.31857/S0132162524120022 (in Russian).
- Sunstein C.R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. 251 p.
- Gnatik E.N. Gumanitarnye problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologii // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2017. Т. 21, № 2. S. 270–279. doi: 10.22363/2313-2302-2017-21-2-270-279 (in Russian).
- Dzyaloshinskii I.M. Iskusstvennyi intellekt: gumanitarnaya perspektiva // Vestnik Novo-sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya. 2022. Т. 21, № 6. S. 20–29. doi: 10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-6-20-29 (in Russian).
Supplementary files

