Editorial Policies

Aims and Scope

Предметная область журнала определяется паспортами специальностей ВАК

050201. Экономическая теория

050402. Экономическая социология

050503.  Государственное управление и отраслевые политики

Цели и задачи журнала — публикация научных работ, обеспечивающих прирост научного знания в науках об экономике и обществе

Sections

Статьи

Economic Theory

Methodology of Economic Science

From Theory to Economic Policy

History of Thought

Interdisciplinary Research

Economic History

Reviews and Reviews

Peer Review Process

• The Jourmal reviews all materials received by the editorial office for the purpose of their expert evaluation. If the article does not correspond to the problems and standards of the journal, the editors send a reasoned refusal to the authors. If the manuscript meets the requirements for compliance (including formatting standards), articles are to send for review. The reviewer prepares a review within a month in the form indicated in the appendix. If the deadline expires, the editor-in-chief can send the article to another reviewer (including asking one of the members of the editorial board for review). All reviewers are recognized experts in the subject matter of the peer-reviewed materials. In case of a negative review, it is possible for the editor-in-chief to involve an additional external reviewer within the same time frame (an additional month).
• The reviewers are not members of the editorial board of the Issues of Economic Theory.
• The review bases on the principle of double-blind peer review: the names of authors and reviewers are not disclosed to each other.
• Any manuscript submitted for review is treated as a confidential document, discussion of the content of which with third parties is not allowed.
• The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment of the text. Personal criticism is unacceptable.
• Reviewers evaluate the work according to the criteria presented in the reviewer's form, including the relevance of the study, novelty, validity of the conclusions.
• The reviewer informs the editor if a significant similarity or coincidence of the reviewed manuscript with the published work known to the reviewer is found. The found cases of the absence of references in the manuscript to works, the results of which are closely related to its content, are indicated in the review.
• Unpublished data and ideas derived from submitted manuscripts cannot be used by the reviewer in their own research.

Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts if the conflict of interest arising from competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the аuthors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work takes place. In the case of conflict of interest, the reviewers inform the editor.

Open Access Policy

The "Issues of Economic Theory" provides direct open access to its materials, based on the principle of increasing the global exchange of knowledge through the provision of free open access to research results.

The open access policy follows the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) and means that articles are available in the public domain on the Internet. This allows all users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or reference to the full texts of these articles, scan them for indexing, transfer them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose without financial, legal or technical barriers, except for those that are inseparable from gaining access to the Internet itself.