Approaches to understanding justice
- Authors: ZAVGORODNIAIA A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Donbass State University of Justice
- Issue: Vol 8, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 17-23
- Section: General Theory and History of Law and the State
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/297157
- ID: 297157
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Various doctrinal approaches are considered, which are ambiguous when using a number of terms, which include principles of law, legal phenomena, among them: justice, legal certainty, proportionality. Considering justice, its different types are noted. In Russian socio-humanitarian science it is presented in the form of general and special (private) justice. There are subjective and objective justice, formal and substantive justice. Procedural fairness is highlighted separately. The study concludes that the diversity of ideologies of modern society does not make it possible to answer the question about the principles of proportional justice, which should be reflected in law, therefore the criteria of justice contain a broad intersubjective basis that allows them to be realized in procedural justice. The analysis of theories gives the right to assert that the variety of theories of justice themselves will always vary from the priority of one or another benefit in society, which is the basis of social institutions, political and legal ideology, and the procedure for establishing the result.
Keywords
About the authors
Anastacija A. ZAVGORODNIAIA
Donbass State University of Justice
Author for correspondence.
Email: nastacija@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5120-7018
PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Civil Law Disciplines Department
Russian Federation, 9 Lebedinsky St., Donetsk, 283049, Donetsk People’s RepublicReferences
- Ershov V.V. (2018). Parnye kategorii «opredelennost’ prava» i «neopredelennost’ prava» [Paired categories “certainty of law” and “uncertainty of law”]. Materialy XII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Opredelennost' i neopredelennost’ prava kak parnye kategorii: problemy teorii i praktiki»: v 3 ch. [Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Certainty and Uncertainty of Law as Paired Categories: Problems of Theory and Practice”: in 3 pts]. Moscow, RSUJ Publ., pt 1, pp. 12-42. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gyglbz
- Presnyakov M.V. (2010). Konstitutsionnyi printsip spravedlivosti: yuridicheskaya priroda i normativnoe soderzhanie: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Constitutional Principle of Justice: Legal Nature and Normative Content. Dr. habil. (Law) diss. abstr.]. Saratov, 45 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zoavsv
- Tsybulevskaya O.I., Ryasina A.S. (2015). Nravstvenno-otsenochnye kategorii v sovremennom rossiiskom prave [Moral and Evaluative Categories in Modern Russian Law]. Saratov, Povolzhsky Institute of Management named after P.A. Stolypin Publ., 148 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vtiwwh
- Kornakova S.V. (2014). The question of the principle of justice. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual’nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya = Siberian Criminal Procedure and Criminalistic Readings, no. 2 (6), pp. 64-70. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tpxthv
- Chestnov I.L. (2013). Concept of justice in the postclassical law understanding. Pravovedenie [Legal Science], no. 2 (307), pp. 35-50. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qbkcdr
- Dragel’ L.V. (2017). Conceptual and procedural principles of justice. Filosofiya i kul’tura = Philosophy and Culture, no. 2, pp. 36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2017.2.18035, https://elibrary.ru/ygfxer
- Sen A. (2016). Ideya spravedlivosti [The Idea of Justice]. Moscow, 520 p. (In Russ.)
- Churnosov I.M. (2014). The balance between equality and freedom in John Rawls’ theory of justice. Filosofiya i kul’tura = Philosophy and Culture, no. 4, pp. 525-534. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/1999-2793.2014.4.11339, https://elibrary.ru/sctijd
Supplementary files
