Are juvenile participants in criminal proceedings entitled to testify incriminatingly?
- Authors: OVSYANNIKOV I.V.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Academy of Law and Administration of the Federal Penitentiary Service
- Saratov State Law Academy
- Issue: Vol 7, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 331-337
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/303494
- ID: 303494
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The problematic issue for theory and practice of the possibility of applying norms of the pre-trial agreement institute on cooperation to juvenile suspects and defendants is studied. The relevance of issue is due to the fact that the specified legal institution is successfully used in the practice of combating group crime, and for juveniles it is the group way of committing crimes that is typical. The legal position of the Plenum of Supreme Court on the issue under study is analyzed, its shortcomings are noted. The refusal to conclude a cooperation agreement with a juvenile in order to exclude a threat to the personal safety of a teenager from the exposed persons is subjected to critical analysis. In our opinion, in order to achieve this goal, another measure would be necessary – a ban on juvenile defendants to expose other persons of involvement in the commission of crimes. Taking into account the fact that the law obliges juveniles who have the procedural status of a victim or witness to give truthful testimony of a revealing nature, it is concluded that the right to give similar testimony to a minor suspect, accused should not be denied. The conclusion of a preliminary cooperation agreement in the interests of the accused himself and the whole society.
About the authors
Igor V. OVSYANNIKOV
Academy of Law and Administration of the Federal Penitentiary Service; Saratov State Law Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: ivover@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4226-5958
Dr. habil. (Law), Associate Professor, Chief Research Scholar of Research and Scientific Department of Scientific Center; Professor of Criminal Procedure Department
Russian Federation, 1 Sennaya St., Ryazan, 390000, Russian Federation; 1 Volskaya St., Saratov, 410056, Russian FederationReferences
- Kapinus O.S. (general ed.). (2015). Zakonnost’: sostoyanie i tendentsii v 2010–2014 gg. Deyatel’nost’ prokuratury po ee obespecheniyu: nauch. dokl. [Legality: Status and Trends in 2010–2014. The Activities of the Prosecutor’s Office to Ensure It: Scientific Report]. Moscow, Academy of General Prosecutor’s Office of RF Publ., 406 pp. (In Russ.) Available at: https://agprf.org/userfiles/ufiles/nii/2015-01.pdf
- Naumov A.M. (2021). Pre-trial cooperation agreement as an effective means of combating organized crime: the commission of a crime by a group of persons by prior conspiracy. Uchenye zapiski = Scientists Notes, no. 3, pp. 71-75. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/fqhhfy
- Naumov A.M. (2021). Pre-trial agreement on cooperation in the commission of a crime by a group of persons by prior conspiracy. Uchenye zapiski = Scientists Notes, no. 4, pp. 90-101. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mgambh
- Naumov A.M. (2021). Pre-trial agreement on cooperation in the commission of a crime by an organized group. Uchenye zapiski = Scientists Notes, no. 4, pp. 102-114. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zkggxx
- Naumov A.M. (2022). Pre-trial cooperation agreement for commission of a crime by a criminal community (criminal organization) (part 1). Uchenye zapiski = Scientists Notes, no. 2, pp. 148-166. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uzafhl
- Bavsun M.V., Vishnyakova N.V., Salykova A.K. (2022). Naznachenie nakazaniya pri dosudebnom soglashenii o sotrudnichestve (soglashenii o sotrudnichestve) po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Respubliki Kazakhstan [Sentencing under a Pre-Trial Agreement on Cooperation (Agreement on Cooperation) under the Criminal Legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan]. St. Petersburg, St.-Petersburg university of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ., 188 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xavjlb
- Novikov S.A. (2013). Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: raz”yasneniya polucheny, no problemy ostalis’ [Pre-trial cooperation agreement: clarifications received, but problems remain]. Rossiiskii sud’ya = Russian Judge, no. 2, pp. 42-46. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uhviwb
- Ovsyanikov I.V. (2016). Is a pre-trial cooperation agreement with a minor permissible? Zakonnost’ [Legitimacy], no. 6, pp. 57-60. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/weanxh
- Teregulova A.I. (2019). Obespechenie prav i zakonnykh interesov nesovershennoletnikh podozrevaemykh, obvinyaemykh v kontekste ratsionalizatsii stadii predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Ensuring the Rights and Legitimate Interests of Juvenile Suspects Accused in the Context of the Rationalization of the Preliminary Investigation Stage. PhD (Law) diss.]. Ufa, 218 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/amepfl
- Khomitskaya T.P. (2014). Kommentarii k Postanovleniyu ot 28.06.2012 № 16 «O praktike primeneniya sudami osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel'stva ugolovnykh del pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve» [Commentary on Resolution no. 16 of June 28, 2012 “On the practice of application by courts of a special procedure for the trial of criminal cases when concluding a pre-trial cooperation agreement”]. In: Lebedev V.M. (ed.). Kommentarii k postanovleniyam Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii po ugolovnym delam [Commentary on the Decisions of the Plenum of Supreme Court of Russian Federation on Criminal Cases]. Moscow, NORMA Publ., 816 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
