Issues of improving the legal regulation of the institute of petitions in Russian criminal proceedings
- Authors: PERETYATKO N.M.1, FEDYUNIN A.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State Law Academy
- Issue: Vol 7, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 338-347
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/303495
- ID: 303495
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The study relevance is due to the presence of a number of legal institute of petitions problems in criminal proceedings in Russia, which have accumulated in recent years and require the measures development for their prompt resolution. The purpose of the work is to study the petitions institution in the criminal process of Russia, to identify trends in its development and accumulated legal contradictions that impede the participants rights realization in the process, as well as to develop proposals and recommendations for solving the problems found. The work used classical methods of legal study: analysis, synthesis, generalization of law enforcement practice, logic. Based on the legislation analysis, decisions of higher courts and law enforcement practice, it was concluded that it is necessary to take measures to reform the legal regulation of the petitions institute, primarily related to the rights realization and legitimate interests of participants in the criminal process. The conclusion is substantiated that an effective model of interaction between the person conducting the investigation and the persons participating in the criminal case presupposes the legislative consolidation of the right to file petitions in articles directly devoted to their procedural status. The reforming necessity the petitions institute and establishing minimum requirements for their structure and content, as well as fixing the obligation of the person who accepted the criminal case for his proceedings to resolve the petition by issuing a reasoned decision and notifying the applicant about the decision taken by the law within the time period established by law is proved.
About the authors
Natalya M. PERETYATKO
Saratov State Law Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: naperetyatko@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4156-4430
PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Criminal Procedure Department
Russian Federation, 1 Volskaya St., Saratov, 410056, Russian FederationAnton E. FEDYUNIN
Saratov State Law Academy
Email: aef@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1866-8629
Dr. habil. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of Criminal Procedure Department
Russian Federation, 1 Volskaya St., Saratov, 410056, Russian FederationReferences
- Mezhentseva A.Ya. (1982). Khodataistva v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Petitions in Soviet Criminal Proceedings]. Voprosy bor’by s prestupnost’yu [Questions of the Fight against Crime]. Moscow, Legal Literature Publ., no. 37, pp. 57-66. (In Russ.) Available at: http://lawlibrary.ru/article1091601.html
- Stetsovskii Yu.I. (1982). Ugolovno-protsessual’naya deyatel’nost’ zashchitnika [Criminal Procedural Activity of the Defense Lawyer]. Moscow, Legal Literature Publ., 174 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://lawlibrary.ru/izdanie3032.html
- Aliev T.T., Gromov N.A., Makarov L.V. (2002). Ugolovno-protsessual’noe dokazyvanie: Uchastie obvinyaemogo i zashchitnika. Sobiranie, proverka i otsenka dokazatel’stv. Khodataistva i zhaloby [Criminal Procedural Evidence: Participation of the Accused and the Defense Counsel. Collecting, checking and Evaluating Evidence. Petitions and Complaints]. Moscow, Kniga-servis Publ., 128 p. (In Russ.)
- Grigor’ev V.N., Michurina O.V., Bobrov V.K. (et al.). (2002). Ugolovnyi protsess. Vyp. 2 [Criminal Procedure. Vol. 2]. Moscow, IMTs GUK MVD Rossii Publ., 376 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rzxeff
- Golovko L.V. (ed.). (2017). Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa [Course of Criminal Procedure]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 1278 p. (In Russ.)
- Luginets E.F. (2018). “Procedural freedom” in realization of legal institute of petitions and complaints in criminal proceedings. Yurist”-Pravoved” [Lawyer-Legislator], no. 1 (84), pp. 22-26. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xnzelz
- Baigonchokova N.A. (2014). Nekotorye aspekty zayavleniya khodataistv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki i Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Some aspects of filing petitions in criminal proceedings of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Volgogradskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Journal of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia, no. 2 (29), pp. 70-75. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/snefvd
- Kapinus N.I. (2007). Right for application in criminal procedure. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, no. 6, pp. 74-79. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kvvxsv
- Morozova L.A. (2010). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of Government and Law]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 510 p. (In Russ.)
- Maksimov O.A. (2019). Status of a participant in a criminal case as a condition for the enforcement of the right to petition and claim. Simbirskii nauchnyi vestnik = Simbirsk Scientific Journal Vestnik, no. 2 (36), pp. 70-74. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/inyvqe
- Kokoreva L.V. (2019). Perechen’ lits, imeyushchikh pravo zayavit’ khodataistvo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve, nuzhdaetsya v utochnenii [The list of persons entitled to file a petition in criminal proceedings needs to be clarified]. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii v ramkakh 4 Mezhdunarodnogo Festivalya nauki «Nauka i novatsiya: sovremennye problemy teorii i praktiki prava» [Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference within the Framework of the 4th International Science Festival “Science and Innovation: Modern Problems of Theory and Practice of Law”]. Moscow, Moscow Region State University Publ., pp. 111-113. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yupozd
Supplementary files
