Structure of secondary law
- Authors: KRAMSKOY V.V.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Tambov State Technical University
- Tambov Branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Issue: Vol 7, No 4 (2023)
- Pages: 493-503
- Section: General Theory and History of Law and the State
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/303621
- ID: 303621
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The internal structure of secondary law is considered as a universal theoretical and legal construct, used not only in private law areas, but also in public law. At the same time, the prevailing civilistic approach to the study of secondary rights in science is stated, which does not provide a fully objective picture of the essence of this legal structure. Based on the patterns of subjective law structure, based on theory of law works, we analyzed the content of the powers included in the secondary law, through which the interest inherent in the secondary law is realized. According to observations, only two powers can form the construction of a secondary law –the power to one’s own behavior and the power to someone else’s behavior (the authority to demand). At the same time, for secondary law development, in some cases, only one power is sufficient – the power to one’s own behavior, in others, it is possible for the initially two named powers to coexist within the framework of one construction of secondary law, or the power to someone else’s behavior can have an auxiliary property for the purposes of exercising the right to one’s own behavior. In addition, theoretical calculations are given regarding the dependence of the set of powers in the structure of secondary law on the type of legal relationship (regulatory, protective, industrial) and the properties of stability and dynamism of the structure of secondary law in the conditions of modern legal reality are studied. Based on the results of the study, conclusions are formulated.
About the authors
Vadim V. KRAMSKOY
Tambov State Technical University; Tambov Branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Author for correspondence.
Email: vkramskoy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4186-7765
PhD (Law), Associate Professor of Civil Law and Process Department of Law Institute; Associate Professor of Legal Disciplines Department
Russian Federation, 106/5 Sovetskaya St., Tambov, 392000, Russian Federation; 14a Morshanskoe Rte., Tambov, 392008, Russian FederationReferences
- Vorms A.E. (1914). Veksel’nye blanki [Bill Forms]. Moscow, Typo-Lithography of the Partnership I.N. Kushnerev and Ko, 30 p. (In Russ.)
- Ioffe O.S. (2000). Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu: iz istorii tsivilisticheskoi mysli. Grazhdanskoe pravootnoshenie. Kritika teorii «khozyaistvennogo prava» [Selected Works on Civil Law: From the History of Civil Thought. Civil Legal Relations. Criticism of the Theory of “Economic Law”]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 777 p. (In Russ.)
- Agarkov M.M. (2002). Obyazatel’stvo po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Obligation under Soviet civil law]. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu [Selected Works on Civil Law]. Moscow, vol. 1, 490 p. (In Russ.)
- Tret’yakov S.V. (2022). Razvitie ucheniya o sub"ektivnom chastnom prave v zarubezhnoi tsivilistike: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Development of the Doctrine of Subjective Private Law in Foreign Civil Law. Dr. habil. (Law) diss.]. Moscow, 495 p. (In Russ.)
- Tuhr A. Von. (2007). Tratado de las Obligaciones. Granada, Editorial Comares, 543 p. (In Sp.)
- Babaev A.B. (2006). Problema sekundarnykh prav v rossiiskoi tsivilistike: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The Problem of Secondary Rights in Russian Civil Law. PhD (Law) diss. abstr.]. Moscow, 24 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nkcjnr
- Karnushin V.E. (2016). Sekundranye prava v grazhdanskom prave Rossiiskoi Federatsii: obshchie voprosy teorii, sekundarnye prava v Grazhdanskom kodekse RF [Secondary Rights in the Civil Law of the Russian Federation: General Issues of Theory, Secondary Rights in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 256 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wgagnn
- Belov V.A. (gen. ed.). (2007). Grazhdanskoe pravo: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki [Civil Law: Current Problems of Theory and Practice]. Moscow, Urait Publ., 993 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxgknl
- Portmann W. (1996). Wesen und System der subjektiven Privatrechte. Zürich, Schulthess Publ., 277 S. (In Ger.)
- Bratus’ S.N. (1976). Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ i zakonnost’. Ocherk teorii [Legal Responsibility and Legality. Outline of the Theory]. Moscow, 215 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rahztl
- Aleksandrov N.G. (1955). Zakonnost’ i pravootnosheniya v sovetskom obshchestve [Legality and Legal Relations in Soviet Society]. Moscow, 176 p. (In Russ.)
- Matuzov N.I., Mal’ko A.V. (2000). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of Government and Rights]. Moscow, 720 p. (In Russ.)
- Pevzner A.G. (1961). Ponyatie i vidy sub”ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The Concept and Types of Subjective Civil Rights. PhD (Law) diss.]. Moscow, 242 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/npquzz
- Gruzdev V.V. (2018). The structure of subjective civil rights and civil obligations. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, no. 5 (90), pp. 95-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.90.5.095-104, https://elibrary.ru/xsmfsh
- Pigolkin A.S., Dmitriev Yu.A. (eds.). (2008). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow, 743 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vtsbzf
Supplementary files
