Email this article The main aspects characterizing the crime disclosure concept
- Authors: POTAPOV S.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Derzhavin Tambov State University
- Issue: Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 86-92
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/303717
- ID: 303717
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The relevance is due to a comprehensive study of the meanings of the criminal procedural, forensic and operational-investigative concepts of crime disclosure. The purpose of work is to analyze the above concepts and establish their significance for solving the problems of criminal justice. Realization of the goal is achieved by using the laws of dialectics, formal logic and the use of general scientific and private scientific research methods. We explore the genesis of the origin of these concepts, their characteristic features, relationship of concepts both among themselves and with the concept of crime investigation. We define and study the criminal procedural concept of the crime disclosure in relation to the concept of its investigation. We conclude that in this case the contents of these concepts coincide, and the concept of crime disclosure loses its scientific significance. The forensic concept of crime disclosure is of great scientific, methodological and practical importance for the crimes investigation. We consider it as the initial stage of the investigation, without which it is impossible to achieve its ultimate goal. We study the operational-investigative concept of crime disclosure, which is legally fixed as one of the main tasks of Operational-Investigative Activity. We study the main features of crime disclosure concept, ways to increase its effectiveness are identified. We conclude that the crime disclosure concept is a forensic and operational-investigative category that has great scientific, methodological and practical significance for solving the problems of criminal proceedings.
About the authors
Sergey A. POTAPOV
Derzhavin Tambov State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: potapov.1995@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4364-7694
Candidate of Law, Associate Professor of Criminal Law and Procedure Department of Law and National Security Institute
Russian Federation, 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian FederationReferences
- Vandyshev V.A., Robozerov V.Y. Raskrytiye prestupleniy, sovershennykh v usloviyakh neochevidnosti [Disclo-sure of Crimes Committed in Conditions of Non-Obviousness]. Leningrad, 1990, 140 p. (In Russian).
- Zhogin N.V., Fatkullin F.N. Predvaritel’noye sledstviye v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Preliminary Investi-gation in the Soviet Criminal Process]. Moscow, 1985, 367 p. (In Russian).
- Gerasimov I.F. Nekotoryye problemy raskrytiya prestupleniy [Some Problems of Solving Crimes]. Sverdlovsk, Central Ural Publishing House, 1975, 183 p. (In Russian).
- Gavrilov A.K. Raskrytiye prestupleniy na predvaritel’nom sledstvii (pravovyye i organizatsionnyye voprosy) [Disclosure of Crimes During the Preliminary Investigation (Legal and Organizational Issues)]. Volgograd, 1976, 207 p. (In Russian).
- Rozentsvayg V.E. K voprosu o ponyatii raskrytogo prestupleniya [On the question of the concept of a solved crime]. Sbornik nauchnykh rabot Kazakhskogo NIISE. Vyp. 2 [Collection of Scientific Works of the Kazakh Re-search Institute of Forensic Examinations. Issue 2]. Alma-Ata, 1971, 277 p. (In Russian).
- Ostroumov S., Panchenko S. Kriterii otsenki raskrytiya prestupleniy [Criteria for evaluating crime disclosure]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost’ [Socialist Legitimacy], 1976, no. 9, pp. 51-52. (In Russian).
- Dyablova Y.L. Nekotoryye aspekty sootnosheniya raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy [Some aspects of the correlation between disclosure and investigation of crimes]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosuniversiteta – Izvestiya Tula State University, 2009, no. 1, pp. 363. (In Russian).
- Larin A.M. Rabota sledovatelya s dokazatel’stvami [Investigator’s work with Evidence]. Moscow, Yuridi-cheskaya Literatura Publ., 1966, 155 p. (In Russian).
- Obraztsov V.A. Kriminalisticheskaya klassifikatsiya prestupleniy [Forensic Classification of Crimes]. Kras-noyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State University Publ., 1988, 176 p. (In Russian).
- Belkin R.S. Kurs kriminalistiki: v 3 t. [Forensic Course: in 3 vols.]. Moscow, 1997, vol. 3, 537 p. (In Russian).
- Marfitsin P.G., Tomin V.T., Zinchenko I.A. Ugolovnyy protsess. Problemnyye lektsii [Criminal Process. Problem Lectures]. Moscow, Urait Publ., 2015, 799 p. (In Russian).
- Potapov S.A. Znacheniye neotlozhnykh sledstvennykh deystviy v raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy [The im-portance of urgent investigative actions in the disclosure and investigation of crimes]. Materialy 5 Mezhduna-rodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2 t. «Tambovskiye pravovyye chteniya imeni F.N. Plevako» [Pro-ceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practice Conference: in 2 vols. “Tambov Legal Readings named for F.N. Plevako”]. Tambov, Publishing House “Derzhavinsky”, 2021, vol. 1, 376 p. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
