Email this article The institution of criminal case termination as an object of legal regulation in the system of criminal procedure legislation
- Authors: PERETYATKO N.M.1, FEDYUNIN A.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State Law Academy
- Issue: Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 93-102
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/303719
- ID: 303719
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The relevance of work is due to the presence of legal problems of the institution of criminal case termination, which have accumulated in recent years and the need to develop measures for the legal regulation of this sphere of legal relations. The purpose of work is to study the institute of criminal case termination as an object of legal regulation. The objectives of the study are to identify trends in the development of the institution of criminal case termination, emerging legal contradictions, respect for the rights of participants in the process, as well as developing proposals and recommendations for solving existing problems. We use classical methods of legal research: analysis, synthesis, generalization of law enforcement practice, logic. Based on the analysis of legislation, decisions of higher courts and law enforcement practice, a conclusion is made about the emerging trends in the field of reforming the institution of criminal case termination, primarily related to the realization of the right of persons to rehabilitation. We substantiate the conclusion that the power to terminate the criminal case in the sense of understanding it as a final decision should be entrusted to the court, since in its essence this is its resolution on the merits. We prove the need to reform the institution of criminal case termination, however, the legislator should focus on correcting its contradictions, inaccuracies and existing gaps in order to bring it into line with the norms enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the principles proclaimed by it and the purpose of criminal proceedings.
About the authors
Natalya M. PERETYATKO
Saratov State Law Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: naperetyatko@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4156-4430
Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Criminal Process Department
Russian Federation, 1 Volskaya St., Saratov 410056, Russian FederationAnton E. FEDYUNIN
Saratov State Law Academy
Email: aef@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1866-8629
Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Professor of Criminal Process Department
Russian Federation, 1 Volskaya St., Saratov 410056, Russian FederationReferences
- Doroshkov V.V. Sovremennyy ugolovnyy protsess cherez prizmu dukhovno-nravstvennykh osnov rossiyskogo obshchestva [Modern criminal procedure through from the perspective of spiritual and moral grounds of Russian society]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 14-25. doi: 10.12737/jrl.2021.144. (In Russian).
- Lavnov M.A. Formy deyatel’nosti prokurora pri realizatsii norm instituta prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) [Forms of prosecutor’s work in ruling of criminal case termination (criminal pros-ecution)]. Pravo: istoriya i sovremennost’ – Law: History and Modernity, 2020, no. 4 (13), pp. 88-96. doi: 10.17277/pravo.2020.04.pp.088-096. (In Russian).
- Akutayev R.M., Yusupov M.Y. Sudebnyy shtraf kak al’ternativa ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti (ugolovnomu pres-ledovaniyu): komparativistskiy aspekt [A judicial penalty as an alternative to criminal responsibility (criminal prosecution): comparative aspect]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya – Russian Justitia, 2018, no. 1, pp. 25-30. (In Russian).
- Makarova O. V. Pravovoye regulirovaniye instituta reabilitatsii v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Legal regu-lation of the institute of rehabilitation in the russian criminal procedure]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 5, pp. 30-36. doi: 10.12737/3459. (In Russian).
- Vereshchagina A.V. Opredeleniye razmera kompensatsii moral’nogo vreda za nezakonnoye ugolovnoye presle-dovaniye [Evaluation of compensation for moral damage caused by unlawful criminal prosecution]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 11, pp. 151-159. doi: 10.12737/14382. (In Russian).
- Endoltseva A.V. K voprosu o razgranichenii osnovaniy prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela ili ugolovnogo presle-dovaniya s uchetom ikh yuridicheskoy prirody i pravovykh posledstviy [On the issue of distinguishing the grounds for termination of a criminal case or criminal prosecution taking into account their legal nature and legal consequences]. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti – Vestnik of Academy of economic security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2021, no. 2, pp. 134-141. doi: 10.24412/2414-3995-2021-2-134-141. (In Russian).
- Fedyunin A.E., Peretyatko N.M. Kul’tura normotvorchestva v oblasti zakonodatel’nogo regulirovaniya instituta reabilitatsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve kak garantiya obespecheniya prav i zakonnykh interesov uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa [Lawmaking culture in the field of legislative regulation of rehabilitation institution in criminal proceeding as the way to provide the rights and lawful interests of criminal procedure’s participants]. Pravovaya kul’tura – The Legal Culture, 2020, no. 4 (43), pp. 70-81. (In Russian).
- Fedyunin A.E., Peretyatko N.M. Kontseptual’nyye problemy instituta reabilitatsii v ugolovnom protsesse [Con-ceptual problems of the rehabilitation institute in criminal proceedings]. Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstva i pra-va – Current Issues of the State and Law, 2020, vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 278-286. doi: 10.20310/2587-9340-2020-4-14-278-286. (In Russian).
- Gessen I.V. Sudebnaya reforma [Judicial Reform]. St. Petersburg, Knigoizdatelstvo P.P. Gershchnina Publ., Ty-po-lithography by F. Vaysberga i P. Gershchnina, 1905, 267 p. (In Russian).
- Pudovochkin Y.E. Obshchiye problemy i oshibki osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti (obzor su-debnoy praktiki) [General problems and errors of exemption from criminal liability (review of judicial practice)]. Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii – Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation, 2020, no. 1 (75), pp. 85-92. (In Russian).
- Bytko Y.I. Institutu osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti net mesta v zakonodatel’stve [Institute of absolute discharge has no place in legislation]. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii – Saratovbstate Law Academy Bulletin, 2017, no. 5 (118), pp. 182-189. (In Russian).
- Vdovtsev P.V. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva pri prekrashchenii ugolovnogo dela po nereabilitiruyushchim osno-vaniyam [Seizure of property in termination of a criminal case for reasons other than exoneration]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel’ – Russian Investigator, 2021, no. 9, pp. 34-37. doi: 10.18572/1812-3783-2021-9-34-37. (In Rus-sian).
- Ryabinina T.K. Spornyye voprosy prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela ili ugolovnogo presledovaniya na predvari-tel’nom slushanii vvidu otkaza prokurora ot obvineniya [Disputable issues of termination of a criminal case or criminal prosecution at a pre-trial hearing on account of charges dropped by a public prosecutor]. Zakonnost’ [Legality], 2017, no. 12, pp. 41-45. (In Russian).
- Timanovskiy A.T. Sbornik tolkovaniy russkikh yuristov k Sudebnym ustavam imperatora Aleksandra Vtorogo: Za 25 let (1866–1891): Uchrezhdeniye sudebnykh ustanovleniy i Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Collec-tion of Interpretations of Russian Lawyers to the Judicial Charters of Emperor Alexander 2nd: For 25 years (1866–1891): Establishment of Judicial Regulations and the Charter of Criminal Procedure]. Varshava, 1892, 658 p. (In Russian).
- Pudovochkin Y.E., Tolkachenko A.A. Osnovnyye napravleniya mezhotraslevogo sovershenstvovaniya instituta osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [The main directions of intersectoral improvement institute of exemption from criminal liability]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 4, pp. 59-76. doi: 10.12737/jrl.2020.042. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
