Termination of criminal prosecution and termination of a criminal case: current state of law enforcement
- Authors: ENDOLTSEVA Y.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Institute of the Ministry of Interior of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 6, No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 619-628
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/303905
- ID: 303905
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The release of a person from criminal liability by terminating his criminal prosecution is an alternative form of resolving a criminal law conflict, tested by Russian and foreign practice. In order to understand how effective this practice is in Russia, what is the current state of law enforcement in this aspect, we study scientific works, decisions and rulings of the highest courts of Russia, analyze the statistical data presented on the official websites of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation and the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court Russian Federation. The accomplished work allows us to conclude, including that the modern model of regulation of the institution of termination of criminal prosecution and termination of criminal case is imperfect, the legislator is in search of optimal ways to simplify and speed up criminal proceedings, but with a proper balance of private and public interests. The ratio of the number of terminated criminal cases between the bodies of preliminary investigation and the courts indicates the uneven application of the indicated legal institutions in pre-trial and judicial proceedings, the need for a systematic determination of the causes and conditions affecting these facts, both from the point of view of criminal law and criminal procedure, and criminological aspects, with the identification of their relationship and interpenetration, which would make it possible to establish and consolidate such an approach to determining the effectiveness of law enforcement in the designated issue, which would fully meet the state goals and objectives in the field of criminal policy and would become the foundation for building an optimal model of legal regulation of institutions exemption from criminal liability, termination of criminal prosecution, termination of criminal case.
About the authors
Yulia V. ENDOLTSEVA
National Research Institute of the Ministry of Interior of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: sivelllinn@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7501-9468
Candidate of Law, Doctoral Candidate of Center for Organizational Support of Research Activities
Russian Federation, 1 Bldg 25 Povarskaya St., Moscow 121069, Russian FederationReferences
- Golovko L.V. Al’ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu kak forma protsessual’noy differentsiatsii: sovremennyye tendentsii razvitiya: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Alternatives to Criminal Prosecution as a form of Procedural Differentiation: Current Development Trends. Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2003, 463 p. (In Russian).
- Endoltseva A.V. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: teoreticheskiye, zakonodatel’nyye i pravoprimenitel’noy problemy: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Institute of Exemption from Criminal Liability: Theoretical, Legislative and Law Enforcement Problems. Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2005, 396 p. (In Russian).
- Volynskaya O.V. Prekrashcheniye ugolovnogo dela i ugolovnogo presledovaniya: teoreticheskiye i organizatsionno-pravovyye problemy: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Termination of a Criminal Case and Criminal Prosecution: Theoretical, Organizational and Legal Problems. Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2007, 462 p. (In Russian).
- Sverchkov V.V. Kontseptual’nyye osnovy resheniya problem osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Conceptual Framework for Solving the Problems of Exemption from Criminal Liability. Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2008, 396 p. (In Russian).
- Antonov A.G. Spetsial’nyye osnovaniya osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Special Grounds for Exemption from Criminal Liability. Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Tomsk, 2013, 381 p. (In Russian).
- Foyyer M.V. Pravovaya priroda instituta osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [The legal nature of the institution of exemption from criminal liability]. Ius Publicum et Privatum, 2021, no. 4 (14), pp. 93-98. (In Russian).
- Khatenevich T.G. Kriterii klassifikatsii vidov osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya [Criteria for classification of types of release from criminal liability and punishment]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D. Ekonomicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki – Herald of Polotsk State University. Series D. Economics and Law Sciences, 2019, no. 14, pp. 166-171. (In Russian).
- Kolesnikova L.G. Klassifikatsiya osnovaniy prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela i ugolovnogo presledovaniya [Classification of grounds for terminating a criminal case and criminal prosecution]. Materialy Vserossiyskogo nauchno-prakticheskogo simpoziuma «Aktual’nyye problemy sudebnoy, pravookhranitel’noy, pravozashchitnoy, ugolovno-protsessual’noy deyatel’nosti i natsional’noy bezopasnosti» [Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Symposium “Current Issues of Judicial, Law Enforcement, Human Rights, Criminal Procedure and National Security”]. Krasnodar, 2019, pp. 57-61. (In Russian).
- Dvoretskiy M.Y., Stromov V.Y. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’: realizatsiya i effektivnost’: v 4 ch. Ch. 2. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’: istoriya zakonodatel’nogo zakrepleniya, ponyatiye, sushchnost’, vidy, osnovaniye, realizatsiya v mekhanizme otechestvennogo ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya i eye effektivnost’ [Criminal Liability: Implementation and Effectiveness: in 4 pts. Pt 2. Criminal Liability: History of Legislative Consolidation, Concept, Essence, Types, Basis, Implementation in the Mechanism of Domestic Criminal Law Regulation and Its Effectiveness]. Tambov, 2013, pp. 277-310. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
