Problematic approaches to the concept and essence of falsification of evidence in the arbitration process

The problem of examining evidence in the arbitration process is considered, in particular, the process of examining and evaluating evidence, including for their reliability and lack of falsification, in cases where a relevant request is received from a person participating in the case. The purpose is to analyze scientific approaches to the concept and essence of falsification of evidence in the arbitration process. Tasks - to explore the conceptual apparatus to reflect the essence of the arbitration process, the state of the arbitration procedural legislation and the views formed within the framework of legal science. On the basis of scientific analysis, theoretical conclusions on the falsification of evidence as a legal institution are proposed, a comparison is made with other concepts, such as, for example, the recognition of evidence as unreliable. The actions of the judge in the case of a statement by a person participating in the case, statements about the falsification of evidence, as well as the consequences of such a statement, are studied in detail. Theoretical conclusions are based on the jurisprudence of the Arbitration Court of the Tambov Region on the issue of considering applications for falsification of evidence, as well as the jurisprudence of higher courts on checking the compliance of judicial acts issued by the court of first instance based on the results of consideration of these applications, the norms of substantive and procedural law. Of particular interest are the author's recommendations on the formation of a unified algorithm for considering these applications and identifying typical shortcomings made when resolving these applications.