Email this article GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A BAILIFF’S LEGAL STATUS IN THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (COMPARATIVE LEGAL ASPECT)
- Authors: Goltsman E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
- Issue: Vol 4, No 16 (2020)
- Pages: 426-434
- Section: General Theory and History of Law and the State
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/304067
- ID: 304067
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Based on the methodology of chrono-discrete monogeographic comparative law, we identify the comparative potential of bailiffs’ legal status in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. Until recently, the legislation of the Russian Federation did not give a clear idea of bailiffs’ legal position in the civil service. We believe that, speaking about a bailiff’s legal status and comparing the regulatory framework that regulates it, it is necessary to determine what elements constitute a bailiff’s legal status; to compare comparable, conditionally comparable and incomparable elements of this status. At present, this issue is more definite and developed in comparison with the pre-revolutionary period. Comparison of specific elements of legal status in different historical periods may lead to the development of practical recommendations for improving the current legislation governing the structure and activities of the institution of bailiffs. We designate six elements of bailiffs’ legal status, which are fundamentally comparable in relation to the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. We also note the need to take into account the specific historical situation in the studied periods, the specifics of the political, economic, and social structure, and the peculiarities of legal awareness and mentality.
About the authors
Elena Valerievna Goltsman
Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: ev12345@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1293-7373
Lecturer of Management Department
Russian Federation, 3 Ankudinovskoe Hwy., Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russian FederationReferences
- Demichev A.A. Khronodiskretnoye monogeograficheskoye sravnitel’noye pra-vovedeniye kak napravleniye sovremennoy yuridicheskoy nauki [Chronodiscrete monogeographic comparative jurisprudence as a direction of modern legal science]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava – History of State and Law, 2010, no. 16, pp. 2-7. (In Russian).
- Bolshakova V.M. Prokuratura kak khronodiskretnyy rossiyskiy institut [The public prosecutor’s office as a chrono-discrete Russian institution]. Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava – Matters of Russian and International Law, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6A, pp. 12-18. (In Russian).
- Cherepanov S.I. Institut prisyazhnykh poverennykh v Rossiyskoy imperii po sudebnoy reforme 1864 goda i institut advokatury v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (khronodiskretnoye issledovaniye) [Institute of Attorneys at Law in the Russian Empire on Judicial Reform of 1864 and the Institute of the Bar in the Russian Federation (Chrono-Discrete Research)]. Moscow, Urlitinform Publ., 2020, 160 p. (In Russian).
- Ilyukhina V.A., Volosatykh E.A. Garantii realizatsii prav i obyazannostey mirovykh sudey v Rossiyskoy imperii i Rossiyskoy Federatsii (khronodiskretnyy analiz) [Guarantees of exercising of rights and obligations of justices of the peace in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (a chrono-discrete analysis)]. Mirovoy sud’ya – Magistrate Judge, 2019, no. 7, pp. 16-21. (In Russian).
- Ilyukhin A.V. Protsess stanovleniya suda prisyazhnykh v Rossii s pozitsii metodologii khronodiskretnogo monogeograficheskogo sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya [The process of formation of the jury in Russia from the standpoint of the methodology of chrono-discrete monogeographic comparative jurisprudence]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Pervoy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Aktual’nyye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya nauchnoy shkoly Khronodiskretnogo monogeograficheskogo sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya» [Collection of Scientific Works based on the Materials of the First All-Russian Scientific Conference “Current Issues and Development Prospects of the Scientific School of Chrono-Discrete Monogeographic Comparative Jurisprudence”]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA Publ., 2018, pp. 95-107. (In Russian).
- Kraynova E.R. Khronodiskretnoye obshchepravovoye issledovaniye instituta apellyatsii v Rossiyskoy imperii i Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Chronodiscrete General Legal Study of the Institution of Appeal in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Vladimir, 2016, 197 p. (In Russian).
- Leonov A.P. Gosudarstvennaya Duma v Rossii kak khronodiskretnyy institut [The State Duma in Russia as chrono-discrete institute]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii – Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2017, no. 1 (37), pp. 126-130. (In Russian).
- Demichev K.A. Chastnopravovyye issledovaniya v kontekste metodologicheskikh osnov nauchnoy shkoly KHMSP [Private law research in the context of the methodological foundations of the scientific school of chrono-discrete monogeography comparative law]. Uchenyye zapiski [Scientists Notes]. Vol. 16. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA Publ., 2018, pp. 38-44. (In Russian).
- Demichev A.A. Puti formirovaniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Ways of civil society establishment in Russia: history and the modern times]. Grazhdanskoye obshchestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom – Civil Society in Russia and Abroad, 2018, no. 2, pp. 22-26. (In Russian).
- Demichev K.A. Ideya i kontseptsiya kak ob”yekt izucheniya khronodiskretnogo monogeograficheskogo sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya [Idea and conception as object of studying of chrono-discrete mono-geography comparative jurisprudence]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy – Russian Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, no. 3, pp. 13-15. (In Russian).
- Ilyukhina V.A. Printsipy prava kak predmet khronodiskretnogo monogeografi-cheskogo sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya [Principles of law as a subject of chrono-discrete monogeographic comparative law]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Vtoroy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Aktual’nyye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya nauchnoy shkoly Khronodiskretnogo monogeograficheskogo sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya» [Collection of Scientific Works based on the Materials of the Second All-Russian Scientific Conference “Current Issues and Development Prospects of the Scientific School of Chrono-Discrete Monogeographic Comparative Jurisprudence”]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA Publ., 2019, pp. 39-47. (In Russian).
- Demichev A.A. Problemy izucheniya pravovoy preyemstvennosti v khronodiskretnykh monogeograficheskikh issledovaniyakh [Problems of studying legal continuity in chrono-discrete monogeographic studies]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika – Juridical Techniques, 2011, no. 5, pp. 160-165. (In Russian).
- Goltsman E.V. Normativno-pravovaya osnova funktsionirovaniya instituta sudebnykh pristavov v Rossiyskoy imperii i Rossiyskoy Federatsii (khronodiskretnyy analiz) [Legal and regulatory framework for the functioning of the institution of bailiffs in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (chrono-discrete analysis)]. Istoriko-pravovyye problemy: Novyy rakurs – Historical-Legal Problems: The New Viewpoint, 2019, no. 3, pp. 95-107. (In Russian).
- Bolshakova V.M. Rossiyskiye khronodiskretnyye sudebnyye instituty [Russian Chrono-Discrete Judicial Institutions]. Moscow, RuScience Publ., 2019, 180 p. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
