LEGAL REGULATION EFFECTIVENESS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY OF CIVIL SERVANTS
- Authors: Varnavskiy A.P.1
-
Affiliations:
- Derzhavin Tambov State University
- Issue: Vol 4, No 16 (2020)
- Pages: 455-462
- Section: General Theory and History of Law and the State
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/304070
- ID: 304070
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Currently, the problem of differentiating administrative and disciplinary liability, as well as the problem of bringing civil servants to justice, is considered quite relevant. The purpose of this work is to find possible solutions to the above problems. The research involves the following methods of scientific knowledge: concrete-sociological, statistical, formal-logical and comparative-legal methods. We form the opinion that the list of types of administrative liability applied to civil servants is open and controversial. We identify mandatory and additional signs of an administrative offense and distinguish between an administrative offense and a disciplinary offense. We establish that the mandatory basis for applying measures of administrative liability of a civil servant is the implementation of an administrative tort due to inaction or inaction in the exercise of such professional duties in the service. We also conclude that civil servants should be brought to disciplinary liability for violations related to their official activities, and to administrative liability – on an equal basis with citizens on a general basis. In addition, the institution of administrative liability needs legislative revision and more intensive study in practice.
About the authors
Aleksey Pavlovich Varnavskiy
Derzhavin Tambov State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: campos-daniel@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8888-0043
Master’s Degree Student of Law and National Security Institute
Russian Federation, 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian FederationReferences
- Radko T.N. Sluzhebnoye pravo [Service Law]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2007, 341 p. (In Russian).
- Kurakin A.V. Mezhdunarodnyye i zarubezhnyye standarty administrativno-pravovykh sredstv preduprezhdeniya i presecheniya korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby [International and Foreign Standards of Administrative and Legal Means of Preventing and Suppressing Corruption in the Civil Service System]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2009, 233 p. (In Russian).
- Chernogor N.N. Problemy otvetstvennosti v teorii munitsipal’nogo prava i praktike mestnogo samoupravleniya [Problems of Responsibility in the Theory of Municipal Law and Practice of Local Self-Government]. Moscow, Vektor Publ., 2011, 382 p. (In Russian).
- Nozdrachev A.F. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Civil Service]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2009, 499 p. (In Russian).
- Kozbanenko V.A. Teoriya funktsiy prava [Theory of Legal Functions]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2014, 243 p. (In Russian).
- Nozdrachev A.F. Munitsipal’naya sluzhba [Municipal Service]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 1999, 344 p. (In Russian).
- Starilov Y.N. Sluzhebnoye pravo [Service Law]. Moscow, Blue Bird Publ., 2003, 341 p. (In Russian).
- Grazhdan V.D. Gosudarstvennaya grazhdanskaya sluzhba [State Civil Service]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2009, 490 p. (In Russian).
- Varnavskiy A.P. Nekotoryye voprosy normativno-pravovoy reglamentatsii pravovogo statusa gosudarstvennogo sluzhashchego [Some issues of legal regulation of the legal status of a civil servant]. Materialy 4 Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Tambovskiye pravovyye chteniya im. F.N. Plevako» [Proceedings of the 4 International Research and Practice Conference “Tambov Legal Readings named after F.N. Plevako”]. Tambov, Publishing House “Derzhavinsky”, 2020, vol. 2, pp. 131-135. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
