State coercion and its implementation in administrative proceedings

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

We investigate the state coercion legal nature, the implementation problems of the latter in administrative proceedings. We illustrate the positions of legal scholars regarding the views on the actual basis of the use of state coercion measures. It is emphasized that the recognition of an offense as the only factual basis for the application of state coercion measures will be valid only in the case of the application of legal liability measures, while prevention and protection measures assume the presence of other legal facts. We analyze the issues of state coercion in the light of their normative consolidation in the Code of administrative procedure of the Russian Federation. Also we investigate characteristic features of coercion in administrative proceedings. We point out on the coercion specificity in the sphere of administrative proceedings as a form of law enforcement activity, the implementation of which is entrusted to the judiciary. The problem of more precise systematization of state coercion measures in administrative proceedings is raised. We consider the actual basis issues for the coercive measures use from different positions. The necessity of studying the measures of legal coercion is determined. In addition, it is indicated that the implementation of administrative procedural coercion measures in administrative proceedings is aimed primarily at restoring the violated procedural order and is restorative in nature.

About the authors

Tatyana Ivanovna Akimova

Derzhavin Tambov State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: akimovati.tmb@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9324-1270

Candidate of JurisprudenceAssociate Professor of Civil and Arbitration Process Department of Law and National Security Institute

Russian Federation, 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Farukshin M.K. Voprosy obshchey teorii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [Issues of the general theory of legal responsibility]. Pravovedeniye [Legal Science], 1969, no. 4, pp. 16-35. (In Russian).
  2. Leyst O.E. Sanktsii v sovetskom prave [Sanctions in Soviet Law]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1962, 238 p. (In Russian).
  3. Vengerov A.B. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow, Omega-L Publ., 2002, 608 p. (In Russian).
  4. Egorov V.S. Obshcheye ponyatiye pravovogo prinuzhdeniya [Legal coercion general concept]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta [Perm University Herald], 2007, no. 8 (13), pp. 29-35. (In Russian).
  5. Makareyko N.V. Gosudarstvennoye prinuzhdeniye v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve [Government coercion in the administrative proceedings]. Zhurnal administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva [Journal of Administrative Proceedings], 2017, no. 2, pp. 5-10. (In Russian).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Akimova T.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).