Vietnamese domestic policy: economic strategy and the “shift to services”
- Authors: Fforde A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Victoria University
- University of Melbourne
- Issue: Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 29-36
- Section: Scientific researches
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2618-9453/article/view/109178
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.54631/VS.2022.62-109178
- ID: 109178
Cite item
Abstract
The paper discusses recent changes in Vietnamese development strategy: a shift to greater emphasis upon services rather than industry. Given the historical focus of strategy upon the traditional ‘trope’ of factories and an industrial proletariat ‘led by the Party’, this change clearly has significance across many dimensions. The paper explains the policy shift. It then links this strategy, endorsed by the Party, to tensions globally. On the one hand the data shows that developing countries have since the end of the Cold War tended to servicise, not industrialise, with the faster growing countries showing more servicisation (as a share of GDP). On the other, data on research and donor advice shows a continuing and far greater interest in industrialisation. The paper points to published research on Vietnam since 2016 that appears to endorse servicisation. Contrast is made between Vietnam and ‘poster boys’ such as Thailand and Malaysia, praised in the early 1990s as ‘Newly Industrialising Countries’, that now seem to confront relative economic stagnation. Vietnam’s rapid economic growth whilst not implementing the Party’s strategy of ‘Modernisation and Industrialisation’ invites reexamination of the underlying forces driving change in Vietnam.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Adam Fforde
Victoria University; University of Melbourne
Author for correspondence.
Email: adam@aduki.com.au
Adjunct Professor, Victoria Institute of Strategic Economic Studies, Honorary Professorial Fellow
Australia, 70/104, Ballarat Rd, Footscray VIC 3011; MelbourneReferences
- Arrow, K. (1974) The measurement of real value added, in: David, P.A. and Reder, M.W. (ed.) Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press. P 3-19.
- Công nghiệp hóa, hiện đại hóa và yêu cầu đối với giáo dục đại học hiện nay [Industrialisation and modernisation and present requirements for university education]. Nhân Dân, 19.08.2015. URL: www.nhandan.com.vn/giaoduc/dien-dan/item/27199202-cong-nghiep-hoa-hien-dai-hoa-va-yeu-cau-doi-voi-giao-duc-dai-hoc-hien-nay.html
- Ellis, J. (1990) Brute force: Allied strategy and tactics in the Second World War. New York: Viking
- Fforde, A. & Mazyrin, V. (2018) Soviet influence on Vietnamese development policy – some myths, in: Catherine Earl (ed.). Mythbusting Vietnam: Facts, Fictions, Fantasies. Copenhagen: NIAS
- Fforde, A. & Paine, S.H. (1987) The Limits of National Liberation – problems of economic management in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, with a Statistical Appendix. London: Croom-Helm.
- Fforde, A. (2016) Vietnam: economic strategy and economic reality. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35 (2): 3–30.
- Fforde, A. (2018) Yes, but what about services: is development doctrine changing? Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 39 (4): 550–568.
- Fforde, A. (2021) Measuring economic transformation – what to make of constant price sectoral GDP – evidence from Vietnam. Real World Economic Review, Issue 98.
- Fforde, A. (2022, out to review) Lessons for heterodoxy from Vietnam – economic development and the “shift to services’’
- Haraguchi, N., Cheng C., and Smeets E. (2017) The Importance of Manufacturing in Economic Development: Has this Changed? World Development, 93: 293–315.
- Helbe, M. & Shepherd, B. (eds) (2019) Leveraging Services for Development: Prospects and Policies. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Research Institute.
- Hoekman, B. & te Velde, D. W. (2017) Trade in services and economic transformation: a new development policy priority. SET Essay series, February. London: Overseas Development Institute
- Kuznets, S. (1942) Uses of national income in peace and war. Occasional Paper, No. 6, March. New York: NBER.
- Li Yongjian, Xia Jiechang & Lin Yujing (2018). Model and Characteristics of China’s Service Sector Reform during 1978-2016. China Economist, 13 (4): 34–67.
- Nguyen Dinh Chuc & Ta Phuoc Duong (2019). Trade, Structural Adjustments and Productivity Growth in Vietnam – The Shift to Services. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 36 (2): 256–73.
- Nguyễn Quang Thuấn (2021). Những điểm mới về kinh tế trong Văn kiện Đại hội XIII của Đảng [New points regarding the economy in the materials of the 13th Party Congress]. Tạp chí Cộng sản, July 31. URL: https://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/web/guest/kinh-te/-/2018/823738/nhung-diem-moi-ve-kinh-te-trong-van-kien-dai-hoi-xiii-cua-dang.aspx
- Nguyen, HC (2018) Empirical Evidence of Structural Change - The Case of Vietnam’s Economic Growth. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 35 (2): 237–256.
- Prostiakov, I. (1998) Economic Reform in the Interregnum between Andropov and Gorbachev–Ryzhkov, in: M. Ellman and V. Kontorovich (eds.). The Destruction of the Soviet Economic System: An Insiders’ History Armonk. NY: ME Sharpe.
- Rodrik, D.(2015) Premature deindustrialization. NBER Working Paper series 20935. Cambridge MA: NBER.
- Thủ tướng Chính phủ (2021). Quyết định số 531/QĐ-TTg “Phê duyệt Chiến lược tổng thể phát triển khu vực dịch vụ của Việt Nam thời kỳ 2021 - 2030, tầm nhìn đến năm 2050” [Prime minister. Decision No. 531/QD-TTg “Approving the general strategy for development of the Vietnamese services sector for 2021-2030, and the vision for the period to 2050”]. April 1.
- UNDP (2005). Services Sector Development: A key to Viet Nam's Sustainable Growth. Hanoi: UNDP.
- World Bank 1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- World Bank (1995). Viet Nam Economic report on industrialization and industrial policy. Report No. 14645-VN. Washington DC: World Bank.
Supplementary files
