Testing BLUP methodology for large white pigs selection
- Autores: Otradnov P.I.1, Osipova O.S.1, Belous A.A.1
-
Afiliações:
- Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L.K. Ernst
- Edição: Volume 108, Nº 1 (2025)
- Páginas: 60-72
- Seção: Breeding, selection, genetics
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2658-3135/article/view/290006
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-108-1-60
- ID: 290006
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The article examines the convergence of BLUP-based (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) estimates of economically important traits in Large White pigs using different biometric models. The results indicate that significant differences in model quality, reflected particularly in coefficients of determination, lead to considerable discrepancies in evaluation outcomes. For instance, the highest convergence was observed for the FCR (feed conversion ratio) trait: at the population level, the repeatability coefficient was 0.981, with average rank differences for the 20 most reliably evaluated individuals amounting to ∆ = -19.05. Meanwhile, the difference in the coefficients of determination of the models used was 6.2%. The lowest convergence was observed for the BWG (body weight gain) trait, where the repeatability coefficient was 0.720, and the rank difference reached ∆ = 119.55. The coefficients of determination for the models used to assess this trait differed by 27%, or 1.81 times. Such discrepancies under simulated conditions of limited availability of primary zootechnical accounting data underscore both the necessity of considering the full range of available variables affecting the variability of the evaluated trait and the importance of using the same set of variables to ensure comparability of results.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Petr Otradnov
Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L.K. Ernst
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: serionard@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1153-5815
Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Genetic Technologies in Aquatic and Agricultural Farms
Rússia, DubrovitsyOlesya Osipova
Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L.K. Ernst
Email: olesa.117@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0009-0006-2454-7379
Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Genetic Technologies in Aquatic and Agricultural Farms
Rússia, DubrovitsyAnna Belous
Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L.K. Ernst
Email: belousa663@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7533-4281
Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior Research, Head of Laboratory Genetic Technologies in Aquatic and Agricultural Farms
Rússia, DubrovitsyBibliografia
- Sermyagin AA, Belous AA, Conte AF, Filipchenko AA, Ermilov AN, Yanchukov IN, Plemyashov KV, Brem G, Zinovieva NA. Genomic evaluation of bulls for daughters’ milk traits in Russian Black-and-White and Holstein cattle population through the validation procedure. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology]. 2017;52(6):1148-1156. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.6.1148eng
- Ignatyeva LP. Comparative characteristics of the animals of Simmental breed of different origin on the basis of the estimates breeding value of the cows by the BLUP ANIMAL MODEL method in connection with the level of herd productivity. Bulletin of KSAU. 2020;11(164):152-161. doi: 10.36718/1819-4036-2020-11-152-161
- Naryshkina EN, Sermyagin AA, Otradnov PI, Ermilov AN. Variability of estimates of the fertility of the semen of bulls during insemination of cows of different ages. Journal of Dairy and Beef Cattle Breeding. 2024;2:10-13. doi: 10.33943/MMS.2024.67.22.003
- Belous AA, Otradnov PI, Sermyagin AA, Zinovieva NA. The use of genomic evaluation in pig breeding: monograph. Dubrovitsy: L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for animal Husbandry; 2024: 209 p.
- Kalashnikov AE, Gosteva ER. Programming language R as a tool for calculating the breeding value of animals. Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2019;3:106-113. doi: 10.25687/1996-6733.prodanimbiol.2019.3.106-113
- Novikov AA, Suslina EN, Pokhodnya GS, Shichkin DG, Khabibrakhmanova YA, Bashmakova NV. Selection of sows by genetic markers and BLUP index. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2021;4:94-107. doi: 10.26897/0021-342X-2021-4-94-107
- Otradnov PI, Rudiyanov DM, Belous AA. Validation of breeding value estimates for Duroc pigs by feeding behavior traits. Pigbreeding. 2023;5:22-26. doi: 10.37925/0039-713X-2023-5-22-26
- Suslina EN, Novikov AA, Pavlova SV, Bashmakova NV, et al. Evaluation of breeding qualities of hog producers using the BLUP method. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2019;6:150-161. doi: 10.34677/0021-342х-2019-6-150-161
- Kalashnikov AE, Golubkov AI, Shchegolkov NF, Gosteva ER. Problems and issues in forecasting the genetic breeding value of agricultural animals. Vestnik NSAU. 2022;4:77-96. doi: 10.31677/2072-6724-2022-65-4-77-96
- Romanenkova OS, Kostyunina OV. Diagnosis of a mutation in the PHKG1 gene that determines PSE syndrome in pigs. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023;106(4):68-79. https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-106-4-68
- Stolpovskiy YuA, Piskunov AK, Svishcheva GR. Genomic selection. I. Latest trends and future trajectories. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2020;56(9):1006-1017. doi: 10.31857/S0016675820090143
- Haynatsky VYu. BLUP Method of breeding assessment of beef sires. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2021;104(1):20-31. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-104-1-20
- Selionova MI, Gladkikh MYu, Sermyagin AA, Lashneva IA. Comparative analysis of the goat and sheep milk component composition. Proceedings of Kuban State Agrarian University. 2023;108:204-211. doi: 10.21515/1999-1703-108-204-211
- Chistyakov VT. Modern development of breeding and genetics in the Russian pig breeding. Vestnik of Voronezh State Agrarian University. 2018;4(59):71-78. doi: 10.17238/issn2071-2243.2018.4.71
- Yakovlev AF. Genomic selection and prediction of offspring quality in animals. Vestnik of Russian Academy of Science. 2018;88(10):946-950. doi: 10.31857/S086958730002151-4
- Jibrila I, ten Napel J, Vandenplas J, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL. Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals. Genetics Selection Evolution. 2020;52(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00562-6
- Lourenco D, Tsuruta S, Aguilar I, Masuda Y, Bermann M, Legarra A, Misztal I. Recent updates in the BLUPF90 software suite. In: Veerkamp RF, de Haas Y, editors. Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP);2023:1530-1533. doi: 10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_366
- Melnikova E, Kabanov A, Nikitin S, et al. Application of genomic data for reliability improvement of pig breeding value estimates. Animals. 2021;11(6):1557. doi: 10.3390/ani11061557
Arquivos suplementares
