Evaluation of osteogenesis processes against the background of experimental osteoporosis therapy
- Authors: Bayramov A.A.1,2, Mamina N.S.2, Lisovskiy D.А.2, Fedorov N.A.2, Karonova T.L.1, Shabanov P.D.2
-
Affiliations:
- Almazov National Medical Research Centre
- Institute of Experimental Medicine
- Issue: Vol 21, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 273-282
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/RCF/article/view/163809
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RCF567788
- ID: 163809
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Osteoporosis is a problem all over the world with important clinical and economic consequences. A significant contribution to solving the problem of the spread of osteoporosis can be the creation of drugs based on unique biologically active compounds.
The aim was to evaluate the processes of osteogenesis, according to the formation of an organic matrix of bone tissue, as well as to evaluate markers of bone remodeling in blood serum at the stages of anti-osteoporosis therapy.
Materials and methods. The study was performed on an experimental model of osteoporosis using biochemical methods for analyzing markers of osteoporosis in blood serum, as well as atomic absorption spectroscopy and X-ray densitometry.
Results. According to the results of the study, the specific anti-osteoporotic activity of the new drug based on succinic acid salts was proved - a significant increase in the organic component – the total collagen in bone tissue and the mineral component - the main elements in bone tissue in both young and old senile animals. Evaluation of the dynamics of the content of markers of bone remodeling showed the high effectiveness of the new drug in monotherapy, and in combination with vitamin D3 in the activation of osteogenesis processes in experimental osteoporosis.
Conclusion. The effectiveness of the proposed anti-osteoporotic agent is shown, which is more pronounced in senile rats and is due to a proportional increase in the organic and mineral components of bone tissue.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Alekber A. Bayramov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre; Institute of Experimental Medicine
Author for correspondence.
Email: alekber@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0673-8722
SPIN-code: 9802-9988
Dr. Med. Sci. (Pharmacology), leading research associate, Institute of Endocrinology; leading research associate, Departmant of Neuropharmacology
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgNailya Sh. Mamina
Institute of Experimental Medicine
Email: mamina@yandex.ru
postgraduate student
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgDmitriy А. Lisovskiy
Institute of Experimental Medicine
Email: lisovskiy_d_med@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 8261-4465
postgraduate student
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgNikita A. Fedorov
Institute of Experimental Medicine
Email: 1701221@mail.ru
laboratory assistant
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgTatiana L. Karonova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Email: karonova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1547-0123
SPIN-code: 3337-4071
Dr. Med. Sci. (Endocrinology), head of the Laboratory of Clinical Endocrinology
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgPetr D. Shabanov
Institute of Experimental Medicine
Email: pdshabanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1464-1127
SPIN-code: 8974-7477
Dr. Med. Sci. (Pharmacology), professor and head, Departmant of Neuropharmacology
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Bairamov AA, Maevsky EI, Shabanov PD. Correction of bone remodeling in experimental osteoporosis. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2019;17(4):43–50. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/RCF17443-50
- Bairamov AA, Mamina NS, Karonova TL, Shabanov PD. Possibilities of in vivo validation of a model of experimental osteoporosis. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2020;18(4):365–367. (In Russ.) doi: 10.7816/RCF184365-367
- Grebennikova TA, Belaya ZE, Rozhinskaya LY, Melnichenko GA. The canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway: From the history of its discovery to clinical application. Therapeutic archive. 2016;88(10):74–81. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/terarkh201688674-81
- Dobronravov VA. Current view on the pathophysiology of secondary hyperparathyroidism: role of fibroblast growth factor 23 and klotho. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2011;15(4):11–20. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24884/1561-6274-2011-15-4-11-20
- Zamaraeva TV. Metod opredeleniya soderzhaniya kollagenovykh belkov po oksiprolinu. Ed. by V.N. Orekhovich. Sovremennye metody v biokhimii. Moscow: Meditsina, 1977. P. 262–264. (In Russ.)
- Kettail VM, Arki RA. Patofiziologiya ehndokrinnoi sistemy. Ed. by Yu.V. Natochin, N.A. Smirnov; transl. from eng. M.G. Koroleva, E.V. Kuchinskii. Moscow: Binom, 2022. 335 p. (In Russ.)
- Kotel’nikov GP, Bulgakov SV. Osteoporoz. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2010. 504 p. (In Russ.)
- Kronenberg GM, Melamed SH, Polonski KS, Larsen PR. Ehndokrinologiya po Vil’yamsonu. Reproduktivnaya ehndokrinologiya. Moscow: Rid Elsiver. 2011. 410 p. (In Russ.)
- Levitskii AP, Makarenko OA, Den’ga OV, et al. Ehksperimental’nye metody issledovaniya stimulyatorov osteogeneza: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Kyiv: Avitsenna, 2005. P. 31–38. (In Russ.)
- Lesniak OM. Osteoporosis audit in the Russian Federation. The Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2011;14(2):7–10. (In Russ.)
- Maevskii EI, Grishina EV, Khaustova YaV, et al. Vnov’ o preparatakh, soderzhashchikh suktsinat. Gastroehnterologiya Sankt-Peterburga. 2017;(1):91–92. (In Russ.)
- Maevskii EI, Roshchenfel’d AS, Grishina EV, Kondrashova MN. Korrektsiya metabolicheskogo atsidoza putem podderzhaniya funktsii mitokhondrii (monografiya). Pushino: ITEHB RAN, 2001, 155 p. (In Russ.)
- Maevskii EI, Uchitel’ ML, Bairamov AA, et al. Korrektsiya gormonal’noi aktivnosti substratnymi kompozitsiyami u muzhchin i zhenshchin. Gastroehnterologiya Sankt-Peterburga. 2017;(2–3): 55–56. (In Russ.)
- GOST 33044–2014 “Printsipy nadlezhashchei laboratornoi praktiki”. (In Russ.)
- Kondrashova MN, Dynnik VV, Kaminskii YuG, et al editors. Mitokhondrial’nye protsessy vo vremennoi organizatsii zhiznedeyatel’nosti. Pushchino, 1978. 182 p. (In Russ.)
- Kondrashova MN, Kaminskii YuG, Maevskogo EI, editors. Yantarnaya kislota v meditsine, pishchevoi promyshlennosti, sel’skom khozyaistve. Pushchino: Institut teoreticheskoi i ehksperimental’noi terapii, 1996. 300 p. (In Russ.)
- Patent RU № 2582973/ 2016.04.27. Bairamov AA, Shabanov PD, Maevskii EI, et al. Antiosteoporoznoe sredstvo. (In Russ.)
- Povoroznyuk VV, Grigor’eva NV. Menopauza i osteoporoz. Kyiv: Zdorov’e, 2004. 356 p. (In Russ.)
- Riggz BL, Melton D. Osteoporoz. Ehtiologiya, diagnostika, lechenie. Moscow: Binom, 2000. P. 309–313. (In Russ.)
- Khodzhson S. Klinika Mehio ob Osteoporoze. Moscow: Astrel’, 2007. 237 p. (In Russ.)
- Kondrashova MN, editor. Terapevticheskoe deistvie yantarnoi kisloty. Pushchino: Nauchnyi tsentr biologicheskikh issledovanii AN SSSR, 1976. 255 p. (In Russ.)
- Frol’kis VV, Povoroznyuk VV, Evtushenko OA, Grigor’eva NV. Ehksperimental’nyi osteoporoz. Doctor. 2003;(6):48–52. (In Russ.)
- Sharaev PN. Metod opredeleniya svobodnogo i svyazannogo oksiprolina v syvorotke krovi. Laboratornoe delo. 1981;(5):283–285. (In Russ.)
- Shutov EV. Value of the factor of growth in the fibroblasts FGF-23 in patients with chronic renal disease. Survey. LVrach. 2012;(8): 35–42. (In Russ.)
- Bolland MJ, Grey AB, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(3):1174–1181. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0852
- Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC, et al. Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporosis Int. 2000;11:556–561. doi: 10.1007/s001980070075
- EFFO, NOF. Who are candidates for prevention and treatment for osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:1–6. doi: 10.1007/BF01623453
- IOF. Annual report. 2010. 18 p.
- Kanis JA, WHO Scientific Group. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level technical report Sheffield. UK: WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, 2008.
- Kneissel M. The promise of sclerostin inhibition for the treatment of osteoporosis. IBMS BoneKEy. 2009;6(7):259–264. doi: 10.1138/20090388
- MacLean C, Newberry S, Maglione M, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med. 2007;148:197–213. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00198
- Bonnik SL, Harris ST, Kendler DL, et al. Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of the north american menopause society. Menopause. 2010;17(1):25–54. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181c617e6
- NOF. Disease statistics. 2004.
- NOF. Advocacy news and updates. American’s bone health: The state of osteoporosis and low bone mass. 2011.
- Silverman SL. Sclerostin. J Osteoporos. 2010;2010:941419. doi: 10.4061/2010/941419
- Sims NA, Chia LY. Regulation of sclerostin expression by paracrine and endocrine factors. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab. 2012;10:98–107. doi: 10.1007/s12018-011-9121-7
- Vasilieva AA, Simonova MA, Bairamov AA, et al. Сorrection of the functional state of female rats after unilateral ovariectomy using a succinate containing composition. Cardiometry. 2017;(10):86–92. doi: 10.12710/cardiometry.2017.8692
- Vega D, Maalouf NM, Sakhaee K. The role of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK)/RANK ligand/osteoprotegerin: clinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(12):4514–4521. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0646
- WHO. FRAX® WHO fracture risk assessment tool: calculation tool. 2011.
