Military medicine of modern hybrid wars

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

During the hybrid armed conflict in which Russia became involved — the Special Military Operation — the medical service of the Armed Forces faced a number of challenges. This review analyzes foreign publications indexed in PubMed® concerning the conditions and factors affecting the activities of the medical services of armed forces, primarily those of NATO countries. It was revealed that a limiting factor for operational effectiveness is the staffing levels and qualitative composition of medical personnel, their preparedness to provide care for the specific pathologies of wartime, and maintaining these competencies in an up-to-date state. Important conditions for successful provision of medical care are preserving the integrity of medical facilities during targeted attacks on them, and the ability to use infrastructure in hostile or newly occupied territories. Prehospital care serves as a limiting factor in reducing lethality, with the main causes being fatal hemorrhages and head injuries from mine-blast trauma. Proper tourniquet application, rapid evacuation, and blood transfusions make the greatest contribution to reducing prehospital mortality. Among casualties, those with limb wounds are most significant, as they subsequently create the greatest social burden on the state, exceeding the “years lived with disability” parameter for all other disease classes, including oncological and cardiovascular diseases. In modern conflicts, the most dangerous in terms of lethality are mine-blast injuries (61.4–83.5%) and head injuries (20.9–59.0%), and in terms of subsequent disease burden, limb injuries (45.7%) constitute an absolute majority and are the point of focus for the main efforts of the medical services of the warring states’ armed forces. At the same time, there are no unified approaches regarding the place of application of qualified and specialized care among countries.

About the authors

Dmitrii V. Ovchinnikov

Military Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: dv.ovchinnikov-vma@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8408-5301
SPIN-code: 5437-3457

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Evgeniy V. Ivchenko

Military Medical Academy

Email: 8333535@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5582-1111
SPIN-code: 5228-1527

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Khorram-Manesh A, Burkle FMJr. Civilian population victimization: a systematic review comparing humanitarian and health outcomes in conventional and hybrid warfare. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 2022;17:e192. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.96
  2. Witzenhausen M, Brill S, Schmidt R, et al. Aktuelle Mortalität von Kriegsverletzungen — eine narrative Übersichtsarbeit. Chirurgie. 2024;95:546–554. (In German) doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02081-2
  3. Bricknell M, Lin CY, Bailey Z. Non-combatant status of military medicine and contemporary warfare: old issues or new problems? BMJ Mil Health. 2024;170(2):97–98. doi: 10.1136/military-2022-002161
  4. Gauss T, de Jongh M, Maegele M, Cole E, Bouzat P. Trauma systems in high socioeconomic index countries in 2050. Critical Care. 2024;28(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04863-w
  5. Tallach R, Einav S, Brohi K, et al. Learning from terrorist mass casualty incidents: a global survey. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(2): e168–e179. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.003
  6. Lawry LL, Korona-Bailey J, Juman L, et al. A qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providers. Confl Health. 2024;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00570-z
  7. GBD2019 Human Resources for Health Collaborators. Measuring the availability of human resources for health and its relationship to universal health coverage for 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2022;399(10341):2129–2154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00532-3
  8. GBD2019 Universal Health Coverage Collaborators. Measuring universal health coverage based on an index of effective coverage of health services in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1250–1284. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30750-9
  9. Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995–2050. Lancet. 2019;393(10187):2233–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4
  10. Baker JB, Keenan S, Duquette-Frame TA, et al. Analysis of the U.S. military trauma system in accordance with doctrinal levels of warfare. Mil Med. 2024;189(5–6):1098–1105. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad053
  11. Holm E, Cook J, Porter K, et al. A quantitative and qualitative literature analysis of the orthopedic surgeons’ experience: reflecting on 20 years in the global war on terror. Mil Med. 2023;188(9–10): 2924–2931. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac219
  12. Cannon JW, Gross KR, Rasmussen TE. Combating the peacetime effect in military medicine. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(1):5–6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1930
  13. Anagnostou E, Michas A, Giannou C. Practicing military medicine in truly austere environments: what to expect, how to prepare, when to improvise. Mil Med. 2020;185(5–6):e656–e661. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz467
  14. Antebi B, Benov A, Mann-Salinas EA, et al. Analysis of injury patterns and roles of care in US and Israel militaries during recent conflicts: Two are better than one. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81 (5 Suppl 2):S87–S94. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001252
  15. Cai YL, Ju JT, Liu WB, Zhang J. Military trauma and surgical procedures in conflict area: a review for the utilization of forward surgical team. Mil Med. 2018;183(3–4):e97–e106. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx048
  16. Cant MR, Naumann DN, Swain C, et al. Acquisition and retention of military surgical competencies: a survey of surgeons’ experiences in the UK Defence Medical Services. BMJ Mil Health. 2024;170(2):117–122. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2022-002112
  17. Hall A, Olsen C, Dribben W, Glaser J, Hanson M. Aeromedical evacuation, the expeditionary medicine learning curve, and the peacetime effect. Mil Med. 2024;189(3–4):e843–e847. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad353
  18. Richards CRN, Joel C, Dickens JF. Review of a Role 2 in Afghanistan: understanding the data on medical and surgical volumes in a deployed setting. Mil Med. 2021;186(5–6):e599–e605. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa472
  19. Chiniard T, Boutonnet M, Duron S, et al. Profile of injuries in recent warfare. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95(2S):S79–S87. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004034
  20. MacGregor AJ, Zouris JM, Dougherty AL, Dye JL. The Psychological Consequences of Combat Injury Among U.S. Navy Health Care Personnel. Mil Med. 2024;189(3–4):742–747. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac298
  21. Regalbuto E, Stone A, Taylor J, Shiau D, Wilson R. Understanding the strengths and limitations of current methods for surveying partner nation medical facilities. Mil Med. 2024;189(3–4):e835–e842. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad362
  22. Howard JT, Kotwal RS, Stern CA, et al. Use of combat casualty care data to assess the US military trauma system during the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts, 2001–2017. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(7):600–608. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0151
  23. Haverkamp F.J.C., Van Dongen T.T.C.F., Edwards M.J.R., et al. European military surgical teams in combat theater: A survey study on deployment preparation and experience. Injury. 2024;55(5):111320. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111320
  24. Baker MS, Baker JB, Burkle FM. Arming hospital ships of the future: hybrid wars require a major change. Mil Med. 2024;189(1–2): e110–e118. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad118
  25. Alnahhas H, Mishori R, Heisler M. Hospitals and healthcare workers must be protected from the waging of war. BMJ. 2022;376: o764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o764
  26. MacGregor AJ, Zouris JM, Dougherty AL, Dye JL. The psychological consequences of combat injury among U.S. navy health care personnel. Mil Med. 2024;189(3–4):742–747. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac298
  27. Ünlü A, Cetinkaya RA, Ege T, et al. Role 2 military hospitals: results of a new trauma care concept on 170 casualties. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41(2):149–155. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0472-x
  28. Kotwal RS, Scott LLF, Janak JC, et al. The effect of prehospital transport time, injury severity, and blood transfusion on survival of US military casualties in Iraq. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85 (1S Suppl 2):S112–S121. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001798
  29. Gurney JM, Staudt AM, Holcomb JB, et al. Finding the bleeding edge: 24-hour mortality by unit of blood product transfused in combat casualties from 2002–2020. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95(5):635–641. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004028
  30. Chen J, Tsur AM, Nadler R, et al. Ten-year reduction in thoracic injury-related mortality among Israel Defense Forces soldiers. BMJ Mil Health. 2023;169(6):510–516. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-001986
  31. Parker P, Johnston AM, Mountain A, et al. Battlefield REBOA: aces high or journey’s end? BMJ Mil Health. 2023;169(6):482–484. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002054
  32. Parker W, Despain RW, Bailey J, et al. Military experience in the management of pelvic fractures from OIF/OEF. BMJ Mil Health. 2023;169(2):108–111. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001469
  33. de Carbonnières A, Moritz C, Destan C, et al. A decade in the battlefield (2004–2014): A French military perspective on the high mortality associated with non-exclusively orthopedic or brain combat injuries. Injury. 2020;51(9):2046–2050. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.035
  34. Kotwal RS, Staudt AM, Mazuchowski EL, et al. A US military Role 2 forward surgical team database study of combat mortality in Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(3):603–612. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001997
  35. Martin M, Oh J, Currier H, et al. An analysis of in-hospital deaths at a modern combat support hospital. J Trauma. 2009;66(4S): S51–S60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819d86ad
  36. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182755dcc
  37. Keene DD, Penn-Barwell JG, Wood PR, et al. Died of wounds: a mortality review. J R Army Med Corps. 2016;162(5):355–360. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2015-000490
  38. Radford BJ, Dai Y, Stoehr N, et al. Estimating conflict losses and reporting biases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2023;120(34):e2307372120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307372120
  39. Quinn J, Panasenko SI, Leshchenko Ya, et al. Prehospital lessons from the war in Ukraine: damage control resuscitation and surgery experiences from point of injury to role 2. Mil Med. 2024;189(1–2): 17–29. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad253
  40. Yatsun V. Application of hemostatic tourniquet on wounded extremities in modern “trench” warfare: the view of a vascular surgeon. Mil Med. 2024;189(№ 1–2):332–336. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac208
  41. Stewart IJ, Poltavskiy E, Howard JT, et al. The enduring health consequences of combat trauma: a legacy of chronic disease. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(3):713–721. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06195-1
  42. Langan NR, Eckert M, Martin MJ. Changing patterns of in-hospital deaths following implementation of damage control resuscitation practices in US forward military treatment facilities. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(9):904–912. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.940
  43. Stevens RA, Baker MS, Zubach OB, Samotowka M. Misuse of tourniquets in Ukraine may be costing more lives and limbs than they save. Mil Med. 2024: usad503. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad503. Online ahead of print.
  44. Holcomb JB, Dorlac WC, Drew BG, et al. Rethinking limb tourniquet conversion in the prehospital environment. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95(6):e54–e60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004134
  45. Kaymak Ş, Ünlü A, Şenocak R, et al. Results of combat medic junctional tourniquet training: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024;30(1):20–26. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.13263
  46. Flecha I, Naylor JF, Schauer SG et al. Combat lifesaver-trained, first-responder application of junctional tourniquets: a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. Mil Med Res. 2018;5(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40779-018-0178-1
  47. Saadah NH, Wood EM, Bailey MJ, et al. Age of red blood cells is not associated with in-hospital mortality in massively transfused patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(2):279–286. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003192
  48. Dilday J, Owattanapanich N, Benjamin ER, et al. Operative management and outcomes of colorectal injuries after gunshot wounds in the deployed military setting versus civilian trauma centers. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95(2S Suppl 1):S60–S65. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004016
  49. Goldman C, Shaw N, du Plessis D, et al. Gunshot wounds to the penis and scrotum: a narrative review of management in civilian and military settings. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(6):2596–2608. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1175
  50. Glasgow SC, Steele SR, Duncan JE, Rasmussen TE. Epidemiology of modern battlefield colorectal trauma: a review of 977 coalition casualties. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S503–538. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182754759

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».