Analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer in 2015 and 2022
- Authors: Shishkina G.A.1, Petryashev A.V.1, Erokhina E.A.1, Topuzov R.E.1, Khalukhoeva Z.A.1, Runova A.V.1, Kuznetsova A.A.1, Kruglov I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Issue: Vol 16, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 118-125
- Section: Original research
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/vszgmu/article/view/276658
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/mechnikov631984
- ID: 276658
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The surgical management of colorectal cancer remains an urgent problem. In the surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer, reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage, the length of hospital stay and improving the prognosis of the disease are of great importance.
AIM: To compare the results of treatment of patients with colorectal cancer before and after the introduction into clinical practice of optimisation methods adopted in the clinics of the Department of Hospital Surgery named after V.A. Oppel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis of treatment outcomes in 101 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer in the Clinic of Hospital Surgery named after. V.A. Oppel, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov in 2015 and 2022. All the patients were divided into 2 groups: in 2022 the study included 57 patients, who made up group A; in 2015, the clinic treated 44 patients, who were included in group B. The largest number of patients in both groups had stage II of the disease: in group A — 31 patients (54%), in group B — 19 patients (43%).
RESULTS: The average length of hospital stay was 12.16 days in 2022, in 2015 — 15.95 days in the patients with uncomplicated postoperative period; with the development of postoperative complications, the hospital stay reached 31 days. The share of laparoscopic surgery in 2015 was 47.7%. In 2022 it was 74.1%. In 2022, 8 patients were diagnosed with complications in the early postoperative period (complication rate — 14.0%). In 2015, complications were identified in 10 people (complication rate was 22.7%). Thus, the tactics we used in the surgical phase of the complex treatment of colorectal cancer patients made it possible to reduce the incidence of early postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage). In group B, 6 (85.7%) patients who developed this complication required repeated surgery. In group A, only 4 (50%) patients required repeated surgical treatment, two of them required minimally invasive interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the following study show that optimisation of the perioperative management of patients, prevention of postoperative complications, individualisation of the treatment approach can reduce the length of hospital stay.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Galina A. Shishkina
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: Galina.Shishkina@szgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-6875-039X
SPIN-code: 6765-1266
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAlexey V. Petryashev
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: Aleksei.Petryashev@szgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-3919-5470
SPIN-code: 1724-2067
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgElena A. Erokhina
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: Elena.Erokhina@szgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-3038-0706
SPIN-code: 6267-7608
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgRustem E. Topuzov
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: Rustem.topuzov@szgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8168-6187
SPIN-code: 5904-9165
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgZamira A. Khalukhoeva
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Author for correspondence.
Email: zamihaluhoeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2047-4324
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Anastasia V. Runova
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: doc@arunova.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-3755-6137
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Anna A. Kuznetsova
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: Anika8820@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6901-9004
SPIN-code: 9077-0209
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Ivan V. Kruglov
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: kv-71312@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-6202-6499
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
References
- Alekseev MV, Shelygin YuA, Rybakov EG. Methods of anastomotic leakage prevention. A systematic review. Koloproktologia. 2015;(4(54)):46–56. EDN: UQCVBJ
- Shelygin IuA, Achkasov SI, Sushkov OI, Zapol’ski AG. Is single laparoscopic access safe in surgery of the colon? Endoscopic Surgery. 2014;20(3):3–5. EDN: SXMRAJ
- Glushkov NI, Gorshenin TL. Video assisted operations in the treatment of complicated forms of colon cancer in elderly and senile patients. Herald of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov. 2014;6(4):7–11. EDN: TYFZBF doi: 10.17816/mechnikov2014647-11
- Erokhina EA, Topuzov EG, Topuzov EE, et al. Diagnostic criterions of postoperative intra-abdominal complications of colorectal cancer. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2016;(3):36–39. EDN: YJMFKJ
- Zaridze DG, Kaprin AD, Stilidi IS. Dynamics of morbidity and mortality from malignant tumors in Russia. Problems in Oncology. 2018;64(5):578–591. (In Russ.) EDN: YMKCAX
- Navmatulja AYu, Solov’ev IA, Litvinov OA, et al. The differentiated way of forming preventive stomas in surgery of the rectal cancer. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center. 2016;11(2):54–57. EDN: UGDFHJ
- Kislitsyna ON, Topuzov RE, Petryashev AV, et al. The score system of assessing the risk of anastomosis leakage in colorectal operations. Ural Medical Journal. 2016;(8):137–144. EDN: WZJTPJ
- Kislitsyna ON. Optimization of diagnostics and treatment of complications after colon surgery [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2019. 145 p. (In Russ.). EDN: APLLNY
- Merabishvili VM. Oncological statistics (traditional methods, new information technologies). Guidelines for physicians. Part I. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg: KOSTA; 2015. 223 p. (In Russ.)
- Karachun AM, Petrov AS, Samsonov DV, Petrova EA. The place of laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer. Practical Oncology. 2012;13(4):261–268. (In Russ.) EDN: PUHUOX
- Petryashev AV. Preventive stomas in the treatment of colorectal cancer [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2020. 142 p. (In Russ.) EDN: KNNZUS
- Topuzov RE. Optimization of indications for the use of laparoscopic technologies at the surgical stage of colorectal cancer treatment [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2015. 109 p. (In Russ.)
- Januskevics SV, Januskevics VY. Protection of an anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery. Surgery news. 2017;25(4):412–420. EDN: ZCRXGV doi: 10.18484/2305-0047.2017.4.412
- Tortorelli AP, Alfieri S, Sanchez AM, et al. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: incidence, risk factors, and management. Am Surg. 2015;81(1):41–47.
- Sopik V, Phelan C, Cybulski C, Narod SA. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and the risk for colorectal cancer. Clin Genet. 2015;87(5):411–418. doi: 10.1111/cge.12497
- Thanikachalam K, Khan G. Colorectal cancer and nutrition. Nutrients. 2019;11(1):164. doi: 10.3390/nu11010164
- Weitz J, Koch M, Debus J, et al. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2005;365(9454):153–165. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17706-X
- Nasseri Y, Langenfeld SJ. Imaging for colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2017;97(3):503–513. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.01.002
- van Vugt JL, Reisinger KW, Derikx JP, et al. Improving the outcomes in oncological colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(35):12445–12457. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12445
- Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):655–662. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762
- Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, et al. Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(6):e277–e296. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02985.x
- Reischl S, Wilhelm DF, Neumann PA, et al. Peri- and postoperative nutrition in colorectal cancer patients. Ther Umsch. 2018;75(10):642–648. (In German). doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001052
- Kijima S, Sasaki T, Nagata K, et al. Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(45):16964–16975. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16964
- Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147(3):339–351. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012
Supplementary files
