Email this article A comparative analysis of the active and residual magnetization methods in the nondestructive testing of rails
- Authors: Antipov A.G.1, Markov A.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- St. Petersburg State University
- OAO Radioavionica
- Issue: Vol 52, No 3 (2016)
- Pages: 155-160
- Section: Magnetic and Electromagnetic Methods
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1061-8309/article/view/181114
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830916030037
- ID: 181114
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The comparison of residual Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) with traditional MFL method was carried out as applied to rail nondestructive testing. The mechanisms for the residual magnetization of rails are considered. It is concluded that the traditional Magnetic Flux Leakage method is more effective as compared with one based on а rail remanence.
Keywords
About the authors
A. G. Antipov
St. Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: a.antipov@phys.spbu.ru
Russian Federation, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199164
A. A. Markov
OAO Radioavionica
Email: a.antipov@phys.spbu.ru
Russian Federation, Troitskii pr. 4b, St. Petersburg, 190103
Supplementary files
