A comparative analysis of the active and residual magnetization methods in the nondestructive testing of rails
- Авторлар: Antipov A.G.1, Markov A.A.2
-
Мекемелер:
- St. Petersburg State University
- OAO Radioavionica
- Шығарылым: Том 52, № 3 (2016)
- Беттер: 155-160
- Бөлім: Magnetic and Electromagnetic Methods
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1061-8309/article/view/181114
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830916030037
- ID: 181114
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
The comparison of residual Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) with traditional MFL method was carried out as applied to rail nondestructive testing. The mechanisms for the residual magnetization of rails are considered. It is concluded that the traditional Magnetic Flux Leakage method is more effective as compared with one based on а rail remanence.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
A. Antipov
St. Petersburg State University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: a.antipov@phys.spbu.ru
Ресей, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199164
A. Markov
OAO Radioavionica
Email: a.antipov@phys.spbu.ru
Ресей, Troitskii pr. 4b, St. Petersburg, 190103
Қосымша файлдар
