Comparison of Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies
- Авторы: Shadrin A.Y.1, Ivanov V.B.1, Skupov M.V.1, Troyanov V.M.2, Zherebtsov A.A.2
-
Учреждения:
- Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
- Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
- Выпуск: Том 121, № 2 (2016)
- Страницы: 119-126
- Раздел: Article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1063-4258/article/view/247862
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0171-2
- ID: 247862
Цитировать
Аннотация
The aim of this work is to compare different approaches to nuclear fuel cycle closure from the standpoint of plutonium utilization, fuel type, and reprocessing technology. It is shown that the choice of mixed uraniumplutonium nitride fuel for fast reactors will make it possible to effectively close the NFC and at the same time develope safe nuclear power; the combined (pyrochemical + hydro) technology will make it possible to reprocess any type of high-burnup short-decayed irradiated fuel from fast reactors and to obtain the final uranium-plutonium-neptunium product suitable for use in any fuel production technology.
Об авторах
A. Shadrin
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Россия, Moscow
V. Ivanov
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Россия, Moscow
M. Skupov
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Россия, Moscow
V. Troyanov
Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Россия, Moscow
A. Zherebtsov
Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Россия, Moscow
Дополнительные файлы
