Comparison of Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The aim of this work is to compare different approaches to nuclear fuel cycle closure from the standpoint of plutonium utilization, fuel type, and reprocessing technology. It is shown that the choice of mixed uraniumplutonium nitride fuel for fast reactors will make it possible to effectively close the NFC and at the same time develope safe nuclear power; the combined (pyrochemical + hydro) technology will make it possible to reprocess any type of high-burnup short-decayed irradiated fuel from fast reactors and to obtain the final uranium-plutonium-neptunium product suitable for use in any fuel production technology.

About the authors

A. Yu. Shadrin

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

V. B. Ivanov

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

M. V. Skupov

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

V. M. Troyanov

Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. A. Zherebtsov

Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York