Comparison of Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies
- Authors: Shadrin A.Y.1, Ivanov V.B.1, Skupov M.V.1, Troyanov V.M.2, Zherebtsov A.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
- Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
- Issue: Vol 121, No 2 (2016)
- Pages: 119-126
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1063-4258/article/view/247862
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0171-2
- ID: 247862
Cite item
Abstract
The aim of this work is to compare different approaches to nuclear fuel cycle closure from the standpoint of plutonium utilization, fuel type, and reprocessing technology. It is shown that the choice of mixed uraniumplutonium nitride fuel for fast reactors will make it possible to effectively close the NFC and at the same time develope safe nuclear power; the combined (pyrochemical + hydro) technology will make it possible to reprocess any type of high-burnup short-decayed irradiated fuel from fast reactors and to obtain the final uranium-plutonium-neptunium product suitable for use in any fuel production technology.
About the authors
A. Yu. Shadrin
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
V. B. Ivanov
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
M. V. Skupov
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
V. M. Troyanov
Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
A. A. Zherebtsov
Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
Supplementary files
