Comparison of Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The aim of this work is to compare different approaches to nuclear fuel cycle closure from the standpoint of plutonium utilization, fuel type, and reprocessing technology. It is shown that the choice of mixed uraniumplutonium nitride fuel for fast reactors will make it possible to effectively close the NFC and at the same time develope safe nuclear power; the combined (pyrochemical + hydro) technology will make it possible to reprocess any type of high-burnup short-decayed irradiated fuel from fast reactors and to obtain the final uranium-plutonium-neptunium product suitable for use in any fuel production technology.

作者简介

A. Shadrin

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

V. Ivanov

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

M. Skupov

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

V. Troyanov

Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

A. Zherebtsov

Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2016