Comparison of Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies
- Autores: Shadrin A.Y.1, Ivanov V.B.1, Skupov M.V.1, Troyanov V.M.2, Zherebtsov A.A.2
-
Afiliações:
- Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
- Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
- Edição: Volume 121, Nº 2 (2016)
- Páginas: 119-126
- Seção: Article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/1063-4258/article/view/247862
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0171-2
- ID: 247862
Citar
Resumo
The aim of this work is to compare different approaches to nuclear fuel cycle closure from the standpoint of plutonium utilization, fuel type, and reprocessing technology. It is shown that the choice of mixed uraniumplutonium nitride fuel for fast reactors will make it possible to effectively close the NFC and at the same time develope safe nuclear power; the combined (pyrochemical + hydro) technology will make it possible to reprocess any type of high-burnup short-decayed irradiated fuel from fast reactors and to obtain the final uranium-plutonium-neptunium product suitable for use in any fuel production technology.
Sobre autores
A. Shadrin
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow
V. Ivanov
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow
M. Skupov
Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow
V. Troyanov
Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow
A. Zherebtsov
Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)
Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow
Arquivos suplementares
