Comparison of Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The aim of this work is to compare different approaches to nuclear fuel cycle closure from the standpoint of plutonium utilization, fuel type, and reprocessing technology. It is shown that the choice of mixed uraniumplutonium nitride fuel for fast reactors will make it possible to effectively close the NFC and at the same time develope safe nuclear power; the combined (pyrochemical + hydro) technology will make it possible to reprocess any type of high-burnup short-decayed irradiated fuel from fast reactors and to obtain the final uranium-plutonium-neptunium product suitable for use in any fuel production technology.

Sobre autores

A. Shadrin

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow

V. Ivanov

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow

M. Skupov

Bochvar High-Technology Research Institute for Inorganic Materials (VNIINM)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow

V. Troyanov

Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow

A. Zherebtsov

Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)

Email: j-atomicenergy@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2016