The Impact of ESG Controversies on Bank Value and Risk-Taking

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

ESG performance is one of the most important non-financial factors investors pay attention to when valuing a bank. Previous studies, devoted to bank ESG performance, rely solely on ESG ratings. The contribution of this paper to the existing literature is investigation of a new measure of ESG performance – ESG controversies. ESG controversies are covered in the media negative news that reflect a bank failure in ESG performance. The goal of this paper is to investigate the influence of negative ESG news on market value and stability of companies in a banking sector.
A cross-country sample of 134 banks and data on 1,200 controversies from 2016 to 2020 are used in this study. Our results provide evidence that ESG controversies negatively affect bank value and have no impact on its stability. However, the effect on share prices is not unified: it is stronger for banks that are in the scope of investor attention, and this relation is observed for developed markets with high freedom of press exclusively. Moreover, investors take into consideration the reason of ESG controversy occurrence. They react strongly to negative ESG news, related to community and workforce.

About the authors

M. Staroverova

Author for correspondence.
Email: mariyastaroverova06@gmail.com

References

  1. Bischof R., Bourdier N., Gassmann P., Wackerbeck P., Marek S. European bank transformation: Why banks can no longer ignore ESG. Strategy&. Dec. 07, 2021. URL: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/de/en/industries/financial-services/transforming-eu-banks/esg.html
  2. Schoenmaker D. From risk to opportunity: A framework for sustainable finance. Rotterdam: Erasmus University; 2017. 74 p. (RSM Series on Positive Change. Vol. 2). URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/101671
  3. Gangi F., Meles A., D’Angelo E., Daniele L.M. Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2019;26(3):529-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1699
  4. Glossner S. Repeat offenders: ESG incident recidivism and investor underreaction. 2021. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3004689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3004689
  5. Van Bergen B., McKenzie M., Mackintosh J. A new vision of value: Connecting corporate and societal value creation. Amstelveen: KPMG; 2014. 116 p. URL: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2014/10/a-new-vision-of-value-v1.pdf
  6. Henisz W., Koller T., Nuttall R. Five ways that ESG creates value. McKinsey Quarterly. 2019;(Nov.). URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Strategy%20and%20Corporate%20Finance/Our%20Insights/Five%20ways%20that%20ESG%20creates%20value/Five-ways-that-ESG-creates-value.ashx
  7. Bénabou R., Tirole J. Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica. 2010;77(305):1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x
  8. Lins K.V, Servaes H., Tamayo A. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance. 2017;72(4):1785-1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
  9. Do sustainable banks outperform? Driving value creation through ESG practices. London: Deloitte; 2019. 24 p. URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/lu/Documents/financial-services/Banking/lu-do-sustainable-banks-outperform-driving-value-creation-through-ESG-practices-report-digital.pdf
  10. Friede G., Busch T., Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2015;5(4):210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
  11. Al-Hiyari A., Kolsi M. How do stock market participants value ESG performance? Evidence from Middle Eastern and North African countries. Global Business Review. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211001511
  12. Fatemi A., Glaum M., Kaiser S. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal. 2018;38:45-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
  13. Harjoto M., Laksmana I. The impact of corporate social responsibility on risk taking and firm value. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018;151(2):353-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3202-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3202-y
  14. Wong W.C., Batten J.A., Ahmad A.H., Mohamed-Arshad S.B., Nordin S., Adzis A.A. Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters. 2021;39:101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101593
  15. Miralles-Quirós M.M., Miralles-Quirós J.L., Redondo Hernández J. ESG performance and shareholder value creation in the banking industry: International differences. Sustainability. 2019;11(5):1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051404
  16. Buallay A. Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality. 2019;30(1):98-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
  17. Bolton B.J. Corporate social responsibility and bank performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277912
  18. Azmi W., Hassan M.K., Houston R., Karim M.S. ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2021;70:101277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101277
  19. Di Tommaso C., Thornton J. Do ESG scores effect bank risk taking and value? Evidence from European banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2020;27(5):2286-2298. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1964
  20. Zhou G., Sun Y., Lou S., Liao J. Corporate social responsibility and bank financial performance in China: The moderating role of green credit. Energy Economics. 2021;97:105190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105190
  21. El-Chaarani H., Abraham R., Skaf Y. The impact of corporate governance on the financial performance of the banking sector in the MENA (Middle Eastern and North African) region: An immunity test of banks for COVID-19. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022;15(2):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020082
  22. Bubbico R., Giorgino M., Monda B. The impact of corporate governance on the market value of financial institutions: Empirical evidences from It a ly. Banks and Bank Systems. 2012;7(2):11-18. URL: https://www.businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/4641/BBS_en_2012_02_Bubbico.pdf
  23. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores from Refinitiv. London: Refinitiv; 2021. 24 p. URL: https://www.readkong.com/page/environmental-social-and-governance-esg-scores-from-2036071
  24. Chatterji A.K, Durand R., Levine D.I., Touboul S. Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors, and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal. 2016;37(8):1597-1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2407
  25. Zumente I., Lāce N. ESG rating – necessity for the investor or the company? Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168940
  26. Li F., Polychronopoulos A. What a difference an ESG ratings provider makes! Newport Beach, CA: Research Affiliates LLC; 2020. 15 p. URL: https://www.researchaffiliates.com/content/dam/ra/publications/pdf/770-what-a-difference-an-esg-ratings-provider-makes.pdf
  27. Cui B., Docherty P. Stock price overreaction to ESG controversies. 2020. URL: https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/2160940/MCFS-Research-Brief-01-20-Market-Over-reactions-to-ESG-Controversies.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3559915
  28. Wong J.B., Zhang Q. Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels. The British Accounting Review. 2022;54(1):101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101045
  29. Krüger P. Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics. 2015;115(2):304-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008
  30. Kang J., Kim A. The impact of media on corporate social responsibility. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2287002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2287002
  31. Derrien F., Krueger P., Landier A., Yao T. ESG news, future cash flows, and firm value. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper. 2021;(84). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3903274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3903274
  32. Aouadi A., Marsat S. Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018;151(4):1027-1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
  33. Chollet P., Sandwidi B.W. L’impact sur les marchés financiers européens de la diffusion d’alertes sociétales et de leurs évènements déclencheurs. Finance Contrôle Stratégie. 2016;19(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/fcs.1799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/fcs.1799
  34. Serafeim G., Yoon A. Which corporate ESG news does the market react to? Financial Analysts Journal. 2022;78(1):59-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1973879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1973879
  35. Dorfleitner G., Kreuzer C., Sparrer C. ESG controversies and controversial ESG: About silent saints and small sinners. Journal of Asset Management. 2020;21(5):393-412. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-020-00178-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-020-00178-x
  36. Servaes H., Tamayo A. The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science. 2013;59(5):1045-1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630
  37. ESG risks in banks: Effective strategies to use opportunities and mitigate risks. Amstelveen: KPMG; 2021. 32 p. URL: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2021/05/esg-risks-in-banks.pdf
  38. Chiaramonte L., Dreassi A., Girardone C., Piserà S. Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe. The European Journal of Finance. 2022;28(12):1173-1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1964556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1964556
  39. Leung W.S., Song W., Chen J. Does bank stakeholder orientation enhance financial stability? Journal of Corporate Finance. 2019;56:38-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.01.003
  40. Anginer D., Demirguc-Kunt A., Huizinga H., Ma K. Corporate governance of banks and financial stability. Journal of Financial Economics. 2018;130(2):327-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.011
  41. Shakil M.H. Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy. 2021;72:102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144Get DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
  42. Da Z., Engelberg J., Gao P. In search of attention. The Journal of Finance. 2011;66(5):1461-1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01679.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01679.x
  43. Nazarova V., Lavrova V. Do ESG factors influence investment attractiveness of the public companies?Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2022;16(1):38-64. https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.16.1.2022.38-64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.16.1.2022.38-64
  44. Jiao Y. Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2010;34(10):2549-2561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.04.013
  45. Caprio G., Laeven L., Levine R. Governance and bank valuation. Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2007;16(4):584-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2006.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2006.10.003
  46. Roy A.D. Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica. 1952;20(3):431-449. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1907413
  47. Beck T., De Jonghe O., Schepens G. Bank competition and stability: Cross-country heterogeneity. Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2013;22(2):218-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2012.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2012.07.001
  48. Laeven L., Levine R. Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics. 2009;93(2):259-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.003
  49. Yuan T.-T., Gu X.-A., Yuan Y.-M., Lu J.-J., Ni B.-P. Research on the impact of bank competition on stability – Empirical evidence from 4631 banks in US. Heliyon. 2022;8(4):e09273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09273
  50. Boyd J.H., Runkle D.E. Size and performance of banking firms: Testing the predictions of theory. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1993;31(1):47-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90016-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90016-9
  51. Schaeck K., Čihák M. Competition, efficiency, and soundness in banking: An industrial organization perspective. CentER Discussion Paper. 2010;(68S). URL: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/1246791/2010-20S.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1542483
  52. Akarsu S., Süer Ö. How investor attention affects stock returns? Some international evidence. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022;22(3):616-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.09.001
  53. Trichilli Y., Abdelhédi M., Boujelbène Abbes M. The thermal optimal path model: Does Google search queries help to predict dynamic relationship between investor’s sentiment and indexes returns? Journal of Asset Management. 2020;21(3):261-279. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-020-00159-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-020-00159-0
  54. Thompson S.B. Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. Journal of Financial Economics. 2011;99(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.016
  55. Driscoll J.C., Kraay A.C. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1998;80(4):549-560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  56. Hirshleifer D., Teoh S.H. Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2003;36(1-3):337-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.002
  57. Taylor S.E., Thompson S.C. Stalking the elusive ‘vividness’ effect. Psychological Review. 1982;89(2):155-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.89.2.155
  58. Hashem Pesaran M., Yamagata T. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics. 2008;142(1):50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  59. Roodman D. How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal. 2009;9(1):86-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900160. Exploring materiality. SASB Standards. URL: https://www.sasb.org/standards/materiality-map/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2022 Staroverova M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.